Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25402

Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized
Date Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:16:43 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 46
Message-ID <l2db9n$d53$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <aa287a36-de15-45eb-90a6-bb3f4e0e2853@googlegroups.com> <l1iduk$smc$1@dont-email.me> <419a414e-356f-4d1c-ab98-cc6613081bcd@googlegroups.com> <l1lllj$plo$1@dont-email.me> <db2d0fc9-8ff0-4b7c-b7d8-cf987960c0f2@googlegroups.com> <l2c5cd$j32$2@dont-email.me> <l2cmlo$4ca$1@dont-email.me> <l2cpku$mau$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Tue, 1 Oct 2013 02:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6b9e92482af47766954d85fb77d372f5"; logging-data="13475"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BrodBectEE2IVPW3fN3gb++/VU4lr6DQ="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
In-Reply-To <l2cpku$mau$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock sha1:eLYf+bHzCPfOyHF4jdWzl9YY5xU=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25402

Show key headers only | View raw


On 09/30/2013 05:15 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
> On 9/30/2013 4:24 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote:
>> On 09/30/2013 11:29 AM, Eric Sosman wrote:
>>> On 9/30/2013 11:08 AM, clus@aol.com wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 10:46:10 PM UTC-4, Jeff Higgins wrote:
>>>>> On 09/21/2013 02:40 PM, clus@aol.com wrote: LayoutManager
>>>>
>>>> How would I do this with GridLayout,
>>
>> Shrugs: provide some code and perhaps we'll see.
>>
>>>> since I'm using GridLayout. Here
>>>> are the details.
>>>>
>>>> In a frame, I first add a push button at the top. Below the button I
>>>> add two tables, side by side.
>>>>
>>>> The frame already resizes vertically to any length which is good.
>>>>
>>>> But, I want the frame to not resize horizontally beyond a certain
>>>> hardcoded limit. I.E.: I want the frame to resize horizontally, but
>>>> attempts to resize beyond a certain limit are prevented. So, if a user
>>>> were to try to resize horizontally beyond the limit then the resulting
>>>> horizontal width of the frame would be the limit.
>>>
>>>      Perhaps it's time to ask a question: Why do you think it's a
>>> good idea to prevent the user from arranging his own screen as
>>> he pleases?  Does your program understand the user's needs and
>>> desires better than he himself does?
>>
>> I've used such a program.
>
>      Did you enjoy it?  ;-)
>
>      That is: Did you consider it a benefit, a point in the
> program's favor, when the program's window resisted all your
> efforts to make it larger?  Did this behavior improve your
> experience of using the program?
>
Oh. I was responding to your comment concerning the program(mer)
who perhaps understands my needs and desires better than I do.
Many programmers provide sensible default behavior for users,
like me, who might not be familiar with the program or even
the subject matter. I don't recall seeing a GUI behavior such as
clus@aol.com describes, but maybe the subject matter warrants such.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-09-20 12:43 -0700
  Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-20 17:16 -0400
    Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-09-21 11:40 -0700
      Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-21 22:46 -0400
        Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "clus@aol.com" <clusardi2k@aol.com> - 2013-09-30 08:08 -0700
          Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 11:29 -0400
            Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-30 16:24 -0400
              Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 17:15 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-30 20:10 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 20:38 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-30 22:16 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 22:32 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-01 03:28 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-01 03:41 -0400
                Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-01 20:04 -0400
            Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-10-01 05:39 -0700
              Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-01 09:37 -0400
      Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-22 19:57 -0400

csiph-web