Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25395
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized |
| Date | 2013-09-30 11:29 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <l2c5cd$j32$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <aa287a36-de15-45eb-90a6-bb3f4e0e2853@googlegroups.com> <l1iduk$smc$1@dont-email.me> <419a414e-356f-4d1c-ab98-cc6613081bcd@googlegroups.com> <l1lllj$plo$1@dont-email.me> <db2d0fc9-8ff0-4b7c-b7d8-cf987960c0f2@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/30/2013 11:08 AM, clus@aol.com wrote:
> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 10:46:10 PM UTC-4, Jeff Higgins wrote:
>> On 09/21/2013 02:40 PM, clus@aol.com wrote: LayoutManager
>
> How would I do this with GridLayout, since I'm using GridLayout. Here are the details.
>
> In a frame, I first add a push button at the top. Below the button I add two tables, side by side.
>
> The frame already resizes vertically to any length which is good.
>
> But, I want the frame to not resize horizontally beyond a certain hardcoded limit. I.E.: I want the frame to resize horizontally, but attempts to resize beyond a certain limit are prevented. So, if a user were to try to resize horizontally beyond the limit then the resulting horizontal width of the frame would be the limit.
Perhaps it's time to ask a question: Why do you think it's a
good idea to prevent the user from arranging his own screen as
he pleases? Does your program understand the user's needs and
desires better than he himself does?
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-09-20 12:43 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-20 17:16 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-09-21 11:40 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-21 22:46 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "clus@aol.com" <clusardi2k@aol.com> - 2013-09-30 08:08 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-30 16:24 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 17:15 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-30 20:10 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 20:38 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-30 22:16 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 22:32 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-01 03:28 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-01 03:41 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-01 20:04 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-10-01 05:39 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-01 09:37 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-22 19:57 -0400
csiph-web