Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25400
| From | "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized |
| Date | 2013-09-30 20:10 -0400 |
| Organization | The Wasteland |
| Message-ID | <nospam-FADF6D.20101430092013@news.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <l1lllj$plo$1@dont-email.me> <db2d0fc9-8ff0-4b7c-b7d8-cf987960c0f2@googlegroups.com> <l2c5cd$j32$2@dont-email.me> <l2cmlo$4ca$1@dont-email.me> <l2cpku$mau$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <l2cpku$mau$1@dont-email.me>, Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> wrote: > >> Perhaps it's time to ask a question: Why do you think it's a > >> good idea to prevent the user from arranging his own screen as he > >> pleases? Does your program understand the user's needs and > >> desires better than he himself does? > > > > I've used such a program. > > Did you enjoy it? ;-) > > That is: Did you consider it a benefit, a point in the > program's favor, when the program's window resisted all your efforts > to make it larger? Did this behavior improve your experience of > using the program? I too have used such a program, almost daily, and I do not enjoy it. This example is somewhat contrived, but it gives the flavor of the experience. <http://stackoverflow.com/a/12532237/230513> -- John B. Matthews trashgod at gmail dot com <http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-09-20 12:43 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-20 17:16 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-09-21 11:40 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-21 22:46 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "clus@aol.com" <clusardi2k@aol.com> - 2013-09-30 08:08 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-30 16:24 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 17:15 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-30 20:10 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 20:38 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-30 22:16 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-09-30 22:32 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-01 03:28 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-01 03:41 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-01 20:04 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized clusardi2k@aol.com - 2013-10-01 05:39 -0700
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-01 09:37 -0400
Re: Is there something better than ComponentListener on Resized "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-22 19:57 -0400
csiph-web