Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26329
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!usenetcore.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:55:56 -0500 |
| Date | Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:55:53 +0100 |
| From | lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> |
| Organization | Trollbusters 3 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java EE Architecture |
| References | <69e1528a-aa62-41ce-88e5-1540f437e89e@googlegroups.com> <qMCdnd-cQ4RiAcvPnZ2dnUVZ7tudnZ2d@bt.com> <l3ljnp$i9c$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <0672ja-utj.ln1@tempest.fredriksson.dy.fi> |
| In-Reply-To | <0672ja-utj.ln1@tempest.fredriksson.dy.fi> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Message-ID | <daadnWh395wh7cPPnZ2dnUVZ8hSdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 73 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-AuthenticatedUsername | NoAuthUser |
| X-Trace | sv3-cxlw0MGrBfht85REvXIQoZzbuz3eYHucyrnQe+eZ/vGyPkH2rUNvDJWoRJVfgQVwoj7CYZ9BJe2uOPH!Dcd38qd5OAcW80npT2Jm+D5b8Z+wLfEIN/rjFZcUeSDVcLRSUPPlCTWfnTIyE6C4FPPvGZcmzq5J |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 3925 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26329 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 16/10/13 11:42, Donkey Hottie wrote:
> 16.10.2013 11:45, 1connu kirjoitti:
>> lipska the kat a écrit :
>>> On 09/10/13 21:41, art.marole@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to prepare typical Java EE solution (EJB, JSF, JPA) now,
>>>> and I have quite stupid problem related with domain objects. I want
>>>> to create Person class as persistence class, but I don't know in
>>>> which module I shoud put this class: Business Layer (ejb module) or
>>>> in Integration Layer (jar module).
>>>>
>>>> Person class is more related with logic, so I should put it in ejb
>>>> module, but in this case I will need to create dependency relation
>>>> from Integration Layer to Business Layer as Integration Layer need to
>>>> know what object should store in DB (ex. void store(Person object){};).
>>>> Put Person class in Integration Layer will remove this unwanted
>>>> dependency, but I feel that Person class is more Business class then
>>>> Integration class.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about it?
>>>
>>>
>>> A Person class ... A PERSON class., please, please, *please* don't
>>> have a Person class
>>>
>>> For the sake of whatever omnipotent deity you pray to, do not have a
>>> Person class
>>>
>>> *People* do not belong in a computer system.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Because it's a poor abstraction.
>>>
>>> How are you going to model consciousness, sentience, the 'mind', the
>>> 'soul'? let alone arms legs, eyes and teeth :-)
>>>
>>> You *do not need* a Person class.
>>>
>>> Let's put it another way
>>>
>>> The very fact that you are having problems deciding where your Person
>>> belongs should alert you to the fact that it is a poor abstraction.
>>>
>>> Try Account, or Record, or if you absolutely *must* User but not
>>> Person, you will end up regretting it.
>>>
>>> lipska
>>>
>>>
>> Why not ?
>> You can have an abstract class Person with minimum field (name, date
>> birth) and sub class depending of role of theses persons (ex User
>> (login/password) ) in your model.
>
> I see no problem with Person.
>
> I have interface IPerson, and implementations Person and ExternalPerson.
> I'm a lead programmer on an Identity Management solution.
You *cannot* be serious ... IPerson groan :-(
If you are developing an Identity Management system surely Identity
might be a better abstraction ... just a thought.
--
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java EE Architecture art.marole@gmail.com - 2013-10-09 13:41 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-10-09 14:45 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-09 22:00 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-09 22:18 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture art.marole@gmail.com - 2013-10-10 00:47 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:37 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-10 13:26 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture 1connu <1connu999@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 10:45 +0200
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 13:42 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 11:55 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 14:18 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 14:25 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 14:23 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 17:10 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 16:44 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "L." <carisio@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 10:15 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 19:01 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "L." <carisio@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 12:17 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-10-16 21:01 +0000
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:40 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-17 00:00 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2013-10-16 23:08 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-19 17:05 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 14:48 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 09:00 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 19:40 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 10:07 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-16 20:14 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-17 08:47 +0000
Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 20:19 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 21:24 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 11:49 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 22:24 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 13:39 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:39 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 13:43 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 23:22 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 08:53 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 08:57 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 19:31 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 09:56 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 20:18 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 10:56 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 21:39 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 12:08 +0100
Class Person [was: Java EE Architecture] "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-10-18 08:19 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-17 21:00 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-17 21:02 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-18 09:06 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-18 09:04 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-19 22:43 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 09:05 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-20 09:24 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:43 -0400
csiph-web