Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26343
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-16 12:17 -0700 |
| References | (6 earlier) <Hc6dnXuEVfLDDsPPnZ2dnUVZ8rydnZ2d@bt.com> <pbj2ja-v35.ln1@tempest.fredriksson.dy.fi> <IvqdnWuRar_hKcPPnZ2dnUVZ8umdnZ2d@bt.com> <5847c60f-7c56-4828-a01f-4b401a0a8cc3@googlegroups.com> <B-GdnbY_HvwZScPPnZ2dnUVZ8t6dnZ2d@bt.com> |
| Message-ID | <4b6899fe-7668-451f-86ec-96f641071b8e@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Java EE Architecture |
| From | "L." <carisio@gmail.com> |
You criticized someone just because he named a class "Person". You said:: "How are you going to model consciousness, sentience, the 'mind', the 'soul'? let alone arms legs, eyes and teeth :-)" IMO, a model is just a simplification of the reality. If I know someone is use my system and all I need to know is his/her name, I just need an attribute "name". Why do I need to model consciousness and the soul? When you asked things like that, I think you are trolling. >> Are you one of those people who thinks that disagreeing with someone or >> espousing a theory that others may not agree with is a troll? I'm not. But your theory just doesn't make any sense. You have suggested a better class name. For example, Employee or User or Manager or whatever else. An Employee or a User has consciousness, but you don't see any problem naming a class "Employee" or "User". So, Person has consciousness (and other abstract attributes). So do and Employee or a User. And you think name a class Person is nonsense and name a class Employee or User is quite adequate. So, I might be trolling, right? Em quarta-feira, 16 de outubro de 2013 15h01min37s UTC-3, lipska the kat escreveu: > On 16/10/13 18:15, L. wrote: > > > So I've read the signature: "Lipska the Kat�: Troll hunter". > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how a "Troll hunter" can be a troll. How this thing can be modeled using OO principles? > > > > I'm trying to understand how someone who top posts expects to be taken > > seriously ... but still, let's take things slowly. > > > > Are you one of those people who thinks that disagreeing with someone or > > espousing a theory that others may not agree with is a troll? > > > > If you are, allow me to provide this link > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet). > > > > Now you've read this, what encourages you to mark me down as a troll? > > > > Secondly, how can what thing "be modeled using OO principles?" > > > > > > > > -- > > Lipska the Kat�: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer > > and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun > > GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java EE Architecture art.marole@gmail.com - 2013-10-09 13:41 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-10-09 14:45 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-09 22:00 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-09 22:18 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture art.marole@gmail.com - 2013-10-10 00:47 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:37 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-10 13:26 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture 1connu <1connu999@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 10:45 +0200
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 13:42 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 11:55 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 14:18 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 14:25 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 14:23 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 17:10 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 16:44 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "L." <carisio@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 10:15 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 19:01 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "L." <carisio@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 12:17 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-10-16 21:01 +0000
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:40 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-17 00:00 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2013-10-16 23:08 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-19 17:05 +0300
Re: Java EE Architecture Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 14:48 -0700
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 09:00 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 19:40 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 10:07 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-16 20:14 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-17 08:47 +0000
Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 20:19 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 21:24 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 11:49 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 22:24 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 13:39 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:39 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 13:43 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 23:22 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 08:53 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 08:57 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 19:31 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 09:56 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 20:18 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 10:56 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 21:39 +1100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 12:08 +0100
Class Person [was: Java EE Architecture] "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-10-18 08:19 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-17 21:00 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-17 21:02 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-18 09:06 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-18 09:04 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-19 22:43 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 09:05 +0100
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-20 09:24 -0400
Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:43 -0400
csiph-web