Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26389

Re: Java EE Architecture

Date	2013-10-20 09:00 +0100
From	lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk">
Organization	Trollbusters 3
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Java EE Architecture
References	(5 earlier) <ml92ja-afn.ln1@tempest.fredriksson.dy.fi> <Hc6dnXuEVfLDDsPPnZ2dnUVZ8rydnZ2d@bt.com> <1xI7u.39986$ER3.22143@fx28.iad> <j5gaja-v1i.ln1@tempest.fredriksson.dy.fi> <49d3d3fe-e70b-422d-a1b6-cb9c90c59f89@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<fMmdnaMODK8GEP7PnZ2dnUVZ8nednZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 19/10/13 22:48, Lew wrote:
> Donkey Hottie wrote:
>> For example one Person: me.
>>
>> I have multiple Identities. Donkey Hottie is one. There are others.
>
> This entire discussion has revolved around the definitions of "Person",
> "Identity", and other types as if they had a correct definition.
>
> Whether a particular identifier is used in a program or not is a matter of art
> (where "art" is used in the technical sense, lest one need reminding here),
> and part of that is whether it conveys useful information to maintainers. In the
> restricted domain of discourse for any given system, for example a payroll
> system, a term like "Person" might well have a useful definition and scope.
>
> To lay down a ukase like "One should never use a 'Person' type in a production system"
> is as pointless as it is self-serving.

What on earth are you babbling about now Bloch?
How is it 'self-serving'?

You yourself opined

'This entire discussion has revolved around the definitions of "Person",
"Identity", and other types as if they had a correct definition.'

Do you see that last bit? ...
The bit that says "... as if they had a correct definition"

Those few words describe perfectly to me your complete lack of 
understanding of the issue at hand, it's exactly *because* Person does 
not have a 'correct' (although I prefer exact) definition (in terms of a 
software system) that it should not be used.

Object Oriented software engineering is a state of mind Bloch.
You obviously don't have it (the required state of mind) so I suggest 
you consider your responses before you make a fool of yourself again

[snip more incoherent nonsense]

... to avoid cargo-cult programming.

Why use one word when 100 will suffice

jeez

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net

Thread

Java EE Architecture art.marole@gmail.com - 2013-10-09 13:41 -0700
  Re: Java EE Architecture Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-10-09 14:45 -0700
    Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-09 22:00 -0400
  Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-09 22:18 -0400
    Re: Java EE Architecture art.marole@gmail.com - 2013-10-10 00:47 -0700
      Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:37 -0400
  Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-10 13:26 +0100
    Re: Java EE Architecture 1connu <1connu999@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 10:45 +0200
      Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 13:42 +0300
        Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 11:55 +0100
          Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 14:18 +0300
          Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 14:25 +0300
            Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 14:23 +0100
              Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-16 17:10 +0300
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 16:44 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture "L." <carisio@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 10:15 -0700
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 19:01 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture "L." <carisio@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 12:17 -0700
                Re: Java EE Architecture Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-10-16 21:01 +0000
                Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:40 -0400
                Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-17 00:00 +0300
              Re: Java EE Architecture Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2013-10-16 23:08 -0400
                Re: Java EE Architecture Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2013-10-19 17:05 +0300
                Re: Java EE Architecture Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-10-19 14:48 -0700
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 09:00 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-20 19:40 +1100
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 10:07 +0100
          Re: Java EE Architecture Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-16 20:14 -0400
            Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-17 08:47 +0000
        Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 20:19 -0400
          Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 21:24 -0400
      Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 11:49 +0100
        Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-16 22:24 +1100
          Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-16 13:39 +0100
            Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:39 -0400
              Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 13:43 +1100
              Re: Java EE Architecture Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-10-16 23:22 -0400
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 08:53 +0100
              Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 08:57 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 19:31 +1100
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 09:56 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 20:18 +1100
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 10:56 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-10-17 21:39 +1100
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-17 12:08 +0100
                Class Person [was: Java EE Architecture] "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-10-18 08:19 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-17 21:00 -0400
                Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-17 21:02 -0400
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-18 09:06 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-18 09:04 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-19 22:43 -0400
                Re: Java EE Architecture lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-10-20 09:05 +0100
                Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-20 09:24 -0400
      Re: Java EE Architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-10-16 20:43 -0400

csiph-web