Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37977
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-01-22 14:33 -0800 |
| References | (8 earlier) <2og75ddcriocfvaejf49n59r23ur2j5m9u@4ax.com> <p30hge$v1b$1@dont-email.me> <ig885d5jurdj1amhr07sjc4ghcuct8htpb@4ax.com> <p3jkq7$btf$1@dont-email.me> <28ad0dde-7a53-406d-a424-10b45cc9364a@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <cdca7ca3-63e9-4088-8f2b-da8fe5da2c55@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime |
| From | bursejan@gmail.com |
Not sure whether MATLAB is the right example, but going to Wolfram Alpha gives me easily: floor(10^36/81) https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=floor%2810^36%2F81%29 This doesn't fit into a Java int. Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018 23:26:56 UTC+1 schrieb burs...@gmail.com: > If you go to FaceBook and Google+ Java programmers > groups, you see a lot of newbees expecting that > an overflow check is the default. > > But somehow, when you are from an older generation, > and when you read the Java spec, and see that primitive > types such as int and long are fixed in type sizes, > > etc.. etc.. then you remember what a CPU arithmetic > means, and that this is usually, where n depends > on the type sizes: > > a +_CPU b = (a + b) mod 2^n > > a -_CPU b = (a - b) mod 2^n > > a *_CPU b = (a * b) mod 2^n > > a /_CPU b = (a / b) mod 2^n > > Etc.. > > I really admired Java always that they had fixed the > type sizes. In other languages, such as C, it might > easily happen that n varies from platform to platform, > > and you need to define your own types, if you want > them to be constant from platform to platform. But well > the overall expectation seems really to be > > that languages are more safe or parallel recursion > theory, where we assume unbounded integers. Maybe this > has also to do, that on a higher level, some > > applications such as MATLAB etc.. etc.. deliver > the illusion of the recursion theoretic model. Which > might mislead programms that touch Java for the first time. > > Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018 02:34:13 UTC+1 schrieb Daniele Futtorovic: > > On 2018-01-09 03:03, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:40:59 +0100, Daniele Futtorovic > > > <da.futt.news@laposte.net> wrote: > > > Despite all one's thought on the matter, errors can still happen. > > > Read up about the Ariane 5 launch that went wrong. It was due to code > > > reuse from the Ariane 4. An assumption that was true on the Ariane 4 > > > was not true about the Ariane 5, and Bad Stuff happened. > > > > > >> You are imputing that an overflow is a garbage result per se. Therefore, > > >> you argue, letting an overflow happen, regardless of whether one thinks > > >> about it or not, is an error. Well, yeah. But that's a strawman. > > > > > > It almost always is. Since it is the exceptional case, let it be > > > handled exceptionally. > > > > I know about the Ariane 5 thing. And yes, I have to agree that wanting > > an overflow is the exceptional case. And that exceptional handling for > > it is therefore justified. I prefer it without, at a gut level; but > > having thought about it some more, I cannot argue against it intellectually. > > > > -- > > DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-01-04 15:16 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 07:04 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-01-04 10:13 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 08:01 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2018-01-04 18:33 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-01-04 19:29 +0000
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-01-04 15:09 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-04 21:43 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-01-04 15:53 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-05 16:06 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-01-05 09:51 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-05 20:59 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2018-01-05 12:15 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-01-05 21:52 +0000
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-01-08 11:13 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-01-05 16:27 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-06 00:06 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-01-05 23:57 +0000
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-01-07 20:06 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-01-08 04:10 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-01-08 04:31 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-08 16:25 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-01-08 20:05 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-01-08 17:55 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-01-08 11:19 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-08 20:40 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-01-08 18:03 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2018-01-16 02:33 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-01-22 14:26 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-01-22 14:33 -0800
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-01-04 19:16 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-01-05 12:17 +0000
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-01-05 00:13 +0100
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-01-05 11:05 -0500
Re: Unexpected Boxing Error at Runtime bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-01-06 06:18 -0800
csiph-web