Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32934
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: What goes wrong with cloning here |
| Date | Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:44:40 +0200 |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| Lines | 187 |
| Message-ID | <87fv11kv4n.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| References | <87oafplh3t.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <87pp05k1h5.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2qdkxlh.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="528adfd6ad074c92fdc6a7f8fb9e23d8"; logging-data="3271"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+3lM8NQwz764FDwvTY3Tx+/O2LCF/AN+I=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| X-Homepage | http://www.decebal.nl/ |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:2BGn1SsbbEb8oXLwh5hm0gJhMr8= sha1:1nlA9vyPwTpWTEEEY+eBailBZFo= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:32934 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Saturday 24 Oct 2015 00:51 CEST, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> On Friday 23 Oct 2015 18:12 CEST, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
>> Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> writes:
>>
>>> When I in class A change a field from class B in the clone, the
>>> field in the original is also changed. That should not happen.
>>>
>>> public class A implements Cloneable {
>>> private B key;
>>> ^^^
>>> public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
>>> A clone = (A) super.clone();
>>> B newKey = new B();
>>> B oldKey = getKey();
>>>
>>> newKey.setA(oldKey.getA());
>>> newKey.setB(oldKey.getB());
>>> newKey.setC(oldKey.getC());
>>> newKey.setD(oldKey.getD());
>>> clone.setKey(key);
>> ^^^
>>
>> I guess here you want to set the key of the clone to newKey, not to
>> this.key.
>
> Was an error in my dumbing down. :'-( In the original program it was
> done correctly.
>
>
> I found the problem. It is an application where the class is a JPA
> class. When doing the test (in the original program) with an entity
> that was gotten by a read it goes wrong. When doing it with an
> entity gotten by a new it does what I expect.
>
> Maybe it has to do with the fact that key is the primary key?
For if someone is interested. I rewrote the code. I made the class B
Cloneable again. (Was like this before my first post, but I was
thinking that maybe there went something wrong.) When class B changes
class A does not need to change. Also added hashCode to toString.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What goes wrong with cloning here Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-10-23 17:49 +0200
Re: What goes wrong with cloning here Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> - 2015-10-23 18:12 +0200
Re: What goes wrong with cloning here Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-10-24 00:51 +0200
Re: What goes wrong with cloning here Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-10-24 01:44 +0200
csiph-web