Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #50952
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: new embedded forth |
| Date | 2016-09-13 15:59 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87mvjbe78y.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nr7lcb$npp$1@dont-email.me> <87d1k8fto5.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nr7nc5$s6d$1@dont-email.me> <878tuwfsci.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nr9e1i$nr$1@dont-email.me> |
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: > In this case it works because Espressif is using the CPU internally to > their parts. A bastard offshoot of a mainstream processor won't get > much attention from the large vendors because while specifics for a > given design will change as a product matures, they often aren't > willing to toss out the entire body of software and start over. Weren't we just saying that unit price was everything? I don't see a body of software needing to be tossed either. It's a me-too 32-bit architecture in the same class as the Cortex M3, more or less. Low level code (bootup etc) is supplied in a toolkit from Espressif. After that I'd expect it's mostly programmed in higher level languages, so there might be some normal porting effort (change some peripheral drivers etc) involved in migrating to a different chip, but otherwise it's a matter of reconfiguring the compiler to the new target. It doesn't seem like a huge deal. > Espressif is happy with this core as they won't have any trouble > supporting it but will have to fund the next generation > themselves. Will they ever be price competitive if they have to break > in the new process generation 100% on their own? They're fabless, their new part is done on TSMC 40nm, not sure about the old one. TSMC is still behind Intel but they're pretty far up there. > Espressif will find they are the AMD of the market always 6 months > behind their competitors with higher power and slower speeds They're not making servers or desktops--their part is fast enough for its market (and the new one is dual core). It wouldn't surprise me if the cpu power consumption is worse than a comparable ARM and that would matter more to people, but the chip's specialty is wireless comms, so its total power usage will probably be dominated by the radios. >> For some reason bluetooth stuff is more expensive than wifi stuff > Really? Where do you see that? See http://wemos.cc for a complete ESP8266 board which is Espressif's wifi chip. It's comparable to small ARM boards seen around here, but with wifi. If you click "buy it" you get an order page where you can buy them for $4.00 and there are some knockoffs that are under $3.00 for the complete board. I don't know of anything that cheap with Bluetooth. These boards (lots of vendors are making them) are very popular in the maker community and the Micropython guys are putting significant effort into supporting them. Here's the new version (ESP32, not yet shipping) which does have Bluetooth: https://www.seeedstudio.com/ESP3212-Wifi-Bluetooth-Combo-Module-p-2706.html The amount of stuff on that chip is amazing and at $7 it's the first counterexample I've seen to "bluetooth is more expensive" (Nordic and TI based modules have less stuff and are in the $20 range). That module is a quite powerful computer system in its own right even without the wireless, comparable to the ARM Launchpads or ST Discovery boards, but smaller than a matchbook and ridiculously cheap. Yes, $7 is more than $3, but it also has wifi and a ton more features.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
new embedded forth Jean-Michel Thoorens <jeanmichel.thoorens@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 09:45 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-02 13:01 -0500
Re: new embedded forth Jean-Michel Thoorens <jeanmichel.thoorens@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 11:08 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-02 13:48 -0500
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-11 23:45 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-12 09:51 -0500
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-12 13:15 -0700
Re: new embedded forth albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-12 22:46 +0200
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-12 14:30 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Jean-Michel Thoorens <jeanmichel.thoorens@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 01:11 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-13 01:32 -0700
Re: new embedded forth albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-13 11:13 +0200
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-13 10:25 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:55 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Jean-Michel Thoorens <jeanmichel.thoorens@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 02:37 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 21:39 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-12 18:57 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 22:13 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-12 19:26 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:46 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-13 15:59 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 19:06 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:37 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 10:41 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-03 13:21 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:50 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-09-14 07:45 +0200
Re: new embedded forth Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-09-30 15:32 +0200
Re: new embedded forth albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-13 11:14 +0200
Re: new embedded forth Jean-Michel Thoorens <jeanmichel.thoorens@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 04:44 -0700
Re: new embedded forth JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-07 04:59 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Jean-Michel Thoorens <jeanmichel.thoorens@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 05:45 -0700
Re: new embedded forth rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 10:57 -0400
Re: new embedded forth Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-08 10:06 -0500
Re: new embedded forth JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-08 08:16 -0700
Re: new embedded forth Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-07 12:25 -0500
csiph-web