Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #53283

Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad
Date Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:25:22 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 18
Message-ID <87mvg22m65.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <4ca00d44-3973-4ddc-8572-6616882b0252@googlegroups.com> <412f1cc4-221e-4e6e-ad69-c615f8b84073@googlegroups.com> <o2csc8$966$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o2ct3k$4ve$1@dont-email.me> <o2fe03$2hi$2@gioia.aioe.org> <HNmdncVJE8KaUNbFnZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@supernews.com> <87fee783-ce0e-4461-bd3b-6f3b9719e692@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7ddf5da685426b492c645834bd309ff4"; logging-data="31865"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197AyjUzrFi4eQE6lhZ0fcj"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:qq2KR6JuxrcuCtgMNWnqrvWoAmU= sha1:b3I8I2NSP05fQDrzKBLkJd4iJzw=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:53283

Show key headers only | View raw

november.nihal@gmail.com writes:
> If quotations are quoted lists, are all quoted lists quotations ?  ...
> The power of quotations is you can manipulate a list and thus the
> sequence of the code with ease.

I don't understand the bit about quotations being quoted lists.  Do you
mean like in Lisp?  That's certainly not a necessary characteristic.  I
thought a Forth quotation was just supposed to be a function pointer
made from an anonymous code block, that could appear in the middle of a
colon definition.  Lots of other languages have features like that and
it's useful.  Whether it's a good fit for Forth is more debatable.

> Given we are talking about quotations within the context of forth, I
> think :noname is a poor substitute.

Afaict, quotations per the ANS proposal are a straightforward syntactic
convenience--quotations that can reach outer scopes for locals are more
powerful but much harder to implement.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 03:23 -0800
  Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 09:06 -0800
    Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-12-09 11:03 +1100
      Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2016-12-09 00:17 +0000
        Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-12-10 10:14 +1100
          Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-09 19:54 -0800
            Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad "Robert L." <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org> - 2016-12-10 06:44 +0000
              Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 00:37 -0800
              Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad polymorph self <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 06:39 -0800
          Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-12-10 03:38 -0600
            Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad november.nihal@gmail.com - 2016-12-11 08:57 -0800
              Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-11 10:19 -0800
              Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-11 13:25 -0800
                Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-11 17:39 -0800
                Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad november.nihal@gmail.com - 2016-12-11 17:49 -0800
                Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-11 20:31 -0800
                Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad november.nihal@gmail.com - 2016-12-12 07:01 -0800
                Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-11 21:50 -0800
    Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad polymorph self <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2016-12-11 06:20 -0800
  Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-07 09:26 -0800
  Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-12-07 11:44 -0600
    Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-12-08 09:58 +0000
      Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-12-21 21:18 +0000
        Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad gavinschuette@gmail.com - 2016-12-21 23:00 -0800
  Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2016-12-21 09:41 -0800
  Re: Object-Oriented Programming is Bad gavinschuette@gmail.com - 2016-12-21 23:00 -0800

csiph-web