Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #38709
Show key headers only | View raw
krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org writes: > Does the standard say precisely that the compiler *must* eliminate the > section of code in which the UB occurs? No, but it's in the standard's spirit, which the compiler devs followed. And again, whether the standard's spirit shows wisdom is debatable, but the theory is that the standard committee represents the C user community, and an awful lot of C programmers (maybe a majority) will vote for speed over freedom from hazards. If it skipped that optimization you're complaining about, other users would ask why the compiler was generating suboptimal code for their oh-so-important program, just for the sake of programmers who weren't careful or responsible enough to study the standard before coding. > Perhaps if the standard explicitly states that in a UB case, the > compiler must always optimize to the fastest execution time, The compiler isn't required to optimize for fastest execution time and doesn't always do so. It does it when you ask it to, by putting -O on the command line. > No rational coder would take such an interpretation when he reads the > source. Rational coders unfamiliar with C's quirks might make plausible assumptions that turn out to be wrong and get them bitten. That's what happened to you. Some possible rational reactions might include: 1) learn about the quirks (they are well documented) and take them into account in the future so you hopefully won't get bitten again; 2) decide that C is unsafe for anything critical and look toward other languages; 3) participate in constructive discussions about updating the standard, e.g. Regehr's proposal of a friendly dialect. 4) Program in C with a lot of trepidation, making use of -Wall and other analysis tools, and (the standards guy I had the discussion with was big on this) have detailed multi-person code reviews for anything important. Not-so-rational is: calling a permitted optimization a compiler bug when there's evidence that other users (maybe not all of them) want the optimization. Anyway, you now know something new about signed ints in C, so use the knowledge well. Or if you want wraparound arithmetic, you can use unsigned or -fwrapv. > As for doing what the standard permits, like I say, there's no dispute > about that. But, we certainly can take the compiler to task for doing > something inconsistent with prior practice. These issues were debated when the standard was written in the 1980s and knowledgeable C programmers have understood the issue the whole time since then. It's not clear to me what "prior practice" was but this optimization has been in GCC for quite a while. > Yes, it's intended for use on the PC. Python may be a possibility. Forth also seems like the obvious choice, but I assume you already had some reason not to have used it.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-15 11:20 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 04:13 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 04:55 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-16 12:08 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 05:29 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 07:07 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth franck.bensusan@gmail.com - 2015-04-16 07:44 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 08:14 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-16 14:02 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 08:12 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 12:25 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 17:02 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 17:06 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2015-04-16 17:24 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 17:39 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-16 17:47 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 18:44 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 18:50 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-16 19:10 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-16 20:10 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-16 20:27 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 02:04 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-17 11:41 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 14:45 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-18 14:01 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-17 07:47 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 08:35 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-17 10:33 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 11:15 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-17 11:47 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 14:51 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-18 14:41 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-24 11:42 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-04-24 09:02 -1000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-05-02 10:53 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-03 17:22 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-05-04 10:23 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-22 00:10 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 17:45 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-22 13:08 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-17 20:27 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 14:41 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-18 14:11 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-17 15:47 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-18 14:34 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-18 14:09 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-19 20:31 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-20 11:35 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 18:07 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-22 11:21 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-24 19:34 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-25 08:36 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-25 11:36 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-25 16:29 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-19 10:08 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-19 20:11 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-20 12:05 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-22 01:27 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 18:18 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-22 11:00 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-24 11:28 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-25 01:34 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-24 21:07 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-25 16:41 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-25 10:06 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-26 14:56 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-26 20:22 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-27 09:02 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth mhx@iae.nl - 2015-04-27 03:59 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-27 15:45 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth "Rod Pemberton" <bork@lllljunkqwer.cpm> - 2015-04-27 18:09 -0400
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-28 03:55 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-27 19:30 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-27 19:44 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth "Rod Pemberton" <bork@lllljunkqwer.cpm> - 2015-04-28 02:03 -0400
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-28 01:44 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 02:44 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 16:47 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-28 17:00 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 17:14 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-28 17:59 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 21:41 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-29 03:07 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-28 18:13 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-29 00:07 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-28 22:22 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-28 14:23 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-28 23:51 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-28 16:50 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2015-05-10 12:24 -0400
Re: rhel 7 and kforth mhx@iae.nl - 2015-04-26 22:16 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-04-27 09:19 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth mhx@iae.nl - 2015-04-27 04:03 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth "Rod Pemberton" <bork@lllljunkqwer.cpm> - 2015-04-27 18:21 -0400
Re: rhel 7 and kforth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-05-01 14:46 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-04-23 16:46 +0200
Re: rhel 7 and kforth albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-17 10:35 +0000
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 08:43 -0700
Re: rhel 7 and kforth krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org - 2015-04-17 08:41 -0700
csiph-web