Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135515
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth, comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) |
| Date | Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:31:06 -0700 |
| Organization | A place where nothing fits quite right |
| Lines | 31 |
| Message-ID | <20260901143106.00006dd7@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <87qzk0nejz.fsf@nightsong.com> <116d89d$27baf$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2026Aug24.095510@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <87a4q0afu7.fsf_-_@debian> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 01 Sep 2026 21:31:11 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; logging-data="2250378"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3FW2wc/CH6Q3WH/0SEA+Pzb2Seo6yCXk="; posting-host="8c0b8a103aadf988976ffde894443734" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:6rGSO2SZEftF0PQxE8/+RBxskWk= sha256:c9iQZFdo8Wyjxw3sfyI07tM0UlOlT4EAN/tFr7DEbhU= sha1:vrKXW41FERn+kZt3VOFqykwysuU= sha256:K+s+un6TpY6eWesGPKLy+Jy/yVA2b7vOGixBT10gRC0= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:135515 comp.arch:117723 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:15:12 -0300 Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> wrote: > > RISC-V follows its ancestor MIPS (from where it also has many > > mnemonics) in this respect. For a new way to add the carry > > functionality without adding a condition code register, read > > > > https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/tmp/carry.pdf > > > > (unpublished). > > This is a fascinating idea. I guess the MuP21 had a carry bit in > every “general-purpose register”, making them 21 bits, but I’ve never > seen any other architecture do this, nor a version that separates out > overflow bits from carry bits. > > I also didn’t realize that (base) RISC-V needed 5 instructions *per > word* for multi-precision addition. Hm, that *is* a bit interesting, though the idea of including non- number info in a numeric register drives me a little crazy. (It is, admittedly, no weirder than what you already deal with in floating- point hardware.) The idea I had last time I dabbled with this stuff was to extend the basic add/subtract instructions with an option to save the carry/borrow value in another GPR, instead - but I never gave any thought to how to represent overflow that way. Hmm.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: Epic RISC-V rant Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-08-14 22:22 -0700
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant jkn <jkn+nin@nicorp.co.uk> - 2026-08-15 10:10 +0100
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-08-22 18:23 +0200
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-08-22 16:45 +0000
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-08-22 22:36 +0000
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-08-23 13:44 +0200
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-08-29 19:49 +0000
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-08-24 07:55 +0000
adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-01 17:15 -0300
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 14:31 -0700
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 17:18 -0500
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-02 02:04 +0000
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 08:23 -0700
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-11 13:48 -0300
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-11 18:03 +0000
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-09-09 11:16 +0000
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-02 01:53 +0000
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-09-09 10:50 +0000
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-09 22:10 -0700
Re: adding overflow and carry to every GPR (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-11 14:28 -0300
Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-08-29 20:12 +0000
interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-01 17:00 -0300
Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-09-01 20:51 +0000
Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-02 01:43 +0000
interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2026-09-02 08:11 -0700
csiph-web