Re: selection-sort in C

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:00:51 -0500
Message-ID	<4E4CF0CB.52FF@mindspring.com> (permalink)
Date	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:00:27 -0400
From	pete <pfiland@mindspring.com>
Reply-To	pfiland@mindspring.com
Organization	PF
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: selection-sort in C
References	<4e4a4fc9$0$313$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <871uwlk39e.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> <4e4a563d$0$313$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <slrnj4o8fb.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <4E4C9814.53B@mindspring.com> <87ty9fqq1j.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <4E4C9E0F.4796@mindspring.com> <87pqk3qo0z.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	32
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	4.154.219.8
X-Trace	sv3-73J8kp2zvua6i3a7b1fw09fcJU/0MCRILSfemT4RQ5Wzp0gEKM42uDhn3URXFssaaf9rF4Hbi7/jlay!cB8YUlmUmFKhBDaFHiroxopoJgckvf4WSghzqR3ywBYwDiCnc9XF1erxN3B+UcHp9gIIlk0lfX5P!XdRSgcMi
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2271
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:9522

Show key headers only | View raw

Ben Pfaff wrote:
> 
> pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> 
> > Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>
> >> pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Also,
> >> > if the parameters are const qualified
> >> > in the definition of a function,
> >> > then they should also be const qualified in any prototype
> >> > of that function.
> >>
> >> Are you are expressing a style preference here?  I do not think
> >> that the C standard makes that requirement.
> >
> > That's what a prototype is.
> 
> I think that you have missed the following parenthetical in
> 6.7.5.3 "Function declarators (including prototypes)":
> 
>       (In the determination of type compatibility and of a
>       composite type, each parameter declared with function or
>       array type is taken as having the adjusted type and each
>       parameter declared with qualified type is taken as having
>       the unqualified version of its declared type.)

Yes, I did miss that.

-- 
pete

Thread

selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 11:08 +0000
  Re: selection-sort in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:24 +0300
    Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 11:36 +0000
      Re: selection-sort in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:22 +0100
        Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 13:44 +0000
          Re: selection-sort in C Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:36 -0700
        Re: selection-sort in C Thomas Boell <tboell@domain.invalid> - 2011-08-16 18:03 +0200
          Re: selection-sort in C karnath <karnathtorjian@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 16:25 +0000
            Re: selection-sort in C Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-08-16 16:33 +0000
          Re: selection-sort in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 20:03 +0100
        Re: selection-sort in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-16 09:27 -0700
      Re: selection-sort in C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-17 20:17 +0000
        Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 00:41 -0400
          Re: selection-sort in C Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-17 21:52 -0700
            Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 01:07 -0400
              Re: selection-sort in C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-17 22:36 -0700
                Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 07:00 -0400
    Re: selection-sort in C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 14:41 -0700
      Re: selection-sort in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:10 +1200
        Re: selection-sort in C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 17:25 -0700
          Re: selection-sort in C pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2011-08-17 01:53 +0000
  Re: selection-sort in C Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 05:27 -0700
  Re: selection-sort in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-08-16 07:24 -0700
  Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-16 19:22 -0400
    Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-17 07:52 +0000
      Re: selection-sort in C Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-17 10:15 +0000
      Re: selection-sort in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 13:22 +0300
      Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 00:33 -0400

csiph-web