Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #9485

Re: selection-sort in C

Show all headers | View raw

karnath wrote:
) On 2011-08-16, Thomas Boell <tboell@domain.invalid> wrote:
)> If the compiler would do the allocation (i. e. reserving space on the
)> stack) exactly where it's requested, it would be more expensive to
)> declare the variable inside the loop. But I doubt that any optimizing
)> compiler would do that in this case; the allocation would be moved
)> outside the loop, or possibly the variable is allocated in a free
)> register, so allocating the variable inside the loop isn't any more
)> expensive than outside.
)>
)
) Asking for clearance.
)
) If we are using compiler without optimization it would be right to
) put initialization before scope in topic case, won't it?

No.

If you are using compiler without optimization you obviously don't care
about performance, so it would not be right.  You should write code in
the most clear way, and keeping declarations close to usage is clearer
according to most opinions.


SaSW, Willem
-- 
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
            made in the above text. For all I know I might be
            drugged or something..
            No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 11:08 +0000
  Re: selection-sort in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:24 +0300
    Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 11:36 +0000
      Re: selection-sort in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:22 +0100
        Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 13:44 +0000
          Re: selection-sort in C Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:36 -0700
        Re: selection-sort in C Thomas Boell <tboell@domain.invalid> - 2011-08-16 18:03 +0200
          Re: selection-sort in C karnath <karnathtorjian@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 16:25 +0000
            Re: selection-sort in C Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-08-16 16:33 +0000
          Re: selection-sort in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 20:03 +0100
        Re: selection-sort in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-16 09:27 -0700
      Re: selection-sort in C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-17 20:17 +0000
        Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 00:41 -0400
          Re: selection-sort in C Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-17 21:52 -0700
            Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 01:07 -0400
              Re: selection-sort in C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-17 22:36 -0700
                Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 07:00 -0400
    Re: selection-sort in C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 14:41 -0700
      Re: selection-sort in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:10 +1200
        Re: selection-sort in C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 17:25 -0700
          Re: selection-sort in C pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2011-08-17 01:53 +0000
  Re: selection-sort in C Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 05:27 -0700
  Re: selection-sort in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-08-16 07:24 -0700
  Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-16 19:22 -0400
    Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-17 07:52 +0000
      Re: selection-sort in C Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-17 10:15 +0000
      Re: selection-sort in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 13:22 +0300
      Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 00:33 -0400

csiph-web