Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: selection-sort in C |
| Date | 2011-08-17 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87ty9fqq1j.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4e4a4fc9$0$313$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <871uwlk39e.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> <4e4a563d$0$313$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <slrnj4o8fb.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <4E4C9814.53B@mindspring.com> |
pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> Also,
> if the parameters are const qualified
> in the definition of a function,
> then they should also be const qualified in any prototype
> of that function.
Are you are expressing a style preference here? I do not think
that the C standard makes that requirement.
GCC 4.4 doesn't warn about the following translation unit, even
with -Wall -Wextra -ansi -pedantic:
int f(int);
int f(const int x) { return x; }
int g(const int);
int g(int x) { return x; }
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 11:08 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:24 +0300
Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 11:36 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:22 +0100
Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-16 13:44 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:36 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C Thomas Boell <tboell@domain.invalid> - 2011-08-16 18:03 +0200
Re: selection-sort in C karnath <karnathtorjian@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 16:25 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-08-16 16:33 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 20:03 +0100
Re: selection-sort in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-16 09:27 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-17 20:17 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 00:41 -0400
Re: selection-sort in C Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 01:07 -0400
Re: selection-sort in C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-17 22:36 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 07:00 -0400
Re: selection-sort in C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 14:41 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:10 +1200
Re: selection-sort in C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-16 17:25 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2011-08-17 01:53 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 05:27 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-08-16 07:24 -0700
Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-16 19:22 -0400
Re: selection-sort in C arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-08-17 07:52 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-17 10:15 +0000
Re: selection-sort in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 13:22 +0300
Re: selection-sort in C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-08-18 00:33 -0400
csiph-web