Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6990

Re: linear programming

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!feeder.news-service.com!216.196.110.142.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:30:12 -0500
From Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: linear programming
References <12e289fe-86ca-4bd3-b391-9a1a4005476f@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <itmpgv$5qc$1@dont-email.me> <527d07f5-0d08-4e29-9c58-8c87b2b18e89@k27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <itnctg$lad$1@dont-email.me> <51a740f2-8558-46ad-95fa-cc879b6af75c@u19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <slrnivuoss.kk5.pino@mud.stack.nl> <23a38e00-f9bb-4aa5-a8d8-4620364e4514@gc3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <slrnivv7ij.kk5.pino@mud.stack.nl>
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:30:09 +0100
Message-ID <87mxhbvjj2.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:MlqdSyrKDMFE97h8EBkZsNVteu8=
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines 19
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace sv3-lPMcCIJcs2VxWaafmkKn+rO0kWhp7IaFNBuZToj7Q4SMoIPCO467cXwnh+3P9UibZ7NdLJ998YGW5mr!Klk5c9T2zLETpGcsRlRWog9ujtuVitHk7NeFSlJZz8e5lDkHOSx41K5j1eAe6hFCaqE=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2120
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:6990

Show key headers only | View raw

Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> writes:

>> Anyway, go find one of the numerous mathematicians of your
>> acquaintance and ask them what the definition an "unbounded linear
>> program" is. Then ask them what the definition of "unbounded feasible
>> region" is.
>
> Irrelevant. I didn't question the validity of that statement. I questioned
> the validity of your "argument".

You don't understand what "we say" means in this context.  That's OK.
It's not your first language, and its not your field of expertise. You
made an entirely forgiveable mistake.

But please have the humility not to "correct" someone for whom it *is*
there first language, in their field of expertise, and then accuse
*them* of being full of themselves.

Because that is *not* a forgiveable mistake.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-19 20:53 -0700
  Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 08:36 +0200
    Re: linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 00:58 -0700
      Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 11:38 +0200
    Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 03:07 -0700
      Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 14:09 +0200
        Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 05:59 -0700
          Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 06:03 -0700
          Re: linear programming Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2011-06-20 15:13 +0000
            Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 08:38 -0700
              Re: linear programming Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2011-06-20 19:24 +0000
                Re: linear programming Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 06:30 +0100
                Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 00:17 -0700
            [OT] Re: linear programming Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-20 21:56 +0200
              Re: linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 17:27 -0700
  Re: linear programming "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-20 11:17 +0100
  Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 03:07 -0700
  [OT] Re: linear programming Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-20 19:38 +0200

csiph-web