Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6950

Re: linear programming

From "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: linear programming
Date 2011-06-20 14:09 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <itnctg$lad$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <12e289fe-86ca-4bd3-b391-9a1a4005476f@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <itmpgv$5qc$1@dont-email.me> <527d07f5-0d08-4e29-9c58-8c87b2b18e89@k27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

* gwowen, on 20.06.2011 12:07:
> On Jun 20, 7:36 am, "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet"<alf.p.steinbach
> +use...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Let
>>
>>     A = (the program) does not have finite objective value
>>     B = (the program) is unbounded
>>
>> One statement you're quoting is that A implies B.
>
> That's not right.  The statement he quotes gives B as the *definition*
> of A, so A<=>  B

An "if-then" is a one way implication, not two-way.

For example, IF the text is so vague/informal as to not make that distinction, 
THEN it's meaningless to ponder very fine details of meaning in the text.


Cheers & hth.,

- Alf

-- 
blog at <url: http://alfps.wordpress.com>

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-19 20:53 -0700
  Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 08:36 +0200
    Re: linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 00:58 -0700
      Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 11:38 +0200
    Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 03:07 -0700
      Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 14:09 +0200
        Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 05:59 -0700
          Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 06:03 -0700
          Re: linear programming Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2011-06-20 15:13 +0000
            Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 08:38 -0700
              Re: linear programming Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2011-06-20 19:24 +0000
                Re: linear programming Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 06:30 +0100
                Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 00:17 -0700
            [OT] Re: linear programming Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-20 21:56 +0200
              Re: linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 17:27 -0700
  Re: linear programming "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-20 11:17 +0100
  Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 03:07 -0700
  [OT] Re: linear programming Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-20 19:38 +0200

csiph-web