Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6990

Re: linear programming

From Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: linear programming
References (3 earlier) <itnctg$lad$1@dont-email.me> <51a740f2-8558-46ad-95fa-cc879b6af75c@u19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <slrnivuoss.kk5.pino@mud.stack.nl> <23a38e00-f9bb-4aa5-a8d8-4620364e4514@gc3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <slrnivv7ij.kk5.pino@mud.stack.nl>
Date 2011-06-21 06:30 +0100
Message-ID <87mxhbvjj2.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> writes:

>> Anyway, go find one of the numerous mathematicians of your
>> acquaintance and ask them what the definition an "unbounded linear
>> program" is. Then ask them what the definition of "unbounded feasible
>> region" is.
>
> Irrelevant. I didn't question the validity of that statement. I questioned
> the validity of your "argument".

You don't understand what "we say" means in this context.  That's OK.
It's not your first language, and its not your field of expertise. You
made an entirely forgiveable mistake.

But please have the humility not to "correct" someone for whom it *is*
there first language, in their field of expertise, and then accuse
*them* of being full of themselves.

Because that is *not* a forgiveable mistake.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-19 20:53 -0700
  Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 08:36 +0200
    Re: linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 00:58 -0700
      Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 11:38 +0200
    Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 03:07 -0700
      Re: linear programming "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 14:09 +0200
        Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 05:59 -0700
          Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 06:03 -0700
          Re: linear programming Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2011-06-20 15:13 +0000
            Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 08:38 -0700
              Re: linear programming Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2011-06-20 19:24 +0000
                Re: linear programming Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 06:30 +0100
                Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 00:17 -0700
            [OT] Re: linear programming Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-20 21:56 +0200
              Re: linear programming eric <cneric12lin0@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 17:27 -0700
  Re: linear programming "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-20 11:17 +0100
  Re: linear programming gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 03:07 -0700
  [OT] Re: linear programming Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-20 19:38 +0200

csiph-web