Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71205 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-01-07 11:26 +0100 |
| Last post | 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 11:26 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:26 +1300
Re: explicit specialization problem "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 23:23 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:29 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 22:34 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:46 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-07 22:58 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:36 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 03:56 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 13:00 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:02 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:15 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:48 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:53 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 07:16 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-08 16:28 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-08 15:00 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 14:44 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 02:20 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 19:42 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-09 19:40 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <87imlkjxza.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| In reply to | #71233 |
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: > On 1/8/2020 6:20 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 1/8/2020 7:00 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>>>>> You had: >>>>>>>> template<> >>>>>>>> template<typename T> >>>>>>> Yes, but makes also sense and it is accepted by g++. >>>>> >>>>>> It does not make sense in that context ... >>>>> >>>>> And why does g++ accept this ? >>>> >>>> It's not accepted by recent gcc versions (8.x and above). >>>> >>> >>> Fwiw, still working with: >>> >>> g++.exe (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project) 7.3.0 >> >> Not sure what you mean by "working". > > Compiling, and generating an executable. I see. That's what I said, though I gave more a general answer. Your word "still" suggested you weren't simply give an example of what I'd said. -- Ben.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-09 19:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnr1f0cu.9in.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| In reply to | #71246 |
On Thu, 2020-01-09, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 1/8/2020 6:20 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 1/8/2020 7:00 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> You had: >>>>>>>>> template<> >>>>>>>>> template<typename T> >>>>>>>> Yes, but makes also sense and it is accepted by g++. >>>>>> >>>>>>> It does not make sense in that context ... >>>>>> >>>>>> And why does g++ accept this ? >>>>> >>>>> It's not accepted by recent gcc versions (8.x and above). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fwiw, still working with: >>>> >>>> g++.exe (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project) 7.3.0 >>> >>> Not sure what you mean by "working". >> >> Compiling, and generating an executable. > > I see. That's what I said, though I gave more a general answer. Your > word "still" suggested you weren't simply give an example of what I'd > said. I think what really happened was, when you wrote "not accepted by recent gcc versions (8.x and above)" you had an implicit "but accepted in 7.x" and Chris thought you implied "... and I don't know when it stopped being accepted". /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <874kx4jpgs.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| In reply to | #71248 |
Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> writes: > On Thu, 2020-01-09, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 1/8/2020 6:20 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 1/8/2020 7:00 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You had: >>>>>>>>>> template<> >>>>>>>>>> template<typename T> >>>>>>>>> Yes, but makes also sense and it is accepted by g++. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It does not make sense in that context ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And why does g++ accept this ? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not accepted by recent gcc versions (8.x and above). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fwiw, still working with: >>>>> >>>>> g++.exe (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project) 7.3.0 >>>> >>>> Not sure what you mean by "working". >>> >>> Compiling, and generating an executable. >> >> I see. That's what I said, though I gave more a general answer. Your >> word "still" suggested you weren't simply give an example of what I'd >> said. > > I think what really happened was, when you wrote "not accepted by > recent gcc versions (8.x and above)" you had an implicit "but accepted > in 7.x" and Chris thought you implied "... and I don't know when it > stopped being accepted". Oh yes. That's likely how it was read. Thanks. Anyway, not disagreement exists about the facts! -- Ben.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web