Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end
From	"Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)
Date	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:09:37 +0200
Organization	Compilers Central
Lines	10
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<14-09-011@comp.compilers> (permalink)
NNTP-Posting-Host	news.iecc.com
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace	miucha.iecc.com 1410372591 79999 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 (10 Sep 2014 18:09:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords	OOP, design
Posted-Date	10 Sep 2014 14:09:51 EDT
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref	csiph.com comp.compilers:1377

Show key headers only | View raw

You wrote:
> [I've always thought of OOP as being orthogonal to imperative,
> declarative, or functional. But I'm not sure how much it matters.
> Are there any functional OOP languages? -John]

OCaml is both functional and object oriented: http://ocaml.org

--
Nils M Holm  < n m h @ t 3 x . o r g >  www.t3x.org

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2014-09-10 19:09 +0200

csiph-web