Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #1377 > unrolled thread

Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)

Started by"Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
First post2014-09-10 19:09 +0200
Last post2014-09-10 19:09 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers


Contents

  Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2014-09-10 19:09 +0200

#1377 — Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)

From"Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
Date2014-09-10 19:09 +0200
SubjectRe: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)
Message-ID<14-09-011@comp.compilers>
You wrote:
> [I've always thought of OOP as being orthogonal to imperative,
> declarative, or functional. But I'm not sure how much it matters.
> Are there any functional OOP languages? -John]

OCaml is both functional and object oriented: http://ocaml.org

--
Nils M Holm  < n m h @ t 3 x . o r g >  www.t3x.org

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers


csiph-web