Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end From: "Nils M Holm" Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:09:37 +0200 Organization: Compilers Central Lines: 10 Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <14-09-011@comp.compilers> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: miucha.iecc.com 1410372591 79999 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 (10 Sep 2014 18:09:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: OOP, design Posted-Date: 10 Sep 2014 14:09:51 EDT X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:1377 You wrote: > [I've always thought of OOP as being orthogonal to imperative, > declarative, or functional. But I'm not sure how much it matters. > Are there any functional OOP languages? -John] OCaml is both functional and object oriented: http://ocaml.org -- Nils M Holm < n m h @ t 3 x . o r g > www.t3x.org