Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #825
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Green Compiler ? |
| Date | Mon, 31 Dec 2012 01:24:13 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 32 |
| Sender | johnl@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <13-01-002@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <12-12-010@comp.compilers> <12-12-012@comp.compilers> <12-12-022@comp.compilers> <12-12-028@comp.compilers> <12-12-034@comp.compilers> <12-12-037@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | leila.iecc.com 1357091644 21497 64.57.183.58 (2 Jan 2013 01:54:04 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 2 Jan 2013 01:54:04 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | performance, architecture |
| Posted-Date | 01 Jan 2013 20:54:04 EST |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2453 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:825 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:14:26 +0100, Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> wrote: >Peter Dassow schrieb: >> On 28.12.2012 08:35, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: >>> >>> Please note that most CMOS processor power consumption results from >>> switching (stray) capacities, and only a small percentage for leak >>> currents. E.g. a register or gate consumes such power whenever a bit is >>> changed, and almost nothing when it has reached an stable state. Smaller transistors have more leakage. >> So using extensively registers instead of "conventional" memory (e.g. >> DDR-RAM, memory outside a CPU) will save energy (if equal functionality >> is given) ? > >I don't see a relationship here, except that external memory is slow >and [in x86] a couple of caches and address translations are involved >in reading from RAM. But associative cache and external memory accesses both are power intensive. >But registers are a very scarce resource, so that frequent loading from >memory is hardly avoidable. My opinions are colored by experience with DSPs, but I have long thought that it would be helpful to have a few K-words of non-cache scratchpad memory very close (1..2 cycles) to the CPU. George
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Green Compiler ? Abid <abidmuslim@gmail.com> - 2012-12-20 02:00 -0800
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-23 08:18 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2012-12-26 19:31 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-28 03:09 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-28 08:35 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-28 16:14 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2012-12-29 09:35 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-30 08:14 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-12-31 01:24 -0500
Re: Green Compiler ? "Jonathan Thornburg" <jthorn@astro.indiana.edu> - 2013-01-02 04:09 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 18:29 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 05:11 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2013-01-02 07:29 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 19:52 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2013-01-04 08:59 -0600
Re: Green Compiler ? "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2012-12-23 10:01 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-24 05:16 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-12-27 13:36 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2012-12-28 09:11 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-12-28 16:57 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-12-28 12:57 -0500
Re: Green Compiler ? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-12-30 09:22 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-27 21:59 -0600
Re: Green Compiler ? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-12-28 10:42 -0500
csiph-web