Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #821
| From | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Green Compiler ? |
| Date | 2012-12-30 08:14 +0100 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <12-12-037@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <12-12-010@comp.compilers> <12-12-012@comp.compilers> <12-12-022@comp.compilers> <12-12-028@comp.compilers> <12-12-034@comp.compilers> |
Peter Dassow schrieb: > On 28.12.2012 08:35, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: >> >> Please note that most CMOS processor power consumption results from >> switching (stray) capacities, and only a small percentage for leak >> currents. E.g. a register or gate consumes such power whenever a bit is >> changed, and almost nothing when it has reached an stable state. >> > So using extensively registers instead of "conventional" memory (e.g. > DDR-RAM, memory outside a CPU) will save energy (if equal functionality > is given) ? I don't see a relationship here, except that external memory is slow and [in x86] a couple of caches and address translations are involved in reading from RAM. But registers are a very scarce resource, so that frequent loading from memory is hardly avoidable. Register usage is already optimized by every (good) compiler, reducing runtime and power consuption at the same time. This was a very narrow bottleneck of the IA-32 architecture, until the 64 bit (AMD) model increased the number of registers considerably (16 addressable, of 128 [256?] shadow registers). The CPU computation circuitry and usage is the same, regardless of the operand sources. DoDi
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Green Compiler ? Abid <abidmuslim@gmail.com> - 2012-12-20 02:00 -0800
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-23 08:18 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2012-12-26 19:31 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-28 03:09 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-28 08:35 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-28 16:14 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2012-12-29 09:35 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-30 08:14 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-12-31 01:24 -0500
Re: Green Compiler ? "Jonathan Thornburg" <jthorn@astro.indiana.edu> - 2013-01-02 04:09 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 18:29 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 05:11 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2013-01-02 07:29 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 19:52 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2013-01-04 08:59 -0600
Re: Green Compiler ? "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2012-12-23 10:01 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-24 05:16 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-12-27 13:36 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2012-12-28 09:11 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-12-28 16:57 +0000
Re: Green Compiler ? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-12-28 12:57 -0500
Re: Green Compiler ? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-12-30 09:22 +0100
Re: Green Compiler ? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-27 21:59 -0600
Re: Green Compiler ? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-12-28 10:42 -0500
csiph-web