Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #71341
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.cars, aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem |
| Date | 2024-10-02 17:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <lm4bh3F4ihnU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <llve1oFbvvpU3@mid.individual.net> <llvljpFd5mnU1@mid.individual.net> <lm3cufF4dlU1@mid.individual.net> <lm3l4lF1ba6U1@mid.individual.net> <lm45leF3lqlU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Keithr0 wrote: > On 2/10/2024 11:14 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Keithr0 wrote: >>> On 30/09/2024 10:58 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>> On 30-Sept-24 6:48 pm, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 30-Sept-24 3:50 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 28-Sept-24 5:48 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>> It's the manufacturers software. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/09/flaw-in-kia-web-portal-let- >>>>>>>>> researchers-track-hack-cars/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The same potential issue applies to any "internet of things" >>>>>>>> device in your home. If they are on your internal LAN (by >>>>>>>> accessing your WiFi, for example), then they're providing a >>>>>>>> tunnel from the supplier's computer system through your >>>>>>>> firewall, and you have no idea how well the supplier's end is >>>>>>>> protected. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I won't have any internet 'listening' devices in any home I live in >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No, but it's not just those. Anything that can be remotely >>>>>> updated automatically (sometimes whether you want it to be, or >>>>>> not), or which can be talked to via a smartphone, will usually >>>>>> work by phoning home, >>>> >>>> cameras for instance. I have all internal cameras set facing wall >>>> surfaces, so even if they were hacked nothing would be seen. but I >>>> would know if they were hacked because they would have turned to >>>> face into the rooms. I turn them via smartphone control to monitor >>>> the rooms if away for any length of time, like holidays. but if >>>> they were hacked I'm not sure what info could be got from them. >>> >>> Have you ever considered that you might be paranoid? >>> >>> Anyway anybody hacking into your "Security" cameras (notoriously >>> easy to hack) would likely be more interested in incorporating them >>> into a botnet rather than observing whatever disgusting things that >>> you get up to in your house. >> >> perhaps your mum never told you.. "if you don't have anything >> worthwhile to say, don't say anything". or if she did, you didn't listen >> > Perhaps you should have thought of that before cross-posting a stupid > Elon Musk rant across the Usenet. he's a hell of a lot smarter and successful than you, so perhaps you should address what's said instead of just complaining > Now aus.cars and aus.computers are polluted with a stupid argument > between Rod Speed and Usenet's No.1 idiot. aus.cars and aus.computers were already polluted. you're there! -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-09-30 22:58 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-10-01 08:04 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 09:06 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-10-01 05:05 +0000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 09:13 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 11:26 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 12:08 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 13:52 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 19:30 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-10-02 08:55 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 11:14 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-02 17:37 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 06:55 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 07:28 +1000
Re: Chinese software isn't the biggest problem Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-03 13:21 +1000
csiph-web