Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usage.english > #1151582 > unrolled thread

Super Intelligence

Back to article view | Back to alt.usage.english

Contents

  Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-29 19:11 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-09-30 10:14 +0200
      Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-09-30 18:37 +1000
        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:34 -0700
        Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-01 20:07 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2026-10-02 20:01 -0300
            Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-04 09:27 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Bob <usenet@bananacorp.nl.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:51 +0000
            Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-07 17:15 +0200
              Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:03 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 12:59 -0700
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 04:20 +0800
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 16:03 -0700
                      Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:35 +0800
                        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 18:08 -0700
                          Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 10:01 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-08 09:02 +0200
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 21:11 +0800
                  Re: Super Intelligence Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-10-08 17:29 +0200
                    Re: Super Intelligence Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2026-10-08 17:09 -0300
                      Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-09 08:37 +0200
                        Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 15:39 +0800
                          Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-11 17:52 +0200
                            Re: Super Intelligence Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-10-11 11:45 -0700
                              Re: Super Intelligence Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-10-11 12:24 -0700
                              Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-12 10:15 +0200
                                Re: Super Intelligence Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-10-12 02:45 -0700
                                  Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-12 12:54 +0200
                                    Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-13 00:02 +0800
                                  Re: Super Intelligence Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-10-12 19:12 +0100
                  Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 10:38 -0700
                    Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:37 +0800
                      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 16:26 -0700
                        Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
                        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-18 12:30 -0700
                          Re: Super Intelligence Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-18 16:17 -0600
                            Re: Super Intelligence Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2026-10-19 11:26 +1300
                              Re: Super Intelligence Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-18 16:49 -0600
                            Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-19 13:02 +1100
                      Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:49 +1100
                        Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 17:17 -0700
                        Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
                          Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 19:02 -0700
                          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:12 -0700
                  Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-09 09:27 +1300
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:16 -0700
                  Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:29 +1100
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:22 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence squalk <sq@net.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:17 +0100
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:43 +0800
                    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:26 -0700
              Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-08 11:00 +1300
      Re: Super Intelligence Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> - 2026-09-30 12:23 +0200
        Re: Super Intelligence "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-10-01 17:22 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-10-01 20:07 +0100
            Re: Super Intelligence Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-10-02 09:21 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> - 2026-10-01 22:52 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:26 -0700
            Re: Super Intelligence "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:56 +0200
              Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:47 -0700
          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:27 -0700
          Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:30 -0700
            Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-02 11:37 +0200
              Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-02 20:37 +1000
                Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-07 17:21 +0200
                  Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:06 +0800
              Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-02 22:57 +0800
              Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:53 -0700
        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:22 -0700
          Re: Super Intelligence HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-02 12:07 +0000
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:30 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2026-10-07 02:55 -0400
      Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:08 +0800
        Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-07 23:04 +0200
          Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-08 10:21 +1100
            Re: Super Intelligence Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-10-07 20:13 -0700
            Re: Super Intelligence Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-10-08 08:24 +0200
              Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-08 11:44 +0200
              Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-08 22:34 +1100
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 21:13 +0800
                  Re: Super Intelligence Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2026-10-08 17:01 -0300
                    Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:55 +0800
                    Re: Super Intelligence Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-10-08 21:59 -0400
                      Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 10:20 +0800
                  Re: Super Intelligence Bob <usenet@bananacorp.nl.invalid> - 2026-10-25 15:19 +0000
              Re: Super Intelligence Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-10-08 14:12 -0400
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:57 +0800
              Re: Super Intelligence Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 18:10 -0400
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:32 -0700

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

#1151582 — Super Intelligence

Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151586

Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?

What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human 
irrationality?

-- 
guido wugi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151587

On 30/09/26 18:14, guido wugi wrote:
> Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:

>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?

Well, there's Dunning and Kruger.

> What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> irrationality?

It's hard to tell, because at present we are faced with a combination of
the two. There is an urgent need to equip AIs with something equivalent
to the first two laws of robotics, but people who want to put in
safeguards are being blocked by an incredibly stupid US president.

-- 
Peter Moylan       peter@pmoylan.org    http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151608

Peter Moylan wrote:
> 
> On 30/09/26 18:14, guido wugi wrote:
> > Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> 
> >> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> 
> Well, there's Dunning and Kruger.
> 
> > What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
> > irrationality?
> 
> It's hard to tell, because at present we are faced with a combination of
> the two. There is an urgent need to equip AIs with something equivalent
> to the first two laws of robotics, but people who want to put in
> safeguards are being blocked by an incredibly stupid US president.


When Albert Einstein builted the atomic bomb he didn't have any
safeguards...


just drop the thing.


kill them all!


You see, what THEY won't tell you..
Albert Einstein didn't believe human beings had any souls.




> 
> --
> Peter Moylan       peter@pmoylan.org    http://www.pmoylan.org
> Newcastle, NSW

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151635

On 30/09/2026 10:37, Peter Moylan wrote:
> On 30/09/26 18:14, guido wugi wrote:
>> Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
> 
>>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
> 
> Well, there's Dunning and Kruger.
> 
>> What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
>> irrationality?
> 
> It's hard to tell, because at present we are faced with a combination of
> the two. There is an urgent need to equip AIs with something equivalent
> to the first two laws of robotics, but people who want to put in
> safeguards are being blocked by an incredibly stupid US president.
> 

Hmm, for once I find myself in agreement with the Drumph.

To be clear, he is not blocking safeguards. He is saying slowing done AI
development is not a good idea. He is correct in saying that, because if
the competition (China, Russia) does not conform to those guidelines,
they will end up with far more potent and aggressive AIs than those of
OpenAI and Anthropic.

Have you read Neal Stepheson's cyberpunk novels 'Snow Crash' and
'Cryptonomicon'? In there human agents don headgear and penetrate enemy
cyber-defences, a bit like (virtual) fighter pilots navigating a war
zone. Considering the novels were written in the 1990s - well before
current AI developments - they are quite visionary.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151703

occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:

> Have you read Neal Stepheson's cyberpunk novels 'Snow Crash' and
> 'Cryptonomicon'? 

Multiple times.

> In there human agents don headgear and penetrate enemy
> cyber-defences, a bit like (virtual) fighter pilots navigating a war
> zone. Considering the novels were written in the 1990s - well before
> current AI developments - they are quite visionary.

As a great Stephenson fan, I have to ask, aren't you getting your
cyberpunks mixed up?  That kind of virtual space hacking was the
central concept of William Gibson's 1984 'Neuromancer'. Both of
Sephenson's novels are very different.

[ Nod to r.a.tv: Wikipedia says there's a tv series based on
[ Neuromancer due to premiere in January.

-- 
Mike Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151760

On 03/10/2026 01:01, Mike Spencer wrote:
> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
> 
>> Have you read Neal Stepheson's cyberpunk novels 'Snow Crash' and
>> 'Cryptonomicon'? 
> 
> Multiple times.
> 
>> In there human agents don headgear and penetrate enemy
>> cyber-defences, a bit like (virtual) fighter pilots navigating a war
>> zone. Considering the novels were written in the 1990s - well before
>> current AI developments - they are quite visionary.
> 
> As a great Stephenson fan, I have to ask, aren't you getting your
> cyberpunks mixed up?  That kind of virtual space hacking was the
> central concept of William Gibson's 1984 'Neuromancer'. Both of
> Sephenson's novels are very different.

You are right. I have read Gibson's 'Neuromancer' too, and both readings
(Gibson, Stephenson) were more than 40 years ago. Some cross-wire there.

> 
> [ Nod to r.a.tv: Wikipedia says there's a tv series based on
> [ Neuromancer due to premiere in January.
> 

I look forward to that. The fact that Neuromancer was written in 1984 -
before AI /and/ the internet - makes it even more visionary.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151758

occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:

>On 30/09/2026 10:37, Peter Moylan wrote:
>> On 30/09/26 18:14, guido wugi wrote:
>>> Op 30/09/2026 om 4:11 schreef The Starmaker:
>> 
>>>> Does anybody here have Super Intelligence besides me?
>> 
>> Well, there's Dunning and Kruger.
>> 
>>> What's more dangerous: artificial intelligence or genuine human
>>> irrationality?
>> 
>> It's hard to tell, because at present we are faced with a combination of
>> the two. There is an urgent need to equip AIs with something equivalent
>> to the first two laws of robotics, but people who want to put in
>> safeguards are being blocked by an incredibly stupid US president.
>> 

>Hmm, for once I find myself in agreement with the Drumph.

>To be clear, he is not blocking safeguards. He is saying slowing done AI
>development is not a good idea. He is correct in saying that, because if
>the competition (China, Russia) does not conform to those guidelines,
>they will end up with far more potent and aggressive AIs than those of
>OpenAI and Anthropic.

>Have you read Neal Stepheson's cyberpunk novels 'Snow Crash' and
>'Cryptonomicon'? In there human agents don headgear and penetrate enemy
>cyber-defences, a bit like (virtual) fighter pilots navigating a war
>zone. Considering the novels were written in the 1990s - well before
>current AI developments - they are quite visionary.

The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151932

On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
> 

<snip>

> 
> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?

It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
<https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>

If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
"Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
processes."

The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.

The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
better, quicker and cheaper.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151938

On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
>>
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>
>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
> 
> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
> 
> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
> processes."
> 
> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
> 
> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
> The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
> better, quicker and cheaper.

So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
go about that in the first place?
-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151946

Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> 
> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
> > On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
> >> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
> >>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>
> >> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
> >> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
> >
> > It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
> > <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
> >
> > If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
> > "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
> > in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
> > intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
> > structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
> > processes."
> >
> > The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
> > coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
> > made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
> >
> > The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
> > The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
> > feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
> > better, quicker and cheaper.
> 
> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
> go about that in the first place?


For example???? 


you wanna make a baby with an Ai? 



> --
> Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
> I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
> https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
> Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151948

On 10/8/2026 3:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
>>
>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
>>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
>>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
>>>
>>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
>>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
>>>
>>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
>>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
>>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
>>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
>>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
>>> processes."
>>>
>>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
>>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
>>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
>>>
>>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
>>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
>>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
>>> better, quicker and cheaper.
>>
>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
>> go about that in the first place?
> 
> 
> For example????
> 
> 
> you wanna make a baby with an Ai?
>

You don't know how to do something the A.I. cannot?  I mean, it's not
hard to find the gaps in its knowledege.  My go-to problem is /trans-
actional file system/.

Ask the A.I. to make one for you.  You'll quickly find the gaps, and
will have to teach it the details.  Which is a waste of time, because
it forgets everything as soon as its window of context is too large.


Best wishes, and happy doing something the A.I. cannot!

-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151951

Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> 
> On 10/8/2026 3:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
> >>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
> >>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
> >>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
> >>>
> >>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
> >>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
> >>>
> >>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
> >>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
> >>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
> >>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
> >>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
> >>> processes."
> >>>
> >>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
> >>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
> >>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
> >>>
> >>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
> >>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
> >>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
> >>> better, quicker and cheaper.
> >>
> >> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
> >> go about that in the first place?
> >
> >
> > For example????
> >
> >
> > you wanna make a baby with an Ai?
> >
> 
> You don't know how to do something the A.I. cannot?  I mean, it's not
> hard to find the gaps in its knowledege.  My go-to problem is /trans-
> actional file system/.
> 
> Ask the A.I. to make one for you.  You'll quickly find the gaps, and
> will have to teach it the details.  Which is a waste of time, because
> it forgets everything as soon as its window of context is too large.
> 
> Best wishes, and happy doing something the A.I. cannot!

I don't know what is a "transactional file system"..

but I know of things Ai cannot do because it simply has not learned it
yet, that's
where you come in and 'train it' yourself.

First collect links either from the internet or your own documents, and
Upload it to Ai.

It will read it all, and tell Ai ...


Role: You are a knowledgeable expert on the topic below.

Task: Role: You are a knowledgeable Transactional NTFS expert

Constraints:
- If key details are missing, state your assumptions in one line, then
answer.
- Be specific and concrete; do not restate the task back to me.

Output format: A structured answer with short paragraphs or bullets —
whichever fits the content best.

Tone: Professional but natural; no filler phrases.


https://www.google.com/search?q=PROMPT%3A+Role%3A+You+are+a+knowledgeable+Transactional+NTFS+expert.



(just mees with it to fit your needs)


teach ai how to blow up the earth!






> 
> --
> Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
> I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
> https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
> Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151953

On 10/8/2026 7:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
>> On 10/8/2026 3:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
>>>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
>>>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
>>>>>> occam<occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
>>>>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
>>>>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
>>>>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
>>>>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
>>>>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
>>>>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
>>>>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
>>>>> processes."
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
>>>>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
>>>>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
>>>>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
>>>>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
>>>>> better, quicker and cheaper.
>>>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
>>>> go about that in the first place?
>>>
>>> For example????
>>>
>>>
>>> you wanna make a baby with an Ai?
>>>
>> You don't know how to do something the A.I. cannot?  I mean, it's not
>> hard to find the gaps in its knowledege.  My go-to problem is /trans-
>> actional file system/.
>>
>> Ask the A.I. to make one for you.  You'll quickly find the gaps, and
>> will have to teach it the details.  Which is a waste of time, because
>> it forgets everything as soon as its window of context is too large.
>>
>> Best wishes, and happy doing something the A.I. cannot!
> I don't know what is a "transactional file system"..
> 
> but I know of things Ai cannot do because it simply has not learned it
> yet, that's
> where you come in and 'train it' yourself.

Seems you claim you're an NTFS "expert" and didn't know about this?

  
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/about-transactional-ntfs

Note, I don't really count NFTS as a /transactional file system/, be-
cause Microsoft has deprecated this and might remove it without further
notice.

Now, do something similar for Linux, Unix of your choice.  Why not Open-
ZFS because that's also available for Windows?

   https://github.com/openzfsonwindows/openzfs/releases

I don't care if you use Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, or Illumos, but please
make this happen.  The L.L.Ms. need to know how to do this, right?

So you implement a file system where you can atomically modify two or
more files, with the proviso that all writes happen at the "same time"
or none at all.  Here, "same time" means as visible from another pro-
cess reading the file.

All writes should succeed, or none.  So you can't just modify one file,
commit that, and then modify the next.  The first file's modification
have to roll back if the second file's write()s fail for any reason.

Such as a broken hard disk, assuming the file systems spans more than
one volume.


Are you up to this task?  How can you let an A.I. do this for you?
-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151954

Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> 
> On 10/8/2026 7:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> >> On 10/8/2026 3:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> >>>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
> >>>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
> >>>>>> occam<occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <snip>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
> >>>>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
> >>>>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
> >>>>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
> >>>>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
> >>>>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
> >>>>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
> >>>>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
> >>>>> processes."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
> >>>>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
> >>>>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
> >>>>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
> >>>>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
> >>>>> better, quicker and cheaper.
> >>>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
> >>>> go about that in the first place?
> >>>
> >>> For example????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> you wanna make a baby with an Ai?
> >>>
> >> You don't know how to do something the A.I. cannot?  I mean, it's not
> >> hard to find the gaps in its knowledege.  My go-to problem is /trans-
> >> actional file system/.
> >>
> >> Ask the A.I. to make one for you.  You'll quickly find the gaps, and
> >> will have to teach it the details.  Which is a waste of time, because
> >> it forgets everything as soon as its window of context is too large.
> >>
> >> Best wishes, and happy doing something the A.I. cannot!
> > I don't know what is a "transactional file system"..
> >
> > but I know of things Ai cannot do because it simply has not learned it
> > yet, that's
> > where you come in and 'train it' yourself.
> 
> Seems you claim you're an NTFS "expert" and didn't know about this?
> 

Ok, I'll repeat again in English...

I wrote:

"I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."
"I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."
"I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."


but I know of things Ai cannot do because 
it simply has not learned it yet, that's
where you come in and *train it* 'yourself'.

 *train it* 'yourself'.
 *train it* 'yourself'.



First collect links (books, pdf's) either from the internet or
 your own documents, and
Upload it to Ai.

and
Upload it to Ai.

and
Upload it to Ai.

and don't forget to
Upload it to Ai.

It will read it all, and then tell Ai ...


---------------------begins here-------------------------------

PROMPT:
Role: You are a knowledgeable expert on the topic below.

Task: Role: You are a knowledgeable Transactional expert

------------------------------ends here-------------------- 


https://www.google.com/search?q=PROMPT%3A+Role%3A+You+are+a+knowledgeable+Transactional+expert



'wats wes gots heres is a failure to communicate'









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151955

On 10/8/2026 9:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Ok, I'll repeat again in English...
> 
> I wrote:
> 
> "I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."
> "I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."
> "I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."

And I both gave you a link, and told you.  You claim to have some sort
of /super intelligence/ yet you cannot grasp the most fundamentals of
reading comprehension?

So, what exactly are you?  Do you think you get any respect by posting
gibberish in alt.usage.english?  Have you even read any of Jabu Musa
Jabir ibn Hayyan's work?
-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151964

On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
>>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
> 
> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
> go about that in the first place?

Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151990

On 10/8/2026 3:02 PM, occam wrote:
> On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
>>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>
>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
>> go about that in the first place?
> 
> Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning.

I'm far away from your gutters.  So you'd have to buy the remote
controlled robots from -- who was it? -- Boston Robotics first.

At that point, it's probably cheaper to hire a human locally.
-- 
Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
https://bsky.app/profile/myrkraverk.bsky.social | for ( ;; ) _:;
Federated at https://fed.brid.gy/bsky/myrkraverk.bsky.social

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1151995

On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 09:02:30 +0200, occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote:

>On 07/10/2026 20:03, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
>>>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>> 
>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
>> go about that in the first place?
>
>Can you clean gutters? My roof gutters need cleaning.

Mine too. 

Is it possible that aue might be useful for something that *couldn't*
be done in 5 second on the Internet?






-- 
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1152009

Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> writes:

> Is it possible that aue might be useful for something that *couldn't*
> be done in 5 second on the Internet?

The remarkable capacity for pattern recogniton [1] has been upstaged
and the public awareness hijacked by the stunning breakthrough of LLMs
in natural language. Language fits the internet perfectly.

Medical diagnosis from various image data and weeding large vinyards
by AI-controlled robots come to mind.


[1] "Pattiducking", if you remember reading Stand on Zanzibar

-- 
Mike Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.usage.english

csiph-web