Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.magic.secrets > #293
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt, alt.magic.secrets, alt.conspiracy |
|---|---|
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
| Subject | Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip |
| References | (3 earlier) <VuOcnRx1hrX_mN_3nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <111tkdh$a0h0$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <LMacnao1i-yBFN73nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1120hkl$14c6l$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> <qcOdnYnjabFedN73nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Message-ID | <reU0S.3$kfzb.0@fx35.iad> (permalink) |
| Date | 2026-06-30 18:51 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 2026-06-30, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > On 6/30/26 09:51, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > >> On 6/30/2026 5:14 PM, c186282 wrote: >> >>>> Can you fabricate 0.000000...0000000001 nm chips? >>>> >>>> Is zero the seal or wall? :) >>> >>> Um, pretty quick you get to ATOMS ... and, for any >>> normal electronics, that's IT. >> >> You cannot have 0.000000....00 nm chip. >> >> That's a void, empty, nothing. :) I tried to think through the implications of this but I got a divide error. > "Electronics" are now about literal atom-thick structures. > Can't go any smaller. > > Any better future stuff will have to exploit quantum > effects - get more bang for yer nanometer. Alas quantum > stuff isn't as deterministic as bulk matter devices > and suffer from the uncertainty principle. Omigod, we might have to revive the KISS principle in order to get anything more done. The proponents of complexity as a weapon will be so disappointed... -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | No artificial \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | intelligence was X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | used in the creation / \ if you read it the right way. | of this post.
Back to alt.magic.secrets | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 13:11 +0800
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-29 01:39 -0400
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 19:20 +0800
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-29 12:57 +0100
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-30 05:14 -0400
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 21:51 +0800
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-30 12:06 -0400
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-30 18:51 +0000
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-30 23:51 +0000
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-30 23:45 +0000
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer.... physics? "quantum"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-01 12:24 +0800
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-01 03:13 -0400
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-01 15:29 +0800
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-30 16:27 +0100
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-30 23:28 +0000
csiph-web