Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.magic.secrets > #295

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt, alt.magic.secrets, alt.conspiracy
Subject Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Date 2026-06-30 23:45 +0000
Message-ID <naj2pgFgpa7U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <VuOcnRx1hrX_mN_3nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <111tkdh$a0h0$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <LMacnao1i-yBFN73nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1120hkl$14c6l$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> <qcOdnYnjabFedN73nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:06:38 -0400, c186282 wrote:

>    Any better future stuff will have to exploit quantum effects - get
>    more bang for yer nanometer. Alas quantum stuff isn't as
>    deterministic as bulk matter devices and suffer from the uncertainty
>    principle.

Physics was a 4 semester course and the 4th was quantum when it started to 
get weird. On one essay test I wrote about Heisenberg's uncertainty 
principle versus Heidegger's principle uncertainty. Fortunately the 
professor had a sense of humor or maybe he realized how far off the beaten 
path the original quantum guys got when you start thinking about the Being 
of beings.

Back to alt.magic.secrets | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 13:11 +0800
  Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-29 01:39 -0400
    Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 19:20 +0800
      Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-29 12:57 +0100
      Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-30 05:14 -0400
        Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 21:51 +0800
          Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-30 12:06 -0400
            Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-30 18:51 +0000
              Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-30 23:51 +0000
            Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-30 23:45 +0000
              Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer.... physics? "quantum"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-01 12:24 +0800
              Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-01 03:13 -0400
                Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-01 15:29 +0800
        Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-30 16:27 +0100
          Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-30 23:28 +0000

csiph-web