Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt

alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt

11301 articles, 1757 threads (numbers 33090 – 44515) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip (35 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 13:11 +0800
   → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-06-29 01:39 -0400
     → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:20 +0800
       → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:57 +0100
       → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-06-30 05:14 -0400
         → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 21:51 +0800
           → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-06-30 12:06 -0400
             → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> 2026-06-30 18:51 +0000
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-30 17:58 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 01:15 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-07-01 10:15 +0100
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-06-30 23:51 +0000
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 03:16 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-07-01 10:05 +0100
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-07-01 17:43 +0000
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-07-01 20:23 +0100
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 00:48 -0400
             → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-06-30 23:45 +0000
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer.... physics? "quantum"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 12:24 +0800
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 03:13 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 15:29 +0800
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 04:22 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 23:41 +0800
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-02 01:56 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-02 14:04 +0800
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-02 16:50 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-07-02 21:26 +0000
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-02 18:11 -0400
             → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-30 22:09 -0400
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 03:29 -0400
                 → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-07-01 10:11 +0100
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-07-01 10:08 +0100
         → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-30 16:27 +0100
           → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-06-30 23:28 +0000
             → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> 2026-07-01 02:04 -0400
               → Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-07-01 04:33 -0400
 
Will slapping a keyboard affect its chips and keyswitches? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-02 13:54 +0800
 
1.44MB 磁碟容量的 32bit OS HamsterOS 預計今年 11 月上市 "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 18:56 +0800
 
Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage (79 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 12:21 +0800
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> 2026-06-27 06:14 +0100
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 13:27 +0800
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> 2026-06-27 06:42 +0100
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 13:49 +0800
       → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> 2026-06-27 07:03 +0100
         → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard... safe state? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 17:26 +0800
           → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard... safe state? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-06-27 10:36 +0100
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> 2026-06-27 07:46 +0200
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keybd ... "ON" & "OFF" labels "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 13:56 +0800
       → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keybd ... "ON" & "OFF" labels "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> 2026-06-27 08:41 +0200
         → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keybd ... flashing LED? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 17:38 +0800
         → Re: Discharging ... flashing LED & Muzzle Flash "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 22:53 +0800
         → Re: Discharging ... Flash, Muzzle, Recoil "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 23:00 +0800
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 13:57 +0800
       → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> 2026-06-27 09:09 +0200
         → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 20:24 +0800
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage druck <news@druck.org.uk> 2026-06-27 08:57 +0100
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage druck <news@druck.org.uk> 2026-06-27 09:04 +0100
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 17:41 +0800
       → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage druck <news@druck.org.uk> 2026-06-27 20:30 +0100
         → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 12:11 +0800
           → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-28 05:02 -0400
           → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-06-28 10:35 +0100
             → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 18:21 +0800
             → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-28 06:40 -0400
               → Re: Discharging ... fixed, hidden batteries "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 19:12 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... fixed, hidden batteries Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-28 10:37 -0400
                 → Re: Discharging ... Acer OKW132 mechanical keyboard "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 11:49 +0800
           → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-28 11:12 +0100
             → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 18:25 +0800
               → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-28 11:32 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 19:13 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-28 12:23 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> 2026-06-28 04:37 -0700
                 → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 19:59 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:46 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:45 +0100
           → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> 2026-06-28 16:29 +0100
             → Re: Discharging ... and aafe state batteries "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 11:52 +0800
         → Re: Discharging ... rechargeable batteries "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 12:13 +0800
           → Re: Discharging ... rechargeable batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-28 11:16 +0100
             → Re: Discharging ... rechargeable batteries "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 18:29 +0800
               → Re: Discharging ... rechargeable batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-28 11:33 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 19:14 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-28 12:23 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 20:00 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:47 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:53 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:59 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging ... Usenet go IPO??? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 20:04 +0800
           → sci.chem.electrochem.battery "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 20:12 +0800
             → Discharging fixed, hidden batteries "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 20:17 +0800
               → Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> 2026-06-28 16:19 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging ... trolling == cross-posting? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 00:13 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging.. The Matrix? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 12:08 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> 2026-06-29 08:57 -0400
                 → Re: Discharging ... seal "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 20:58 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... seal The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 14:02 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging ... SEAL! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 21:19 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... *plonk* plonked "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 01:41 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging ... *plonk* plonked Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> 2026-06-29 18:36 +0000
                 → Re: Discharging ... *plonk*? plonked?? glass??? CRT???? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 15:59 +0800
               → Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:48 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries ... dry cell?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:51 +0800
                 → Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries ... dry cell?? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:59 +0100
                 → Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries ... dry cell?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 20:07 +0800
             → Re: sci.chem.electrochem.battery Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-28 11:11 -0400
               → Re: sci.chem.electrochem.battery? sci.chem.physicalchem.battery? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 23:33 +0800
                 → Re: sci.chem.electrochem.battery? sci.chem.physicalchem.battery? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 12:06 +0800
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-27 06:01 -0400
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 18:07 +0800
       → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-27 08:13 -0400
       → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> 2026-06-27 18:33 +0000
         → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 20:28 +0800
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> 2026-06-28 16:18 +0100
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 00:05 +0800
     → Re: Discharging ... popcorn? plastic? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 01:39 +0800
   → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard ... DONE!!! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 00:25 +0800
     → Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard ... DONE!!! NO!!! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 13:02 +0800
 
Summer Wars - Official Trailer - YouTube (1 reply — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:25 +0800
   → Re: Summer Wars - Official Trailer - YouTube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:33 +0800
 
Re: Climatic change... and CPU ... power consumption (2 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 20:35 +0800
   → Re: Climatic change... and CPU ... power consumption Heinz Schmitz <sch@example.invalid> 2026-06-29 09:57 +0200
     → Re: Climatic change... and CPU ... power consumption "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:17 +0800
 
[HK01]USB插口五種顏色代表不同規格 藍黑白紫綠可辨別快充速度與廠商 "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 00:02 +0800
 
Fwd: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip (1 reply — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 19:19 +0800
   → [HK01]IBM研發首款0.7nm晶片 指甲大小塞滿1000億電晶體 效能飆升50% "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 00:01 +0800
 
Holy Light and laser "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 22:38 +0800
 
The Computer Circle "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-28 21:25 +0800
 
fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? (35 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 10:36 +0800
   → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> 2026-06-20 23:04 -0500
     → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-21 08:16 -0400
       → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 20:33 +0800
         → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 17:39 +0700
           → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 18:58 +0800
             → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> 2026-06-22 12:20 +0100
               → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? David Samuel Barr <dsbarr@mindspring.com> 2026-06-22 08:29 -0400
                 → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 21:38 +0800
                 → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 14:14 -0400
                 → Hop in, say something, BANG!! BANG!! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-23 02:52 +0800
                 → Re: Hop in, say something, BANG!! BANG!! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-23 03:22 +0800
           → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-06-22 21:25 +1000
             → Re: fabrication .... oldie english? class? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-23 01:40 +0800
       → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-06-21 23:06 +1000
     → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 10:51 -0400
       → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-06-21 15:42 +0000
         → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 13:16 +0800
         → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 13:53 +0800
       → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-06-22 17:59 +1000
         → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 18:50 +0800
           → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> 2026-06-22 12:57 +0100
             → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-06-22 22:51 +1000
               → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 21:43 +0800
                 → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-23 02:57 +0800
               → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> 2026-06-22 17:17 -0700
                 → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-06-23 20:24 +1000
                 → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> 2026-06-23 19:25 -0700
                 → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-06-24 02:40 +0000
                 → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> 2026-06-24 22:00 +1000
                 → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-06-24 19:06 +0000
             → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 21:42 +0800
             → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.too> 2026-06-22 17:17 -0700
           → Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> 2026-06-24 05:30 +0200
             → Re: fabrication ... chip? paper? seal? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-24 15:13 +0800
   → Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-21 05:54 -0400
 
Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? (19 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-19 22:00 +0800
   → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-19 16:00 -0400
     → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-19 18:40 -0600
       → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-20 02:40 -0400
     → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-20 11:49 +0800
       → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-20 02:48 -0400
         → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-20 18:17 +0800
         → Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-20 19:48 +0800
           → Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-20 10:48 -0400
             → Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 10:24 +0800
           → Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> 2026-06-20 20:14 +0200
             → Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 10:18 +0800
               → Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-21 06:34 -0400
                 → Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 19:34 +0800
                 → Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-22 01:53 -0400
                 → Re: Are chips ... electronics dies & releaas "magic smoke"?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-22 14:09 +0800
   → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> 2026-06-21 17:49 +0800
     → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-23 20:59 +0800
       → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-06-23 10:20 -0600
         → Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-24 00:28 +0800
 
Re: Linux started vs Windows started ! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 10:41 +0800
 
香港中古廣告: philips 飛利浦電視機(周潤發)1981 - YouTube (2 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-20 20:24 +0800
   → Re: ??????: philips ??????(???)1981 - YouTube legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> 2026-06-20 10:53 -0400
     → Can you break a seal? :) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-21 00:11 +0800
 
CVE-2022-38392: 5400 RPM hard drives resonant-frequency attack with music video (4 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-14 18:10 +0800
   → Re: CVE-2022-38392: 5400 RPM hard drives resonant-frequency attack with music video VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2026-06-14 20:24 -0500
     → Re: CVE-2022-38392: 5400 RPM hard drives resonant-frequency attack with music video Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-06-15 00:51 -0400
     → Re: CVE-2022-38392: 5400 RPM hard drives resonant-frequency attack with music video Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> 2026-06-19 17:48 +0800
       → Re: CVE-2022-38392: 5400 RPM hard drives resonant-frequency attack with music video "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-06-19 18:57 +0800

~Page 1 of ~100 (articles 44327–44515) Older →


csiph-web