Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #219113 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-29 09:04 -0500 |
| Last post | 2021-10-12 09:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 186 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:44 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-09-30 01:44 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-09-30 12:25 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 14:03 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-09-30 23:36 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 20:20 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-09-30 14:45 -1000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 06:30 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:48 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-01 13:47 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 17:56 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-01 22:07 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 20:49 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:03 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 10:49 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 15:13 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:35 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:34 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:50 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 05:52 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet chris <chris-nospam@tridac.net> - 2021-10-20 00:00 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:13 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:48 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 22:23 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 16:07 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:06 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 19:55 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 22:17 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 08:15 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-02 13:29 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-02 07:53 -1000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-02 18:58 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:27 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-03 15:34 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 01:05 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-10-03 00:24 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 00:13 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-10-05 20:14 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-04 14:17 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 16:42 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-04 17:17 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 16:38 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:10 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 00:11 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 08:31 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 11:34 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 17:31 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-06 09:31 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-08 18:53 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 17:41 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 20:58 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 06:38 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 01:26 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 08:12 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 03:41 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-05 23:04 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 06:48 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 14:17 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 23:03 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-06 04:58 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:59 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:00 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-11-25 20:13 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-26 04:02 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Geeknix <usenet@apple.geeknix135.net> - 2021-11-26 07:41 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-26 21:01 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kurt Weiske" <kurt.weiske@realitycheckbbs.org.remove-vck-this> - 2021-11-26 09:42 -0800
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet sidd@situ.com - 2021-10-16 06:40 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-16 09:14 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-16 13:19 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-17 17:31 -1000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-23 09:52 -1000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet lawrenabae@abaluon.abaom (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-10-01 16:26 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-10-01 23:19 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-09-30 18:38 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 19:26 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-30 21:39 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-01 21:32 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 20:31 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:24 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 11:12 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:09 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-02 18:32 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 20:41 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:40 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-03 13:31 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-03 22:57 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:06 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 14:11 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 10:28 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 10:44 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:21 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 15:29 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 11:04 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet lawrence@cluon.com (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-10-04 13:42 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ulick Magee <ulickmagee@feckoff.invalid> - 2021-11-09 23:55 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-11-09 20:44 -0600
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 06:22 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:55 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:13 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:26 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:11 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet sidd@situ.com - 2021-10-16 07:01 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Wayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net> - 2021-10-13 18:39 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-13 17:58 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Wayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net> - 2021-10-14 09:25 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-14 15:29 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-14 14:27 -1000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-15 10:07 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-16 02:53 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-16 15:34 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Wayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net> - 2021-10-18 10:55 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 17:30 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-01 18:27 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:46 +0200
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:26 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-02 01:12 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 11:08 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:31 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-04 14:19 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-05 07:36 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 09:30 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-05 10:07 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 12:57 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-05 13:48 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 10:08 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-29 16:25 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:17 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> - 2021-09-29 15:56 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-09-29 17:22 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:22 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 13:27 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 12:58 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-30 19:12 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 13:16 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 15:59 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 17:38 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-29 17:36 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:32 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:25 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 10:57 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-02 22:07 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:07 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 11:46 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-03 18:14 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:35 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 14:28 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-06 15:55 +0300
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-06 14:35 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:37 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-07 07:04 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 18:30 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-07 08:47 -0400
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-07 13:07 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:16 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-08 00:08 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:50 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:32 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:38 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-07 17:42 +0300
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:26 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 23:44 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:23 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:27 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:56 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:58 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-07 20:01 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-08 00:54 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-12 12:23 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 13:35 -0500
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-12 16:16 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-13 00:17 +0000
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-12 20:00 -0700
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-13 17:48 +0100
Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:38 -0500
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 00:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjm10b$lql$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219382 |
On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: > 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. > > Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one > that long. I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support for UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 07:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20211007070401.628720edb6d57d9b041b99a3@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #219396 |
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 00:37:14 -0500 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 > words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. There is an RFC that suggests a limit of four lines for the sig, it is commonly followed. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 18:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <21H7J.52908$3p3.13935@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #219400 |
On 2021-10-07, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 00:37:14 -0500 > 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > >> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 >> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. > > There is an RFC that suggests a limit of four lines for the sig, it > is commonly followed. > Well, I changed now to three, as one should be blank line :P -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 08:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sjmq86$479$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #219396 |
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: > On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >> >> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >> that long. > > I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support for > UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. > > https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding > > Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up > with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. So early in the morning and what do I read? BLASPHEMY! Be gone heretic. GNUS handles UTF 8 just fine. > Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 > words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. Words? It's lines, not words. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 13:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sjmrfd$649$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #219396 |
In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using >>> Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never >>> considered it dead. >> >> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with >> one that long. > > I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support > for UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. > > https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding > > Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught > up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not. In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 18:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjnv29$q31$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219406 |
On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote: > In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using >>>> Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never >>>> considered it dead. >>> >>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with >>> one that long. >> >> I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support >> for UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. >> >> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding >> >> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught >> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. > > A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche > software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not. > > In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed. And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook." -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-08 00:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sjo254$87e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #219414 |
In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote: >> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using >>>>> Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never >>>>> considered it dead. >>>> >>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with >>>> one that long. >>> >>> I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support >>> for UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. >>> >>> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding >>> >>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught >>> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. >> >> A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche >> software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not. >> >> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed. > > And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook." Plonk You've likely joined several other group members kill files tonight. Enjoy talking to a group that is no longer listening.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 20:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjo82n$1enf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219419 |
On 10/7/21 7:08 PM, Rich wrote: > In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >> On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote: >>> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using >>>>>> Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never >>>>>> considered it dead. >>>>> >>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with >>>>> one that long. >>>> >>>> I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support >>>> for UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. >>>> >>>> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding >>>> >>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught >>>> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. >>> >>> A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche >>> software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not. >>> >>> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed. >> >> And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook." > > Plonk > > You've likely joined several other group members kill files tonight. > > Enjoy talking to a group that is no longer listening. What are you talking about? You don't listen, anyway. You hear only what you want to hear, and you believe only what you want to believe. That's what this beta male shit test exercise on my signature is showing. I enjoy talking to men, not whiners. Sig is not just short for 'signature.' Sig is also short for 'Sigma.' By attacking my signature you are attacking my identity, showing yourself to be a collectivist and conformist. While attacking my identity, and passively demanding me to comply, you are showing your lack thereof. "Everything was fine until you showed up." "You don't know what love is. You do as your told. Just as a child at ten might act but you're far too old." SIGMA 711 GIBZ 0FUX 2DAY & 4EVR -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-12 09:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sk4688$4aa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219419 |
On 10/7/21 7:08 PM, Rich wrote: >>> In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed. >> >> And the whole tribe gathered around and chanted, "ook, ook." > > Plonk > > You've likely joined several other group members kill files tonight. > > Enjoy talking to a group that is no longer listening. I am so sorry I have offended you. Please don't ostracize me. The most important thing in the world to me is being accepted by total strangers with an axe to grind! See below, I have changed my signature to conform to your signature standards, so it is no longer obnoxious. -- 凸( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ook ( ͡⚆ ͜ʖ ͡⚆)╭∩╮ ook 凸(｀⌒´メ)凸 0FUX4U - Ooga booga I hope the massah will reconsider my inclusion in his authoritarian Usenet plantation. Geez thanx boss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 18:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjo0br$1928$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219406 |
On 10/7/21 8:07 AM, Rich wrote: > In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using >>>> Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never >>>> considered it dead. >>> >>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with >>> one that long. >> >> I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support >> for UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob. >> >> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding >> >> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught >> up with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. > > A sig can be obnoxious regardless of whether a reader is using niche > software or not or viewing it as UTF-8 or not. > > In your case your sig *is* obnoxious no matter how it is viewed. No, it is not obnoxious. This tribalist compliance testing is obnoxious. -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 17:42 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <87k0iodhg5.fsf@zotaspaz.fatphil.org> |
| In reply to | #219396 |
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: > On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >> >> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >> that long. > > Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up > with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. False. > Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 > words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice. Phil (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say that perhaps I lurked too long.) -- I find the easiest thing to do is to k/f myself and just troll away -- David Melville on r.a.s.f1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 18:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjnvlh$11u2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219407 |
On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: > 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >>> >>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >>> that long. >> >> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up >> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. > > False. > >> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 >> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. > > There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the > otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise > to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you > thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following > Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice. > > Phil > (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say > that perhaps I lurked too long.) You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is laughable. Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious. The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in tribal female shit tests. Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 23:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rDL7J.62762$md6.30988@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #219415 |
On 2021-10-07, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >>>> >>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >>>> that long. >>> >>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up >>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. >> >> False. >> >>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 >>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. >> >> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the >> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise >> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you >> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following >> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice. >> >> Phil >> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say >> that perhaps I lurked too long.) > > You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is > laughable. > > Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed > as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and > whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious. > > The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text > wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in > tribal female shit tests. > > Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. > FREEDOOOOM! -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 20:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjo6gj$11q2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219417 |
On 10/7/21 6:44 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: > On 2021-10-07, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >> On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >>>>> >>>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >>>>> that long. >>>> >>>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up >>>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. >>> >>> False. >>> >>>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 >>>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. >>> >>> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the >>> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise >>> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you >>> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following >>> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice. >>> >>> Phil >>> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say >>> that perhaps I lurked too long.) >> >> You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is >> laughable. >> >> Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed >> as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and >> whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious. >> >> The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text >> wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in >> tribal female shit tests. >> >> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. >> > FREEDOOOOM! "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our SIGNATURES!" -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-08 01:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <E7N7J.24001$d82.5613@fx21.iad> |
| In reply to | #219422 |
On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. >>> >> FREEDOOOOM! > > "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And > dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade > all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to > come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but > they will never take our SIGNATURES!" > Heh, do you know I work for spooks, for REAL :P usenet is FREEDOM, and that is freedom from ALL RULES, that is FREEDOM to speak SWEARING WORDS :P -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 20:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjo8f2$1hhj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219423 |
On 10/7/21 8:27 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: > On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >>>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. >>>> >>> FREEDOOOOM! >> >> "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And >> dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade >> all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to >> come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but >> they will never take our SIGNATURES!" >> > Heh, do you know I work for spooks, for REAL :P > usenet is FREEDOM, and that is freedom from ALL RULES, > that is FREEDOM to speak SWEARING WORDS :P Whatever is clever. They got what they deserved. Spooky Mart is the world's only supplier of unpasteurized pig milk. -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-08 01:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rBN7J.96849$Dr.60654@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #219425 |
On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > On 10/7/21 8:27 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >> On 2021-10-08, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >>>>> Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. >>>>> >>>> FREEDOOOOM! >>> >>> "Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And >>> dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade >>> all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to >>> come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but >>> they will never take our SIGNATURES!" >>> >> Heh, do you know I work for spooks, for REAL :P >> usenet is FREEDOM, and that is freedom from ALL RULES, >> that is FREEDOM to speak SWEARING WORDS :P > > Whatever is clever. They got what they deserved. > > Spooky Mart is the world's only supplier of unpasteurized pig milk. > LOVE&PEACE to EVERYONE :P -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-07 20:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <972649143.655354693.944599.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #219415 |
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: > On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >>>> >>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >>>> that long. >>> >>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up >>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. >> >> False. >> >>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 >>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. >> >> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the >> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise >> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you >> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following >> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice. >> >> Phil >> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say >> that perhaps I lurked too long.) > > You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is > laughable. > > Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed > as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and > whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious. > > The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text > wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in > tribal female shit tests. > > Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. > I can’t even figure out what your .sig is supposed to represent. -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-08 00:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sjomdh$1mfb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #219427 |
On 10/7/21 10:01 PM, Peter Flass wrote: > I can’t even figure out what your .sig is supposed to represent. This might help. Message-ID: <sc8e04$49t$1@gioia.aioe.org> Message-ID: <sc8e7n$a1e$1@gioia.aioe.org> Message-ID: <sc8eh3$cnm$1@gioia.aioe.org> Message-ID: <sc8f20$gvu$1@gioia.aioe.org> Message-ID: <sc8fdh$k40$1@gioia.aioe.org> -- ███████████████████████████████████ █░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███ █░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███ [chan] 711 █░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███ spooky mart ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ always open ██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███ stay spooky ██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█ https://bitmessage.org ██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█ ██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█ ███████████████████████████████████
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-12 12:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <c3hbmg90j4vkvl2mgudo2vr8uecf5jus0n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #219415 |
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 18:26:33 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote: >On 10/7/21 9:42 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>> On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote: >>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes: >>>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet. >>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead. >>>> >>>> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one >>>> that long. >>> >>> Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up >>> with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious. >> >> False. >> >>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50 >>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig. >> >> There's a certain poetry to having you embarass yourself so in the >> otherwise hallowed company of a.f.c. I of course have to apologise >> to the readership thereof for encouraging another post from you >> thereto, and will ensure I don't do the same again by following >> Richard Heathfield's subliminal advice. >> >> Phil >> (Usenet noob, only reading since 1990, posting since 1993, some may say >> that perhaps I lurked too long.) > >You are a fragile, self-important pointilist. Your compliance testing is >laughable. > >Giving zero fucks about your pointless pointilist opinion can be viewed >as obnoxious, too. My signature is not obnoxious. Your goading and >whining and bitching about it is what's truly obnoxious. > >The Ubernummer sig is cooler than your crufty, outdated, 90s style text >wall sigs. I'm not playing with a bunch of clown men who engage in >tribal female shit tests. > >Go shit in a sock and beat yourself with it. Lots of male egos around. I once used a 'non-standard' quote symbol. My use of it is still out there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web