Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #151266
| From | "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: New hard drive |
| Date | 2015-09-12 05:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d5gnjoFjei6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mstass$3vb$2@dont-email.me> <d5g6nnFf5u4U1@mid.individual.net><1%BIx.48652$lq4.42332@fx10.iad> <msus31$v06$1@dont-email.me> |
"Dan Espen" <despen@verizon.net> wrote in message news:msus31$v06$1@dont-email.me... > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > >> "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> writes: >>>Does anyone have any idea at all as to what the raw error rate is on a >>>current 4 TB drive? That is before ECC and whatever other magic is >>>applied >>>to it. ISTM the signal must be meaured in nanovolts. >> >> # smartctl --all /dev/sdc >> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED >> WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE >> 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 108 099 006 Pre-fail >> s - 19125192 >> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail >> s - 0 >> 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 063 060 030 Pre-fail >> s - 1897873 > ... >> SMART Error Log Version: 1 >> No Errors Logged > These numbers have never been clear to me. Yes, they are quite complex. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T. > How can the worst be 99, but the value 108? > I would have thought 108 is cumulative since the last clear, No. > but there's no evidence of any time period that I can see. > Also, the "raw" value is in the millions. The raw value is mostly what it says, the actual number of occurrences of that field, but not with the Raw_Read_Error_Rate with Seagate drives, that field is in fact an encoded field. > I have 2 1TB hard drives and 1 128G SDD. > > The SSD shows some pretty good numbers: > > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED > WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 And that shows that that field is done quite different in non Seagate drives. > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 48 That one isn't clock hours either. > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 32 > 160 Uncorrectable_Error_Cnt 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 161 Valid_Spare_Block_Cnt 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 45 > 163 Initial_Bad_Block_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 24 > 164 Total_Erase_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 1425 > 165 Max_Erase_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 6 > 166 Min_Erase_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 167 Average_Erase_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 1 > 168 Max_Erase_Count_of_Spec 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 3000 > 169 Remaining_Lifetime_Perc 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 100 > 175 Program_Fail_Count_Chip 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 176 Erase_Fail_Count_Chip 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0000 100 100 050 Old_age > line - 0 > 178 Runtime_Invalid_Blk_Cnt 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 181 Program_Fail_Cnt_Total 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 182 Erase_Fail_Count_Total 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 15 > 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 23 > 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0000 100 100 016 Old_age > line - 0 > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 0 > 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0000 100 100 050 Old_age > line - 639 > 232 Available_Reservd_Space 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 100 > 241 Host_Writes_32MiB 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 3328 > 242 Host_Reads_32MiB 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 2900 > 245 Unkn_SiliconMotion_Attr 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > line - 5700 > > But now I know I don't understand the output. > > The 2 1TB drives get remounted read only all summer long. > They don't like the heat in my office. > Still, smart doesn't give me any hints. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-10 20:33 -0500
Re: New hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-10 23:23 -0400
Re: New hard drive Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2015-09-11 07:07 +0100
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 10:20 -0500
Re: New hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-14 13:53 -0400
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 13:05 -0500
Re: New hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-14 15:09 -0400
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 14:18 -0500
Re: New hard drive Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-09-15 10:08 +0100
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-15 05:28 -0500
Re: New hard drive Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2015-09-15 13:43 +0200
Re: New hard drive Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-15 16:19 +0000
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-15 13:15 -0500
Re: New hard drive Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-09-16 07:04 +0000
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-16 08:39 -0500
Re: New hard drive Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-16 14:52 +0000
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-17 15:37 -0500
Re: New hard drive scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-09-16 13:42 +0000
Re: New hard drive Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-15 15:34 -0400
Re: New hard drive Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-09-15 17:29 -0400
Re: New hard drive Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 22:00 +0000
Re: New hard drive Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-17 03:58 +0000
Re: New hard drive "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-17 00:43 -0500
Re: New hard drive Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-17 05:59 +0000
Re: New hard drive Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 11:51 +0000
Re: New hard drive hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-17 13:18 -0700
Re: New hard drive Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-17 19:15 -0400
Re: New hard drive "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-20 17:27 +1000
Re: New hard drive hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-17 13:13 -0700
Re: New hard drive Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-17 06:24 -0400
Re: New hard drive Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 11:51 +0000
Re: New hard drive Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-17 18:02 +0000
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-15 13:12 -0500
Re: New hard drive Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 22:00 +0000
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-17 19:29 -0500
Re: New hard drive "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 10:29 +0100
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-17 19:31 -0500
Re: New hard drive Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-15 16:19 +0000
Re: New hard drive Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-15 17:48 +0000
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-15 13:17 -0500
Re: New hard drive "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-09-11 09:28 -0500
Re: New hard drive scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-09-11 14:59 +0000
Re: New hard drive Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-09-11 11:32 -0400
Re: New hard drive Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-09-11 16:06 +0000
Re: New hard drive scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-09-11 16:06 +0000
Re: New hard drive "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-12 05:21 +1000
Re: New hard drive "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-12 05:16 +1000
Re: New hard drive "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-09-11 10:42 -0500
Re: New hard drive scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-09-11 16:09 +0000
Re: New hard drive Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-09-11 12:20 -0400
Re: New hard drive "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-12 05:18 +1000
Re: New hard drive "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-12 05:08 +1000
Re: New hard drive "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-11 14:34 -0500
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-15 05:29 -0500
Re: New hard drive terry+googleblog@tmk.com - 2015-09-11 16:05 -0700
Re: New hard drive Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2015-09-11 11:55 -0400
Re: New hard drive Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2015-09-11 14:42 -0300
Re: New hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-11 16:10 -0400
Re: New hard drive Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-09-11 15:07 -0700
Re: New hard drive sidd@situ.com (sidd) - 2015-09-12 15:34 -0400
Re: New hard drive Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-09-12 12:56 -0700
Re: New hard drive Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-09-12 13:02 -0700
Re: New hard drive "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-09-11 14:39 -0500
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 10:25 -0500
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 10:22 -0500
Re: New hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-14 13:49 -0400
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 13:07 -0500
Re: New hard drive hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-09-14 11:10 -0700
Re: New hard drive philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-09-14 14:45 -0500
csiph-web