Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2912936 > unrolled thread

NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop

Back to article view | Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

Contents

  NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-26 20:41 -0400
    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-27 00:56 +0000
      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-28 11:02 -0400
        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 12:03 +0000
          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-29 11:34 -0700
            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-03-29 21:56 +0000
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 18:05 -0400
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-29 21:16 -0700
          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-29 18:08 -0400
            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 22:29 +0000
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 18:36 -0400
                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-29 16:45 -0600
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 18:48 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-29 17:49 -0600
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 23:06 +0000
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 19:08 -0400
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 23:25 +0000
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 19:42 -0400
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-29 17:50 -0600
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-29 23:55 +0000
                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 01:35 +0000
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 21:38 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 01:41 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 02:39 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-30 06:56 -0400
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 11:19 +0000
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 11:08 -0700
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 19:09 +0000
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 15:20 -0400
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 19:46 +0000
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 16:03 -0400
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 20:30 +0000
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:41 -0600
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 01:38 -0400
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:05 -0600
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 14:35 -0700
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-30 22:04 +0000
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 17:00 -0700
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on) - 2025-03-31 01:08 +0100
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 20:13 -0400
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-31 00:12 +0000
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 01:39 -0400
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 02:16 -0400
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2025-03-31 08:55 +0000
                                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 09:10 -0400
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-31 06:48 -0700
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 01:37 -0400
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-31 23:53 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 13:57 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-30 02:25 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 14:46 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:04 -0600
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-03-30 13:10 -0700
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-03-30 14:01 -0700
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-03-30 18:48 -0700
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-03-31 08:09 -0700
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-03-31 11:29 -0700
                                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-04-02 14:47 -0700
                                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-04-02 15:22 -0700
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-04-02 15:37 -0700
                                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop "Jack" <j@yohoo.com> - 2025-04-03 04:25 +0000
                                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Swastika New Mexico <brilliant@co.colfax.nm> - 2025-04-04 02:30 +0000
                                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Swastika New Mexico <brilliant@co.colfax.nm> - 2025-04-04 02:28 +0000
                                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-04-03 21:24 -0700
                                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-04-04 07:39 -0600
                                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Weil Fine <weil.fine@fl.us> - 2025-04-05 18:22 +0000
                                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop "Terry Miles" <terry.miles@yohoo.com> - 2025-03-31 19:36 +0000
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-31 01:14 +0000
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop "P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-31 23:53 +0000
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 19:57 -0400
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-01 00:14 +0000
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-01 00:34 -0400
                                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-04-01 05:42 -0600
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 16:31 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:42 -0600
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-31 08:40 -0400
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 09:11 -0400
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-31 08:36 -0600
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-31 22:50 +0000
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 06:54 -0600
                  Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-30 11:28 -0400
                    Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-30 15:40 +0000
                      Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-30 15:27 -0400
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 14:08 -0600
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 14:35 -0700
                        Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-31 01:31 +0000
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-03-31 01:58 +0000
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 02:24 -0400
                              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-31 08:36 -0400
                          Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-31 20:41 -0400
                            Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-01 01:13 +0000
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-03-30 02:14 +0000
                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-30 06:55 -0600
              Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-30 11:27 -0400
                Re: NPR Admits They Didn't Cover The Hunter Biden Laptop Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 14:35 -0700
    Re: NPR Admits – No J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2025-03-26 18:48 -0700
      Re: NPR Admits ? No Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-26 19:51 -0600
        Re: NPR Admits ? No Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2025-03-26 19:04 -0700
          Re: NPR Admits ? No "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.fagot@fagmail.org> - 2025-03-27 02:31 +0000
            Re: NPR Admits ? No .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 07:06 -0500
          Re: NPR Admits ? No .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 23:25 -0500
      Re: NPR Admits – No .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 00:50 -0500

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

#2914524

On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>
>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>
>>
>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>
>> Get with it.
>>
> 
> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
> viewers find nothing of value.
> 
> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
> interruption.
> 
> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
> 

And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund, 
but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914525

On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>
>>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>
>>>
>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>
>>> Get with it.
>>>
>> 
>> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>> viewers find nothing of value.
>> 
>> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>> interruption.
>> 
>> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>> 
>
> And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund, 
> but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s
>
>
> -hh

When Trump stops the funding we are getting a "refund" of sorts because our
tax dollars will no longer be funding this lefty garbage.
And that's the point.
Not how much.
Not what programs are fairly balanced or lean one way or the other.
In this case, one bad apple spoils the bunch.

The smart people are leaving NPR because they realize it is biased left.
Like this senior NPR editor for example.
<https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-accusing-outlet-liberal-bias-rcna148258>
If NPR was truly unbiased, this person wouldn't be penalized for writing an
essay for the Free Press.



-- 
pothead
Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Treat it accordingly
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914580

On 3/30/25 11:40, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>>
>>>> Get with it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>>> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>>> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>>> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>>> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>>> viewers find nothing of value.
>>>
>>> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>>> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>>> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>>> interruption.
>>>
>>> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>>
>>
>> And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund,
>> but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s
>>
>>
>> -hh
> 
> When Trump stops the funding we are getting a "refund" of sorts because our
> tax dollars will no longer be funding this lefty garbage.

You'll get no such refund.

> And that's the point.
> Not how much.

Oh, I understand your alleged 'principle' on this, but if the amount of 
money was actually significant to you personally, you would have taken 
up the offer to be reimbursed.

The real point is that there's invariably many things that a government 
or institution does which one may not 100.00% agree with, but to try to 
be petulant about that is very childish.


> Not what programs are fairly balanced or lean one way or the other.
> In this case, one bad apple spoils the bunch.

If that were really true, you'd be calling for Trump to be hanged.


> The smart people are leaving NPR because they realize it is biased left.
> Like this senior NPR editor for example.
> <https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-accusing-outlet-liberal-bias-rcna148258>

Gosh, you've found **one** malcontent - - and they resigned after they 
were suspended for violating their terms of employment.


> If NPR was truly unbiased, this person wouldn't be penalized for writing an
> essay for the Free Press.

They were penalized because they violated their employment contract's 
terms .. and as someone was just preaching about "one bad apple spoils 
the bunch", a violation is a violation is a violation, so Berliner had 
utterly no excuse for his decision to violate his contract.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914598

In article <vsc5ub$26i7i$1@dont-email.me>, 
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> 
> On 3/30/25 11:40, pothead wrote:
> > On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >> On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> >>> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
> >>>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
> >>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
> >>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
> >>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
> >>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
> >>>>
> >>>> Get with it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
> >>> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
> >>> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
> >>> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
> >>> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
> >>> viewers find nothing of value.
> >>>
> >>> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
> >>> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
> >>> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
> >>> interruption.
> >>>
> >>> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
> >>> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
> >>>
> >>
> >> And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund,
> >> but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s
> >>
> >>
> >> -hh
> > 
> > When Trump stops the funding we are getting a "refund" of sorts because our
> > tax dollars will no longer be funding this lefty garbage.
> 
> You'll get no such refund.

You might not anyway.
> 
> > And that's the point.
> > Not how much.
> 
> Oh, I understand your alleged 'principle' on this, but if the amount of 
> money was actually significant to you personally, you would have taken 
> up the offer to be reimbursed.

Huh?
> 
> The real point is that there's invariably many things that a government 
> or institution does which one may not 100.00% agree with, but to try to 
> be petulant about that is very childish.

What?
> 
> 
> > Not what programs are fairly balanced or lean one way or the other.
> > In this case, one bad apple spoils the bunch.
> 
> If that were really true, you'd be calling for Trump to be hanged.

Why?
> 
> 
> > The smart people are leaving NPR because they realize it is biased left.
> > Like this senior NPR editor for example.
> > <https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-accusing-outlet-liberal-bias-rcna148258>
> 
> Gosh, you've found **one** malcontent - - and they resigned after they 
> were suspended for violating their terms of employment.

They fucked up.
> 
> 
> > If NPR was truly unbiased, this person wouldn't be penalized for writing an
> > essay for the Free Press.
> 
> They were penalized because they violated their employment contract's 
> terms .. and as someone was just preaching about "one bad apple spoils 
> the bunch", a violation is a violation is a violation, so Berliner had 
> utterly no excuse for his decision to violate his contract.

So Trump firing incompetent employees shouldn't matter.
> 
> 
> -hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914638

On 30/3/25 12:27, -hh wrote:

>> If NPR was truly unbiased, this person wouldn't be penalized
>> for writing an
>> essay for the Free Press.
>
> They were penalized because they violated their employment
> contract's terms .. and as someone was just preaching about "one
> bad apple spoils the bunch", a violation is a violation is a
> violation, so Berliner had utterly no excuse for his decision to
> violate his contract.

The Newshour proves its bias by no longer having Doris Kearns 
Goodwin.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914741

On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 3/30/25 11:40, pothead wrote:
>> On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>>>> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>>>
>>>>> Get with it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>>>> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>>>> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>>>> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>>>> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>>>> viewers find nothing of value.
>>>>
>>>> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>>>> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>>>> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>>>> interruption.
>>>>
>>>> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>>> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund,
>>> but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>> 
>> When Trump stops the funding we are getting a "refund" of sorts because our
>> tax dollars will no longer be funding this lefty garbage.
>
> You'll get no such refund.

Refund in quotes.


>> And that's the point.
>> Not how much.
>
> Oh, I understand your alleged 'principle' on this, but if the amount of 
> money was actually significant to you personally, you would have taken 
> up the offer to be reimbursed.

Of course I would take the offer, however what's more important to me is
where my tax money is being spent.


> The real point is that there's invariably many things that a government 
> or institution does which one may not 100.00% agree with, but to try to 
> be petulant about that is very childish.

Promoting one side or the other when a government funded, no matter how small,
cause is supposed to be independent is wrong.
I don't want my tax dollars going to pay for promoting Sesame Street in some
middle eastern country either.

>
>> Not what programs are fairly balanced or lean one way or the other.
>> In this case, one bad apple spoils the bunch.
>
> If that were really true, you'd be calling for Trump to be hanged.

Nope.
Unlike you leftists, I don't tow the Trump line nor the republican line for
that matter.
I agree with some of what he is doing and disagree with others.

Leftists rarely admit that the other side is making progress nor do they admit when
their side is screwing things up.
The last 4 years of the left covering for Biden is proof positive of that.
Hell, Kamala was installed and coroneted and you guys just accepted it.
The media lied to you for 4+ years and you accepted it.
etc.


>> The smart people are leaving NPR because they realize it is biased left.
>> Like this senior NPR editor for example.
>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-accusing-outlet-liberal-bias-rcna148258>
>
> Gosh, you've found **one** malcontent - - and they resigned after they 
> were suspended for violating their terms of employment.

Yea like not asking if he can expose NPR for what it really is without
asking for permission first.
and this guy was a senior editor.

Oh there are plenty more.

<https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-lm&channel=entpr&q=employees+leaving+NPR>

<https://www.google.com/search?q=employees+leaving+pbs&client=firefox-b-1-lm&sca_esv=8b98ab6cb8bf8b85&channel=entpr&ei=ne7pZ_mTH7CviLMPi7jjiAg&ved=0ahUKEwi51uuplLOMAxWwF2IAHQvcGIEQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=employees+leaving+pbs&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiFWVtcGxveWVlcyBsZWF2aW5nIHBiczIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwUyBRAhGJ8FMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwVI0Q5QowdYwwtwAXgBkAEAmAFXoAH2AaoBATO4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgSgApECwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICBhAAGBYYHpgDAIgGAZAGCJIHATSgB-8V&sclient=gws-wiz-serp>

They see the writing on the wall.
The same thing is happening at WAPO and NYT as well.
>
>> If NPR was truly unbiased, this person wouldn't be penalized for writing an
>> essay for the Free Press.
>
> They were penalized because they violated their employment contract's 
> terms .. and as someone was just preaching about "one bad apple spoils 
> the bunch", a violation is a violation is a violation, so Berliner had 
> utterly no excuse for his decision to violate his contract.

See above.
He let the cat out of the bag and NPR didn't like it.
so much for fair and unbiased journalism.

BTW he received a firestorm of support on social media.

>
> -hh



-- 
pothead
Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Treat it accordingly
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914754

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vscr8k$2q87m$7@dont-email.me: 


> Unlike you leftists, I don't tow the Trump line nor the republican
> line for that matter.



   Show us any post where you have 
opposed what Trump said or did. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914819

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 01:58:03 +0000, Mitchell Holman  wrote:
>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote
>> Unlike you leftists, I don't tow the Trump line nor the republican
>> line for that matter.
>
>   Show us any post where you have 
>opposed what Trump said or did. 

She does on occasion disagree on minor side issues but on all his
major points, she's right there with him.

From Bill Maher:

Musk said that the biggest military waste was on obsolete weapons.
Invoking, "in this age of drones",  Musk complains the F-35 is
obsolete and the program should be canceled.  

Meanwhile ... Trump says we've building a new fighter, the "F-47" and
'we're buying a lot - I can't tell you the price'.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914915

Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 01:58:03 +0000, Mitchell Holman  wrote:
>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote
>>> Unlike you leftists, I don't tow the Trump line nor the republican
>>> line for that matter.
>>
>>   Show us any post where you have 
>>opposed what Trump said or did. 
>
> She does on occasion disagree on minor side issues but on all his
> major points, she's right there with him.
>
> From Bill Maher:
>
> Musk said that the biggest military waste was on obsolete weapons.
> Invoking, "in this age of drones",  Musk complains the F-35 is
> obsolete and the program should be canceled.  

Musk is Trump with half a brain.

> Meanwhile ... Trump says we've building a new fighter, the "F-47" and
> 'we're buying a lot - I can't tell you the price'.
>
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!

I agree with the sentiment... F-47!  :-D

-- 
It's better to be wanted for murder that not to be wanted at all.
		-- Marty Winch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2915119

On 3/30/25 21:31, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/30/25 11:40, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>>>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>>>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>>>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>>>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>>>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>>>>> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>>>>> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>>>>> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>>>>> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>>>>> viewers find nothing of value.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>>>>> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>>>>> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>>>>> interruption.
>>>>>
>>>>> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>>>> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund,
>>>> but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> When Trump stops the funding we are getting a "refund" of sorts because our
>>> tax dollars will no longer be funding this lefty garbage.
>>
>> You'll get no such refund.
> 
> Refund in quotes.
> 
> 
>>> And that's the point.
>>> Not how much.
>>
>> Oh, I understand your alleged 'principle' on this, but if the amount of
>> money was actually significant to you personally, you would have taken
>> up the offer to be reimbursed.
> 
> Of course I would take the offer, however what's more important to me is
> where my tax money is being spent.
> 
> 
>> The real point is that there's invariably many things that a government
>> or institution does which one may not 100.00% agree with, but to try to
>> be petulant about that is very childish.
> 
> Promoting one side or the other when a government funded, no matter how small,
> cause is supposed to be independent is wrong.
> I don't want my tax dollars going to pay for promoting Sesame Street in some
> middle eastern country either.
> 
>>
>>> Not what programs are fairly balanced or lean one way or the other.
>>> In this case, one bad apple spoils the bunch.
>>
>> If that were really true, you'd be calling for Trump to be hanged.
> 
> Nope.
> Unlike you leftists, I don't tow the Trump line nor the republican line for
> that matter.
> I agree with some of what he is doing and disagree with others.
> 
> Leftists rarely admit that the other side is making progress nor do they admit when
> their side is screwing things up.
> The last 4 years of the left covering for Biden is proof positive of that.
> Hell, Kamala was installed and coroneted and you guys just accepted it.
> The media lied to you for 4+ years and you accepted it.
> etc.
> 
> 
>>> The smart people are leaving NPR because they realize it is biased left.
>>> Like this senior NPR editor for example.
>>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-accusing-outlet-liberal-bias-rcna148258>
>>
>> Gosh, you've found **one** malcontent - - and they resigned after they
>> were suspended for violating their terms of employment.
> 
> Yea like not asking if he can expose NPR for what it really is without
> asking for permission first.
> and this guy was a senior editor.

What matters is what his work contract says.  That's why they were able 
to discipline him prior to him quitting.

> 
> Oh there are plenty more.
> 
> <https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-lm&channel=entpr&q=employees+leaving+NPR>
> 
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=employees+leaving+pbs&client=firefox-b-1-lm&sca_esv=8b98ab6cb8bf8b85&channel=entpr&ei=ne7pZ_mTH7CviLMPi7jjiAg&ved=0ahUKEwi51uuplLOMAxWwF2IAHQvcGIEQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=employees+leaving+pbs&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiFWVtcGxveWVlcyBsZWF2aW5nIHBiczIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwUyBRAhGJ8FMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwVI0Q5QowdYwwtwAXgBkAEAmAFXoAH2AaoBATO4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgSgApECwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICBhAAGBYYHpgDAIgGAZAGCJIHATSgB-8V&sclient=gws-wiz-serp>

I don't see actual names with cases ...those are just blind searches.


> They see the writing on the wall.
> The same thing is happening at WAPO and NYT as well.

There's always disagreements; the NYT lost McNeil a few years ago over a 
stupidly trumped up bias claim from an entitled college kid who asked 
for the unvarnished truth because they then got the unvarnished truth.


>>> If NPR was truly unbiased, this person wouldn't be penalized for writing an
>>> essay for the Free Press.
>>
>> They were penalized because they violated their employment contract's
>> terms .. and as someone was just preaching about "one bad apple spoils
>> the bunch", a violation is a violation is a violation, so Berliner had
>> utterly no excuse for his decision to violate his contract.
> 
> See above.

No change.  He violated his contract terms.  I've similarly worked jobs 
where any outside employment were subject to employer scrutiny/approval.

> He let the cat out of the bag and NPR didn't like it.
> so much for fair and unbiased journalism.

Except that if it really was that bad, Berliner could have indemnified 
himself if other malcontents quit at the same time too.  That didn't 
happen, which undermines his claimed complaint: he was the outlier.


> BTW he received a firestorm of support on social media.

Which was on Twitter, so what percentage of that 'support' was actually 
from fake/troll accounts?  50%? 80%?  Higher?


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2915129

On 2025-04-01, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 3/30/25 21:31, pothead wrote:
>> On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/30/25 11:40, pothead wrote:https://nypost.com/2025/03/27/opinion/how-trump-is-ending-the-most-obscene-biden-border-policy-and-saving-kids/
>>>> On 2025-03-30, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 3/29/25 21:35, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-03-29, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
>>>>>>>> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just stop, crazy person, it's not "garbage", it's just something that
>>>>>>> challenges your boneheaded, idiotic outlook.  Grow a brain, and cope
>>>>>>> with the fact that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is about
>>>>>>> giving a foundation to independent public media, do you want the
>>>>>>> networks to control the airwaves entirely, you fucking dumbfuck?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PBS sucks... haven't tuned in for years.
>>>>>> They fundraise every three weeks, mostly shit programming... self help
>>>>>> gurus, cooking nonsense, travel scam shows, left wing news.
>>>>>> Some shows try to tempt one into buying the show available on DVD.
>>>>>> Seems to be mostly programs that need government funding, because the
>>>>>> viewers find nothing of value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only good shows they ever had on were Masterpiece, Nova(older ones).
>>>>>> I get that type of programming by subscribing to Britbox, Acorn TV.
>>>>>> 160 bucks a year, watch entire series when I want without a single
>>>>>> interruption.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If PBS were any good, I'd pay for it, but it's "garbage".
>>>>>> Stop sending taxpayer money to keep crap on air.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet another voice is heard from who could have gotten a full refund,
>>>>> but has squandered their opportunity by just whining instead. Shocking! /s
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>
>>>> When Trump stops the funding we are getting a "refund" of sorts because our
>>>> tax dollars will no longer be funding this lefty garbage.
>>>
>>> You'll get no such refund.
>> 
>> Refund in quotes.
>> 
>> 
>>>> And that's the point.
>>>> Not how much.
>>>
>>> Oh, I understand your alleged 'principle' on this, but if the amount of
>>> money was actually significant to you personally, you would have taken
>>> up the offer to be reimbursed.
>> 
>> Of course I would take the offer, however what's more important to me is
>> where my tax money is being spent.
>> 
>> 
>>> The real point is that there's invariably many things that a government
>>> or institution does which one may not 100.00% agree with, but to try to
>>> be petulant about that is very childish.
>> 
>> Promoting one side or the other when a government funded, no matter how small,
>> cause is supposed to be independent is wrong.
>> I don't want my tax dollars going to pay for promoting Sesame Street in some
>> middle eastern country either.
>> 
>>>
>>>> Not what programs are fairly balanced or lean one way or the other.
>>>> In this case, one bad apple spoils the bunch.
>>>
>>> If that were really true, you'd be calling for Trump to be hanged.
>> 
>> Nope.
>> Unlike you leftists, I don't tow the Trump line nor the republican line for
>> that matter.
>> I agree with some of what he is doing and disagree with others.
>> 
>> Leftists rarely admit that the other side is making progress nor do they admit when
>> their side is screwing things up.
>> The last 4 years of the left covering for Biden is proof positive of that.
>> Hell, Kamala was installed and coroneted and you guys just accepted it.
>> The media lied to you for 4+ years and you accepted it.
>> etc.
>> 
>> 
>>>> The smart people are leaving NPR because they realize it is biased left.
>>>> Like this senior NPR editor for example.
>>>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-accusing-outlet-liberal-bias-rcna148258>
>>>
>>> Gosh, you've found **one** malcontent - - and they resigned after they
>>> were suspended for violating their terms of employment.
>> 
>> Yea like not asking if he can expose NPR for what it really is without
>> asking for permission first.
>> and this guy was a senior editor.
>
> What matters is what his work contract says.  That's why they were able 
> to discipline him prior to him quitting.

Yea, but only enforced when the person exposes the scam going on.
In this case the far left lean of NPR.

Speaking of exposing, why is Jeffery Toobin still employed?
Why, because CNN doesn't give a hoot about him masturbating and getting
caught on camera during a Zoom call.

See how it works?


-- 
pothead
Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
Treat it accordingly
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914234

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs9s7r$2df8v$1@dont-email.me: 

> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/29/25 08:03, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-28, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/26/25 20:56, pothead wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> NPR?
>>>>> They have become a joke.
>>>>> I sure as hell don't want my tax dollars ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A common complaint from those in the right wing echo chamber.
>>>>
>>>> In all likelihood, they don't even know how much of their per
>>>> capita tax dollars go to fund the public broadcasting system.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, I'll even offer up a wager on this:  for the next 48 hours,
>>>> the first dozen who correctly posts what the per capita per year
>>>> contribution is to PBS, I'll personally reimburse them that amount.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> funding that bastion of progressive hate.
>>>>
>>>> Translation: consistently identified as being one of the most
>>>> trusted and least partisan news sources in America.
>>>>
>>>> "... in every year since 2004, surveys of Americans have shown PBS
>>>> to have been consistently ranked as the most trusted institution in
>>>> comparison to commercial broadcast and cable television,
>>>> newspapers, and streaming services, and in January 2021, Americans
>>>> valued tax dollars spent on PBS behind only military defense and
>>>> oversight of food and drug safety.[103]"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Let the Hollywood elite contribute to their propaganda.
>>>>
>>>> PBS ain't anything close to 'Hollywood'.
>>>>
>>>> Plus even if one goes to look at their ratings on AllSides, note
>>>> that until 2022, they were solidly "center" year after year, which
>>>> is more indicative of half of the country lurching further to the
>>>> right than them really changing.
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour>
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>> 
>>> It's the direction the supposedly PUBLIC network takes as a whole.
>>> Allsides Considered is an exception that you are cherry picking.
>>> 
>>> This is more inline with what I am concerned about:
>>> <https://www.thegatewaypundit.com
>>
>> Oh, let's check them at Allsides too:
>>
>><https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit>
>>
>> Gosh...Right Wing score of 4.0, with independent confirmation as well
>> as notations of third party notations of bias, falsehoods &
>> misinformation: 
> 
> Huh?
> I agree with you that All sides Now is an exception.
> It's fair.
> Most of NPR is not.
> 
> 
>>> ...2025/03/watch-rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-plays-sick-pbs/>
>>
>> Cute claim .. but instead of believing MTG's claims, let's actually
>> wait for perjury charges to actually be filed for lying to Congress.
> 
> The head of NPR Kathrine Maher was exposed as a liar to congress the
> other day. 


    The party of Jewish space lasers
and Haitians eating dogs cares about
lying?








 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914427

In article <XnsB2B1D8AC49EA0629555@185.151.15.190>, 
noemail@aol.com says...
> 
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:vs9s7r$2df8v$1@dont-email.me: 
> 
> > On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >> On 3/29/25 08:03, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2025-03-28, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 3/26/25 20:56, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NPR?
> >>>>> They have become a joke.
> >>>>> I sure as hell don't want my tax dollars ...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> A common complaint from those in the right wing echo chamber.
> >>>>
> >>>> In all likelihood, they don't even know how much of their per
> >>>> capita tax dollars go to fund the public broadcasting system.
> >>>>
> >>>> Indeed, I'll even offer up a wager on this:  for the next 48 hours,
> >>>> the first dozen who correctly posts what the per capita per year
> >>>> contribution is to PBS, I'll personally reimburse them that amount.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> funding that bastion of progressive hate.
> >>>>
> >>>> Translation: consistently identified as being one of the most
> >>>> trusted and least partisan news sources in America.
> >>>>
> >>>> "... in every year since 2004, surveys of Americans have shown PBS
> >>>> to have been consistently ranked as the most trusted institution in
> >>>> comparison to commercial broadcast and cable television,
> >>>> newspapers, and streaming services, and in January 2021, Americans
> >>>> valued tax dollars spent on PBS behind only military defense and
> >>>> oversight of food and drug safety.[103]"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Let the Hollywood elite contribute to their propaganda.
> >>>>
> >>>> PBS ain't anything close to 'Hollywood'.
> >>>>
> >>>> Plus even if one goes to look at their ratings on AllSides, note
> >>>> that until 2022, they were solidly "center" year after year, which
> >>>> is more indicative of half of the country lurching further to the
> >>>> right than them really changing.
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour>
> >>>>
> >>>> -hh
> >>> 
> >>> It's the direction the supposedly PUBLIC network takes as a whole.
> >>> Allsides Considered is an exception that you are cherry picking.
> >>> 
> >>> This is more inline with what I am concerned about:
> >>> <https://www.thegatewaypundit.com
> >>
> >> Oh, let's check them at Allsides too:
> >>
> >><https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit>
> >>
> >> Gosh...Right Wing score of 4.0, with independent confirmation as well
> >> as notations of third party notations of bias, falsehoods &
> >> misinformation: 
> > 
> > Huh?
> > I agree with you that All sides Now is an exception.
> > It's fair.
> > Most of NPR is not.
> > 
> > 
> >>> ...2025/03/watch-rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-plays-sick-pbs/>
> >>
> >> Cute claim .. but instead of believing MTG's claims, let's actually
> >> wait for perjury charges to actually be filed for lying to Congress.
> > 
> > The head of NPR Kathrine Maher was exposed as a liar to congress the
> > other day. 
> 
> 
>     The party of Jewish space lasers
> and Haitians eating dogs cares about
> lying?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  

and again he spins away from the facts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914523

On 3/29/25 18:29, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-03-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/29/25 08:03, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-28, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/26/25 20:56, pothead wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> NPR?
>>>>> They have become a joke.
>>>>> I sure as hell don't want my tax dollars ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A common complaint from those in the right wing echo chamber.
>>>>
>>>> In all likelihood, they don't even know how much of their per capita tax
>>>> dollars go to fund the public broadcasting system.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, I'll even offer up a wager on this:  for the next 48 hours, the
>>>> first dozen who correctly posts what the per capita per year
>>>> contribution is to PBS, I'll personally reimburse them that amount.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> funding that bastion of progressive hate.
>>>>
>>>> Translation: consistently identified as being one of the most trusted
>>>> and least partisan news sources in America.
>>>>
>>>> "... in every year since 2004, surveys of Americans have shown PBS to
>>>> have been consistently ranked as the most trusted institution in
>>>> comparison to commercial broadcast and cable television, newspapers, and
>>>> streaming services, and in January 2021, Americans valued tax dollars
>>>> spent on PBS behind only military defense and oversight of food and drug
>>>> safety.[103]"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Let the Hollywood elite contribute to their propaganda.
>>>>
>>>> PBS ain't anything close to 'Hollywood'.
>>>>
>>>> Plus even if one goes to look at their ratings on AllSides, note that
>>>> until 2022, they were solidly "center" year after year, which is more
>>>> indicative of half of the country lurching further to the right than
>>>> them really changing.
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.allsides.com/news-source/pbs-newshour>
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> It's the direction the supposedly PUBLIC network takes as a whole.
>>> Allsides Considered is an exception that you are cherry picking.
>>>
>>> This is more inline with what I am concerned about:
>>> <https://www.thegatewaypundit.com
>>
>> Oh, let's check them at Allsides too:
>>
>> <https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit>
>>
>> Gosh...Right Wing score of 4.0, with independent confirmation as well as
>> notations of third party notations of bias, falsehoods & misinformation:
> 
> Huh?
> I agree with you that All sides Now is an exception.
> It's fair.
> Most of NPR is not.

It is?  How?  Because 17th-18th century Classical Music is "woke"? 
Frankly, I don't see how that would even be possible, since that genre 
was almost exclusively written by European white guys.


>>> ...2025/03/watch-rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-plays-sick-pbs/>
>>
>> Cute claim .. but instead of believing MTG's claims, let's actually wait
>> for perjury charges to actually be filed for lying to Congress.
> 
> The head of NPR Kathrine Maher was exposed as a liar to congress the other day.
> They used her own tweets.

But if true, then why haven't perjury charges being filed against Maher?


>>> I don't want a penny of my tax dollars paying for that kind of garbage.
>>
>> Do you even know how many pennies of your tax dollars pay for PBS?
> 
> If it's even a single 1/100000th of a cent it's too much.
> I want zero of my tax dollars going to that garbage.

Too bad you couldn't have articulated

>>> If NPR wants to do what they do, that's fine but get private funding either
>>> through fundraising or go quasi commercial.
>>
>> Its already 95+% privately funded, which means that its more independent
>> of Government subsidies than Elon Musk.
> 
> It gets approximately $535 Million dollars per year from federal funding but
> that number is difficult to pin down because of the way the funds are distributed
> and what parts of the federal government is responsible for what.

Too bad you couldn't have articulated how much it was, so as to have 
gotten it refunded by me, as per my prior offer.
   >> Plus much of the beneficiaries are under-supported rural that 
commercial
>> enterprise isn't interested in because they're unprofitable markets.
> 
>> -hh
> 
> If NPR was truly non partisan I would not have a problem with it.
> I used to enjoy Car Talk with "Click and Clack" the tappet brothers.
> However that show ended on NPR.

It ended because Tom died.

But now try to name specific NPR national broadcast shows that you want 
to claim is so highly offensively partisan to you, and with receipts 
from independent sources that agree, provide detail why.


> Even Bill Maher called NPR "crazy far left" the other night and he is hardly
> a right winger.

Bill Maher's merely an entertainer, just like Fox News, who is willing 
to be less than truthful in order to get good ratings.  Try an actually 
independent source who's got objective data to back them up, not 
soundbytes.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2914633

On 30/3/25 8:27, -hh wrote:
>> Even Bill Maher called NPR "crazy far left" the other night and
>> he is hardly
>> a right winger.
>
> Bill Maher's merely an entertainer, just like Fox News, who is
> willing to be less than truthful in order to get good ratings.
> Try an actually independent source who's got objective data to
> back them up, not soundbytes.

bill bill's dedication to liberal feminist causes helped him 
conquer the Avocado Jungle in central California.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094834/

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2912966 — Re: NPR Admits – No

On 3/26/2025 5:41 PM, John Smyth wrote:
> [bullshit snipped]

NPR did not "admit" anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2912971 — Re: NPR Admits ? No

In article <vs2ap4$2vp78$1@dont-email.me>, 
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
> 
> On 3/26/2025 5:41 PM, John Smyth wrote:
> > [bullshit snipped]
> 
> NPR did not "admit" anything.

They are toast.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2912980 — Re: NPR Admits ? No

On 3/26/2025 6:51 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted 
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch 
of lies:

> In article <vs2ap4$2vp78$1@dont-email.me>,
> j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 3/26/2025 5:41 PM, John Smyth wrote:
>>> [bullshit snipped]
>>
>> NPR did not "admit" anything.
> 
> They are 

part of The Gold Standard.

Yes.

-- 
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, 
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2912994 — Re: NPR Admits ? No

Michael A Terrell wrote:

> On 3/26/2025 6:51 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
> another content-free batch of lies:
> 
> > In article <vs2ap4$2vp78$1@dont-email.me>,
> > j_carlson@gmx.com says...
> > > 
> > > On 3/26/2025 5:41 PM, John Smyth wrote:
> > > > [bullshit snipped]
> > > 
> > > NPR did not "admit" anything.
> > 
> > They are 
> 
> part of The Gold Standard.
> 
> Yes.


Dick sucking. That's my gold standard. I suck dick because I'm queer.
You should know that by now, Michael.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2913108 — Re: NPR Admits ? No

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> Michael A Terrell wrote:
> 
>> On 3/26/2025 6:51 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
>> another content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <vs2ap4$2vp78$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 3/26/2025 5:41 PM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>> [bullshit snipped]
>>>>
>>>> NPR did not "admit" anything.
>>>
>>> They are
>>
>> part of The Gold Standard.
>>
>> Yes.
> 
> 
> Dick sucking. That's my gold standard. I suck dick because I'm queer.
> You should know that by now, Michael.
> 
I don't know anything about your private life.  You say you were drunk 
at the time?
-- 
You're the future of fire
You're the witness of war
You're the irony of justice
And the father of law
Been waiting for awhile to meet you
For the chance to shake your hand
To give you thanks for all the sufferin' you command

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

csiph-web