Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #183102

Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk

From Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk
Date 2025-03-31 10:08 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vsdm2g$3sqnd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <dm0jujtnmj2itcjnkl0poc1lgiqjr7pk5t@4ax.com> <vsch5p$2jaka$1@dont-email.me> <vsdg94$3mom4$1@dont-email.me> <m4v1oaFc31U1@mid.individual.net> <vsdkp1$3rco0$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Paul wrote:
> On Mon, 3/31/2025 4:23 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
>> Graham J wrote:
>>
>>> Here in the UK PSTN was supposed to be shut down by the end of 2025.  I think it's been postponed.
>>
>> Now reprieved until end Jan 2027
> 
> Let's hope the engineering of this change is first rate.
> 
> Is the replacement scheme, organized in any way ???
> Who is in charge ?

In the UK the telephone service is a nationalised entity called BT Group 
PLC (was British Telecom) which owns Openreach, which in turn owns the 
infrastructure, see:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openreach>

Openreach sells the use of its copper pairs to ISPs (of which BT is one) 
to carry broadband services.  These copper pairs run from the customer 
premises to the exchange (or an intermediate cabinet for FTTC).  The 
PSTN is analog over these lines, and is digital thereafter.  The 
analog/copper part is old, unreliable, and high maintenance.  It is 
completely unsuited to supporting a broadband service.  So Openreach 
want rid of it.  Openreach makes some money from carrying phone calls, 
and some from carrying broadband services.  The phone service is seen as 
a Universal Service Obligation but there is no such requirement for 
broadband.

Openreach and other entities are installing fibre.  There appears to be 
no co-ordination or organisation in this: where a competing supplier 
installs fibre Openreach rushes to catch up.  Some areas are well 
served, others not at all.

NOBODY is in charge!


-- 
Graham J

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

MS Shadow Copy service    thread has replies from me. === Windhowk  micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-29 01:32 -0400
  Re: MS Shadow Copy service    thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Michael Logies <logies@t-online.de> - 2025-03-29 13:50 +0100
    Re: MS Shadow Copy service    thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-29 16:09 -0400
  Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-29 09:07 -0400
    Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-29 16:08 -0400
      Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-29 19:38 -0400
        Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-29 21:42 -0400
          Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-29 22:57 -0400
            Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-30 09:20 -0400
              Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-30 10:39 -0400
          Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-30 02:08 -0400
            Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-30 07:43 -0400
              Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-30 10:11 -0400
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-30 13:18 -0400
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-30 13:44 -0400
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-30 18:38 -0400
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2025-03-31 08:29 +0100
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-03-31 08:23 +0000
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-31 04:46 -0400
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2025-03-31 10:08 +0100
                Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-31 21:15 +1100
            Re: MS Shadow Copy service thread has replies from me. === Windhowk micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-30 09:28 -0400
  Re: MS Shadow Copy service    thread has replies from me. === Windhowk  micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-29 11:10 -0400

csiph-web