Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.microsoft.windows > #1181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-02-20 16:33 +0000 |
| Last post | 2022-02-22 10:30 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.microsoft.windows
If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-20 16:33 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2022-02-20 16:38 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-20 16:58 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-20 12:09 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-20 13:05 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-20 20:37 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-20 21:38 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 04:16 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 04:38 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 08:05 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-21 08:38 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 08:55 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2022-02-21 09:27 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-21 11:32 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 13:25 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 15:16 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 02:30 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:29 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-28 05:44 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 15:14 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-21 21:16 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-22 05:27 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:09 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 12:43 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 13:37 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 15:01 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-22 16:44 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 19:36 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-22 21:14 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-23 07:58 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-23 09:01 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-23 09:27 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> - 2022-02-23 03:26 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 02:30 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:22 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 12:43 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 15:11 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-21 15:23 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-22 05:32 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2022-02-22 09:37 -0600
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 11:12 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-21 21:14 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-22 05:44 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:15 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 12:43 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 13:39 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 15:01 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-22 16:31 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 19:36 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-22 21:05 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-23 07:58 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-23 08:53 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-21 08:38 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 15:20 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-21 21:17 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-22 05:56 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:18 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 02:30 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:25 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 12:43 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 13:53 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-22 15:01 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-22 16:31 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-13 19:47 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-13 15:08 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-13 22:25 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-13 18:07 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 04:32 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 06:41 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 14:50 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 10:25 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 16:08 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:45 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Sail Fisherman <sailfisherman@sailfisherman.com> - 2022-08-15 02:07 +0900
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-14 10:30 -0600
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:39 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Rick" <rick@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 10:26 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 11:04 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 16:28 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Silvano <Silvano@noncisonopernessuno.it> - 2022-08-14 17:31 +0200
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 11:47 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 17:22 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-14 13:01 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 18:26 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? CDB <bellemarecd@gmail.com> - 2022-08-14 13:31 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Arlen Holder <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 22:15 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2022-08-15 15:07 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:09 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 17:14 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2022-08-16 18:59 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2022-08-16 18:57 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-15 11:14 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:18 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:34 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? YK <youkidding@yahoo.com> - 2022-08-16 17:04 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 16:19 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Arlen Holder <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 22:16 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Rick" <rick@nospam.com> - 2022-08-17 11:41 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-08-14 17:49 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> - 2022-08-14 10:31 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-08-14 12:05 -0400
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2022-08-14 11:09 -0600
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2022-02-21 09:23 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 11:12 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-21 11:32 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 15:26 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-21 21:19 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-20 20:54 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-20 16:06 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-21 00:28 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-20 21:57 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 04:46 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 08:08 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-21 07:41 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 08:34 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> - 2022-02-22 05:18 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-22 07:37 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-22 08:32 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 09:43 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2022-02-23 09:53 +1300
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> - 2022-02-23 17:10 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2022-02-24 05:39 +1100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-26 11:19 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> - 2022-02-26 16:34 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-26 11:45 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-27 16:03 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Jacob Jones" <jkj33@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 07:10 +1100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-26 16:09 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2022-02-27 10:25 +1300
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-27 10:22 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-28 15:28 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2022-02-23 09:04 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> - 2022-02-23 03:24 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> - 2022-02-23 17:05 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2022-02-24 05:34 +1100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-23 19:25 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> - 2022-02-23 16:06 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? allen <allen@spam.com> - 2022-02-23 15:22 -0800
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2022-02-24 10:42 +1300
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> - 2022-02-23 16:59 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> - 2022-02-23 12:13 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> - 2022-02-23 17:39 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-23 21:58 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-24 07:19 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-24 01:33 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-24 17:04 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2022-02-24 12:40 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-21 07:46 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-20 21:47 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-02-21 07:43 +0100
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 21:39 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 04:19 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-20 13:01 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-20 20:44 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-20 21:42 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 04:54 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-21 08:09 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-21 21:34 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@r04.ch> - 2022-02-21 21:27 -0500
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2022-02-22 08:02 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-02-22 08:42 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2022-02-22 09:14 +0000
Re: If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too? rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> - 2022-02-22 10:30 -0500
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-22 08:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sv272g$10s8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1289 |
Joerg Lorenz wrote: > You are a very simple Troll. You do not understand the concept of > IP-addresses. > > Everybody should use the TOR-network or VPN. This is what happens when you use a TOR network or VPN with Apple iCloud. <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct! If Apple can lock you out of your own devices on a mere whim, why can't Microsoft (now that Microsoft is forcing Apple-like logins on Windows 11)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rabidR04CH <rabid@ro4.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-22 09:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9E6RJ.9870$WZCa.4933@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #1284 |
On 2022-02-22 00:18, Peter wrote: > Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote: > >>> No, it raises suspicions just about anywhere. People don't see it as a >>> person merely trying to protect his IP address from attackers; they >>> assume that it's a thief pretending to be a specific user in order to >>> steal their identity. They're right to do so, either way, as it helps to >>> prevents serious financial damage. >> >> That is a claim by the western governments. The IP-address is not >> relevant to prove the right to access certain accounts or data. > > If people are changing their IP address to hide from Microsoft or Apple then > they /deserve/ to have their computers shut down by Microsoft and Apple. > > Why are they hiding? > It's almost always to do bad things. > > Microsoft & Apple would be right to disable their operating systems on them. That's fairly extreme. -- rabidR04CH MSI GT72 2QD on Linux Mint 20.3 "But Peter and the apostles answered, 'We must obey God rather than men.'" - Acts 5:29 For fans of message boards, I invite you: https://retalk.com/invite/rabidR04CH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 09:53 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <sv3ih2$1n91$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1298 |
On 2022-02-22 14:43:16 +0000, rabidR04CH said: > On 2022-02-22 00:18, Peter wrote: >> Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, it raises suspicions just about anywhere. People don't see it as a >>>> person merely trying to protect his IP address from attackers; they >>>> assume that it's a thief pretending to be a specific user in order to >>>> steal their identity. They're right to do so, either way, as it helps to >>>> prevents serious financial damage. >>> >>> That is a claim by the western governments. The IP-address is not >>> relevant to prove the right to access certain accounts or data. >> >> If people are changing their IP address to hide from Microsoft or Apple then >> they /deserve/ to have their computers shut down by Microsoft and Apple. >> >> Why are they hiding? >> It's almost always to do bad things. >> >> Microsoft & Apple would be right to disable their operating systems on them. > > That's fairly extreme. Very few people have a static IP address, so using that as any kind of authenticity test is simply idiotic. IP address are handed out by your ISP as needed and you often have to pay extra to have a static IP address. My own home-4G connection can have an IP address of almost anywhere in the country depending on which Vodafone server it connects to and certainly not actually where I live.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 17:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sv5pqs$540$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1332 |
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>>>> No, it raises suspicions just about anywhere. People don't see it as a >>>>> person merely trying to protect his IP address from attackers; they >>>>> assume that it's a thief pretending to be a specific user in order to >>>>> steal their identity. They're right to do so, either way, as it helps to >>>>> prevents serious financial damage. >>>> >>>> That is a claim by the western governments. The IP-address is not >>>> relevant to prove the right to access certain accounts or data. >>> >>> If people are changing their IP address to hide from Microsoft or Apple then >>> they /deserve/ to have their computers shut down by Microsoft and Apple. >>> >>> Why are they hiding? >>> It's almost always to do bad things. >>> >>> Microsoft & Apple would be right to disable their operating systems on them. >> >> That's fairly extreme. > > Very few people have a static IP address, so using that as any kind of > authenticity test is simply idiotic. IP address are handed out by your > ISP as needed and you often have to pay extra to have a static IP > address. My own home-4G connection can have an IP address of almost > anywhere in the country depending on which Vodafone server it connects > to and certainly not actually where I live. Apple has the right to protect its developers and the country from criminal actions by blocking their use of Apple devices just a the police put boots on criminal's cars that violate parking laws. You have to ask why are these criminals hiding their identity from Apple. Apple has the right to protect its devices by disabling them if Apple suspects you're trying to hide your identity from them. Why can't you just bring the device to Apple and show your government ID? What are you hiding from?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 05:39 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.1h13fazpbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #1351 |
Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote >>>>>> No, it raises suspicions just about anywhere. People don't see it >>>>>> as a >>>>>> person merely trying to protect his IP address from attackers; they >>>>>> assume that it's a thief pretending to be a specific user in order >>>>>> to >>>>>> steal their identity. They're right to do so, either way, as it >>>>>> helps to >>>>>> prevents serious financial damage. >>>>> >>>>> That is a claim by the western governments. The IP-address is not >>>>> relevant to prove the right to access certain accounts or data. >>>> >>>> If people are changing their IP address to hide from Microsoft or >>>> Apple then >>>> they /deserve/ to have their computers shut down by Microsoft and >>>> Apple. >>>> >>>> Why are they hiding? >>>> It's almost always to do bad things. >>>> >>>> Microsoft & Apple would be right to disable their operating systems >>>> on them. >>> >>> That's fairly extreme. >> >> Very few people have a static IP address, so using that as any kind of >> authenticity test is simply idiotic. IP address are handed out by your >> ISP as needed and you often have to pay extra to have a static IP >> address. My own home-4G connection can have an IP address of almost >> anywhere in the country depending on which Vodafone server it connects >> to and certainly not actually where I live. > > Apple has the right to protect its developers and the country from > criminal > actions by blocking their use of Apple devices just a the police put > boots > on criminal's cars that violate parking laws. > > You have to ask why are these criminals You havent established that they are criminals. > hiding their identity from Apple. Because what they do is none of Apple's business. > Apple has the right to protect its devices Its devices arent at any risk from those who choose not to tell Apple who they are. > by disabling them if Apple > suspects you're trying to hide your identity from them. > Why can't you just bring the device to Apple Because Apple is 300 miles away and given covid I am fucked if I am going to risk my life going there. > and show your government ID? There is no government ID in my country. > What are you hiding from? Not hiding from anything, just ensuring that Apple can not snoop on me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-26 11:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <svcurl$pt0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1351 |
Am 23.02.22 um 18:10 schrieb Peter: > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >> Very few people have a static IP address, so using that as any kind of >> authenticity test is simply idiotic. IP address are handed out by your >> ISP as needed and you often have to pay extra to have a static IP >> address. My own home-4G connection can have an IP address of almost >> anywhere in the country depending on which Vodafone server it connects >> to and certainly not actually where I live. > > Apple has the right to protect its developers and the country from criminal > actions by blocking their use of Apple devices just a the police put boots > on criminal's cars that violate parking laws. Apple nor any other company has the legitimation to enforce anything on other people's property. If they try it is a criminal offense. -- De gustibus non est disputandum
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-26 16:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <svdkqe$kuu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1365 |
Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote: > Apple nor any other company has the legitimation to enforce anything on > other people's property. > > If they try it is a criminal offense. If it were criminal to force a login into the iCloud, they'd be sued. And if it were criminal to disable an iOS device for using VPN, they'd be sued. It's not criminal. Apple can and does disable your device for any reason Apple chooses.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-26 11:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260220221145562133%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #1366 |
In article <svdkqe$kuu$1@dont-email.me>, Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote: > Apple can and does disable your device for any reason Apple chooses. no they very definitely do not, nor can they.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-27 16:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <svg7dd$1bmi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1367 |
nospam wrote: >> Apple can and does disable your device for any reason Apple chooses. > > no they very definitely do not, nor can they. Adults will notice iKooks brazenly deny all that they _hate_ about Apple. <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Even facts Apple itself doesn't deny (Apple does it all day, every day). <https://i.postimg.cc/8zSvshQf/appleid04.jpg> One has to ask _why_ iKooks don't know _anything_ about their beloved Apple? a. All iKooks are uneducated (none have a college degree - not even one!) b. All iKooks are of low IQ (you can tell by their lack of comprehension) c. And yet, iKooks are incredibly confident in their almost total ignorance. The fact is that Apple can and does unilaterally disable your iOS device. <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> The iKooks brazenly outright deny all facts that they _hate_ about Apple. They're like a fifth-grade ignorant bully told Santa Claus isn't real. -- My point isn't that iKooks are undeducated or that they're of low IQ, but _because_ they're those things, they own strong imaginary belief systems.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jacob Jones" <jkj33@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-27 07:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.1h7rnutqdsjozi@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #1366 |
On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 03:34:16 +1100, Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote: > Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote: > >> Apple nor any other company has the legitimation to enforce anything on >> other people's property. >> >> If they try it is a criminal offense. > > If it were criminal to force a login into the iCloud, they'd be sued. You aren't foced to login to the iCloud. > And if it were criminal to disable an iOS device for using VPN, Apple doesn't do that. > they'd be > sued. > > It's not criminal. > Apple can and does disable your device for any reason Apple chooses. In fact they only disable your device if it appears to be or has been claimed to be,, stolen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-26 16:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260220221609114019%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #1368 |
In article <op.1h7rnutqdsjozi@pvr2.lan>, Jacob Jones <jkj33@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apple can and does disable your device for any reason Apple chooses. > > In fact they only disable your device if it appears to be or has been > claimed to be,, stolen. not even then. the person who owns the phone can put their own phone into lost mode if it's lost or stolen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-27 10:25 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <sve5rg$h99$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1368 |
On 2022-02-26 20:10:32 +0000, Jacob Jones said: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 03:34:16 +1100, Peter > <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote: >> Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote: >> >>> Apple nor any other company has the legitimation to enforce anything on >>> other people's property. >>> >>> If they try it is a criminal offense. >> >> If it were criminal to force a login into the iCloud, they'd be sued. > > You aren't foced to login to the iCloud. Yep. We don't use iCloud for anything. Apart from the iPad nagging to use it (which we just ignore since it's only a "1" appearing on the Sytem preferences icon), it's completely irrelevant unless you choose to use it. >> And if it were criminal to disable an iOS device for using VPN, > > Apple doesn't do that. > >> they'd be >> sued. >> >> It's not criminal. >> Apple can and does disable your device for any reason Apple chooses. > > In fact they only disable your device if it appears to be or has been > claimed to be,, stolen. Apple doesn't disable anything. You, the owner, choose to disable a lost or stolen device via the Find My feature. Even then, it won't actually be disabled until it connects to the internet again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-27 10:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <svfjdp$2c2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1370 |
Your Name wrote: >> You aren't foced to login to the iCloud. > > Yep. We don't use iCloud for anything. Apart from the iPad nagging to > use it (which we just ignore since it's only a "1" appearing on the > Sytem preferences icon), it's completely irrelevant unless you choose > to use it. The iKooks are so uneducated they don't even realize you can't download any apps off the Apple App Store _without_ logging into Apple's iCloud. You just can't (unless you jailbreak, or get the app for only two days). The _adults_ on this ng will notice: It's always the same with iKooks: a. They're all uneducated, of low IQ and of abysmal low self esteem b. Apple is brilliant at feeding them exactly what they want to hear c. Hence, they simply deny all facts about Apple products they don't like -- My point isn't that iKooks are uneducated & of low IQ & low self esteem, but _because_ of those things, they always deny all facts they hate about Apple.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-28 15:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <svipnk$49o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1368 |
Jacob Jones wrote: >> If it were criminal to force a login into the iCloud, they'd be sued. > > You aren't foced to login to the iCloud. This post is for adults as it contains adult content. The iKook nospam is wrong again. 1. The iKooks only do exactly what Apple tells them to do 2. So the iKooks have no idea what Apple does when you don't 3. I _know_ what Apple does because I _tested_ what Apple will do On two separate iPads, what Apple did was consistent. A. If you don't log in to the iCloud, Apple will _force_ you to log into it. B. If you _still_ don't log into the iCloud, Apple will lock you out. C. If you try to unlock using VPN, Apple will disable the device. Adults will notice I provided proof and I described the sequence. Adults will notice the iKooks like nospam provide nothing but denials. The fact is that Apple locks you out of your own device if you break out of the walled garden. There is no question of that fact (as I already proved). The question is whether or not Microsoft will do the same. -- I don't care that iKooks are uneducated & of low IQ & low self esteem, but _because_ of those things, they are ignorant of what Apple actually does.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 09:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sv5etc$qos$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1284 |
"Peter" <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote | If people are changing their IP address to hide from Microsoft or Apple then | they /deserve/ to have their computers shut down by Microsoft and Apple. | | Why are they hiding? | It's almost always to do bad things. | Where do you get that? They could be hiding from their own dictatorial government. Or it might be me just using a different computer in a different location. Or they might be using a VPN for better privacy protection from the likes of Apple and Microsoft. Or maybe they're Ukrainian resistance fighters. Not everyone lives in the USA, in their parents' basement... Simply put, it's none of their damn business who you are or where you're logging in from. There's a famous video from Eric Schmidt using your logic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6e7wfDHzew He says that if you have something to hide you probably shouldn't be doing it. Schmidt not only leaves out much of the world living under oppression, as well as abused women and anyone planning a surprise party or simply wanting privacy. He also leaves out himself. I read that he got a NYC condo with no doorman so that reporters wouldn't be informed of his promiscuous lifestyle. | Microsoft & Apple would be right to disable their operating systems on them. I think the question here is about authority. If I want a tech company to block me with 2FA and matching IP, they can provide that service. When they start imposing it as a restriction that's way out of line. There should just be a box for people like you to check that says, "Yes, pllease be my mother because I can't manage my own life."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 03:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ddtRJ.47680$yi_7.8047@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #1345 |
On 2022-02-23 9:04 a.m., Mayayana wrote: > "Peter" <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote > > | If people are changing their IP address to hide from Microsoft or Apple > then > | they /deserve/ to have their computers shut down by Microsoft and Apple. > | > | Why are they hiding? > | It's almost always to do bad things. > | > > Where do you get that? They could be hiding from their > own dictatorial government. Or it might be me just using > a different computer in a different location. Or they might > be using a VPN for better privacy protection from the > likes of Apple and Microsoft. Or maybe they're Ukrainian > resistance fighters. Not everyone lives in the USA, in > their parents' basement... Simply put, it's none of their > damn business who you are or where you're logging in from. > > There's a famous video from Eric Schmidt using your logic: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6e7wfDHzew > > He says that if you have something to hide you probably > shouldn't be doing it. Schmidt not only leaves out much > of the world living under oppression, as well as abused > women and anyone planning a surprise party or simply wanting > privacy. He also leaves out himself. I read that he got a NYC > condo with no doorman so that reporters wouldn't be informed > of his promiscuous lifestyle. I like the way you think and agree. Users of an operating should have the right to use it from wherever, whenever and feel free to connect to a VPN which, at the very least, encrypts the data so that the ISP itself cannot monitor them to the advantage of an oppressive government. > | Microsoft & Apple would be right to disable their operating systems on > them. > > I think the question here is about authority. If I want > a tech company to block me with 2FA and matching IP, > they can provide that service. When they start imposing > it as a restriction that's way out of line. There should > just be a box for people like you to check that says, "Yes, > pllease be my mother because I can't manage my own life." It's called voting for leftist political parties. -- rabidR04CH "But Peter and the apostles answered, 'We must obey God rather than men.'" - Acts 5:29 For fans of message boards, I invite you: https://retalk.com/invite/rabidR04CH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sv5pg7$tgd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1347 |
rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> wrote: > Users of an operating should have > the right to use it from wherever, whenever and feel free to connect to > a VPN which, at the very least, encrypts the data so that the ISP itself > cannot monitor them to the advantage of an oppressive government. Apple disabled their device because Apple suspected criminal activity. If they walk into any convenient Apple store and prove they aren't using their now disabled Apple devices for criminal activity, and if they show their government issued identification to Apple employees to check on them, then Apple should remove the disabling lock on their Apple device. It's no different than when you park your car illegally and the government puts a boot on the wheels so that you can't use it until you pay the fine. You should be thanking Apple for preventing suspected criminal actions by disabling the device so that it can no longer be used without proving your government identification in person at the nearest Apple store.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-24 05:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.1h127ozsbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #1350 |
Peter <occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk> wrote > rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> wrote >> Users of an operating should have >> the right to use it from wherever, whenever and feel free to connect to >> a VPN which, at the very least, encrypts the data so that the ISP itself >> cannot monitor them to the advantage of an oppressive government. > > Apple disabled their device because Apple suspected criminal activity. > > If they walk into any convenient Apple store and prove they aren't using > their now disabled Apple devices for criminal activity, and if they show > their government issued identification to Apple employees to check on > them, then Apple should remove the disabling lock on their Apple device. > It's no different than when you park your car illegally and the > government puts a boot on the wheels so that you can't useit until you > pay the fine. Very different, Apple isnt the govt and even with an illegally parked car, you only have to pay the fine, not prove who you are. > You should be thanking Apple for preventing suspected criminal actions by > disabling the device so that it can no longer be used without proving > your government identification in person at the nearest Apple store. Mine is 300 miles away and we don't have any govt ID,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 19:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sv5u78$vld$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1347 |
Am 23.02.22 um 09:24 schrieb rabidR04CH: > On 2022-02-23 9:04 a.m., Mayayana wrote: >> I think the question here is about authority. If I want >> a tech company to block me with 2FA and matching IP, >> they can provide that service. When they start imposing >> it as a restriction that's way out of line. There should >> just be a box for people like you to check that says, "Yes, >> pllease be my mother because I can't manage my own life." > > It's called voting for leftist political parties. You are simply a braindead Troll and Trumpist. -- De gustibus non est disputandum
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rabidR04CH <rabid@R04.CH> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-23 16:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <JlxRJ.47687$yi_7.11697@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #1354 |
On 2022-02-23 1:25 p.m., Joerg Lorenz wrote: > Am 23.02.22 um 09:24 schrieb rabidR04CH: >> On 2022-02-23 9:04 a.m., Mayayana wrote: >>> I think the question here is about authority. If I want >>> a tech company to block me with 2FA and matching IP, >>> they can provide that service. When they start imposing >>> it as a restriction that's way out of line. There should >>> just be a box for people like you to check that says, "Yes, >>> pllease be my mother because I can't manage my own life." >> >> It's called voting for leftist political parties. > > You are simply a braindead Troll and Trumpist. And _your_ posts are worthless to me. You are hereby filtered. -- rabidR04CH "But Peter and the apostles answered, 'We must obey God rather than men.'" - Acts 5:29 For fans of message boards, I invite you: https://retalk.com/invite/rabidR04CH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.microsoft.windows
csiph-web