Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #632796 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-07-05 04:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-07-09 00:22 -0500 |
| Articles | 17 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: PING: Ivo Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-05 04:05 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 13:04 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 12:26 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 13:34 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 12:36 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 15:04 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 14:17 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 15:45 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 14:56 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 16:51 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 15:57 -0700
Re: π³οΈβπPING: Ivoπ³οΈβπ πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπJenπππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ Dershmender ππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπΆη¬πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2024-07-06 14:03 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-09 00:42 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-08 17:53 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-08 19:20 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-09 00:27 -0500
Re: PING: Ivo Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-09 00:22 -0500
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 04:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PING: Ivo |
| Message-ID | <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me> |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>>Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > >>>In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>much spam. > >>I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > > Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > paranoic tendancies. ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be apropos here. > There is only one correct response: And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". <snicker> FU set appropriately. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 13:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <668843d2$1$3068692$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #632796 |
In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > > > Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: > >>On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > > > >>>Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? > >>>The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action > >>>to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage > >>>drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > > > >>>In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first > >>>connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents > >>>much spam. > > > >>I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network > >>problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to > >>investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > > > > Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > > paranoic tendancies. > > ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is > an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be > apropos here. > > > There is only one correct response: > > And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by > Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > > <snicker> > > FU set appropriately. So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #632809 |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >> >>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>> >>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? >>> >>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>>> much spam. >>> >>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. >>> >>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>> paranoic tendancies. >> >> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is >> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be >> apropos here. >> >>> There is only one correct response: >> >> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >> >> <snicker> >> >> FU set appropriately. > > So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? > it was like he rehearsed for days
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 13:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <66884ac4$2$1895506$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #632811 |
In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says... > > Skeeter wrote: > > In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > >> > >>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: > >>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? > >>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action > >>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage > >>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > >>> > >>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first > >>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents > >>>>> much spam. > >>> > >>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network > >>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to > >>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > >>> > >>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > >>> paranoic tendancies. > >> > >> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is > >> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be > >> apropos here. > >> > >>> There is only one correct response: > >> > >> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by > >> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > >> > >> <snicker> > >> > >> FU set appropriately. > > > > So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? > > > it was like he rehearsed for days oh he did and he had plenty of tutors
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 12:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #632812 |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 > @gmail.com says... >> >> Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? >>>>> >>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>>>>> much spam. >>>>> >>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. >>>>> >>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>>> paranoic tendancies. >>>> >>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is >>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be >>>> apropos here. >>>> >>>>> There is only one correct response: >>>> >>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> FU set appropriately. >>> >>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? >>> >> it was like he rehearsed for days > > oh he did and he had plenty of tutors > good thing they used those things to read from
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 15:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <66885fe5$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #632813 |
In article <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says... > > Skeeter wrote: > > In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 > > @gmail.com says... > >> > >> Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: > >>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? > >>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action > >>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage > >>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > >>>>> > >>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first > >>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents > >>>>>>> much spam. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network > >>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to > >>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > >>>>> paranoic tendancies. > >>>> > >>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is > >>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be > >>>> apropos here. > >>>> > >>>>> There is only one correct response: > >>>> > >>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by > >>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > >>>> > >>>> <snicker> > >>>> > >>>> FU set appropriately. > >>> > >>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? > >>> > >> it was like he rehearsed for days > > > > oh he did and he had plenty of tutors > > > good thing they used those things to read from he also had an ear piece that was obvious
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 14:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1z-dnTrymehv_xX7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #632815 |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 > @gmail.com says... >> >> Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 >>> @gmail.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>>>>>>> much spam. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>>>>> paranoic tendancies. >>>>>> >>>>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is >>>>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be >>>>>> apropos here. >>>>>> >>>>>>> There is only one correct response: >>>>>> >>>>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>>>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>> >>>>>> FU set appropriately. >>>>> >>>>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? >>>>> >>>> it was like he rehearsed for days >>> >>> oh he did and he had plenty of tutors >>> >> good thing they used those things to read from > > he also had an ear piece that was obvious > i don't think he likes audiences
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 15:45 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <66886983$0$212413$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #632817 |
In article <1z-dnTrymehv_xX7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says... > > Skeeter wrote: > > In article <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 > > @gmail.com says... > >> > >> Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 > >>> @gmail.com says... > >>>> > >>>> Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? > >>>>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action > >>>>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage > >>>>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first > >>>>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents > >>>>>>>>> much spam. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network > >>>>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to > >>>>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > >>>>>>> paranoic tendancies. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is > >>>>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be > >>>>>> apropos here. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> There is only one correct response: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by > >>>>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <snicker> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> FU set appropriately. > >>>>> > >>>>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? > >>>>> > >>>> it was like he rehearsed for days > >>> > >>> oh he did and he had plenty of tutors > >>> > >> good thing they used those things to read from > > > > he also had an ear piece that was obvious > > > i don't think he likes audiences well he did have a cold
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 14:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <NqicnaMlXpyI8RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #632824 |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <1z-dnTrymehv_xX7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 > @gmail.com says... >> >> Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 >>> @gmail.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 >>>>> @gmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>>>>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>>>>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>>>>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>>>>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>>>>>>>>> much spam. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>>>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>>>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>>>>>>> paranoic tendancies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is >>>>>>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be >>>>>>>> apropos here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is only one correct response: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>>>>>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FU set appropriately. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? >>>>>>> >>>>>> it was like he rehearsed for days >>>>> >>>>> oh he did and he had plenty of tutors >>>>> >>>> good thing they used those things to read from >>> >>> he also had an ear piece that was obvious >>> >> i don't think he likes audiences > > well he did have a cold > a common thing to get ... in june
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 16:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <668878e3$1$2363148$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #632830 |
In article <NqicnaMlXpyI8RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says... > > Skeeter wrote: > > In article <1z-dnTrymehv_xX7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 > > @gmail.com says... > >> > >> Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 > >>> @gmail.com says... > >>>> > >>>> Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 > >>>>> @gmail.com says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? > >>>>>>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action > >>>>>>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage > >>>>>>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first > >>>>>>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents > >>>>>>>>>>> much spam. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network > >>>>>>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to > >>>>>>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > >>>>>>>>> paranoic tendancies. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is > >>>>>>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be > >>>>>>>> apropos here. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> There is only one correct response: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by > >>>>>>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> <snicker> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> FU set appropriately. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> it was like he rehearsed for days > >>>>> > >>>>> oh he did and he had plenty of tutors > >>>>> > >>>> good thing they used those things to read from > >>> > >>> he also had an ear piece that was obvious > >>> > >> i don't think he likes audiences > > > > well he did have a cold > > > a common thing to get ... in june oh that explains it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-05 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qi-dnVNagdyj5xX7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #632833 |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <NqicnaMlXpyI8RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 > @gmail.com says... >> >> Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <1z-dnTrymehv_xX7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 >>> @gmail.com says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <iXSdnWpUDoq_1hX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 >>>>> @gmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <iXSdnWlUDopH1RX7nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100 >>>>>>> @gmail.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>>>>>>>>>>> The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>>>>>>>>>>> drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>>>>>>>>>>> connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>>>>>>>>>>> much spam. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>>>>>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>>>>>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>>>>>>>>> paranoic tendancies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is >>>>>>>>>> an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be >>>>>>>>>> apropos here. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is only one correct response: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>>>>>>>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FU set appropriately. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So what did you think of the great job Joe did at the debate? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it was like he rehearsed for days >>>>>>> >>>>>>> oh he did and he had plenty of tutors >>>>>>> >>>>>> good thing they used those things to read from >>>>> >>>>> he also had an ear piece that was obvious >>>>> >>>> i don't think he likes audiences >>> >>> well he did have a cold >>> >> a common thing to get ... in june > > oh that explains it > it's 75 here , 80 tomorrow and 86 on sunday
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπJenπππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ Dershmender ππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπΆη¬πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-06 14:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: π³οΈβπPING: Ivoπ³οΈβπ |
| Message-ID | <=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?=3D2aVEIJQ5NWXWTou@179.10.2.62=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?=3D> |
| In reply to | #632796 |
On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 04:05:11 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> determined that the following was of great importance to Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me>: =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= discourage drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= server is down? =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= much spam. =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= this. =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= paranoic tendancies. =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= might, be apropos here. =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= There is only one correct response: =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= <π©snickerTurdπ©> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= FU set appropriately. =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= TESTING - IGNORE: EXEC(awardz.php) FU set appropriately. -- "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> "Yeah, but you think everybody's Greg. There are a couple people here who can't resist responding to everything the aSSwurm or the Pussy Willow says. It does me no good to plonk aSSwurm and Pussy Willow if I still have to wade through a hundred inane posts a day involving those two assholes, so now I've plonked the chronic responders as well. They'll figure it out, and then they can make a choice... exchange stupid drivel with those two, or have more intelligent and interesting conversations with me. I know damned well Greg got sick of all that shit, and now I'm sick of it too. Those who choose to get led around by the lowest common denominator are fucking up AC and every other group they play that game in. If that's the kind of Usenet they want, they can wallow in the same slop as the two retards elsewhere, because they're only contributing to fucking this group up too. I can take or leave this shit, because I have plenty to keep me occupied with my room addition project, and it's a hell of a lot more rewarding than exchanging baby talk with the likes of the aSSwurm. May his fucking worthless AIDS-infested carcass drop fucking dead ASAP and quit wasting oxygen. To sum it up, talk to those two idiots elsewhere, or they'll probably be the only people left to talk to here." One can only presume that Jim and Creon/Vallor have solved this problem and are together in a private chat "having more intelligent and interesting conversations" instead of these "Civil" calls for shunning and authoritative control of discussion. As Seen on TV : <MPG.35cd7d50e1b224b1994604@news.altopia.com> "I'm pretty sure all gods are fictional, I'm smart enough to not proclaim I know this." - Kwills is only smart enough to doubt himself while arguing that a belief in imaginary made-up gods can't just be ignored as "mental illness" in <mo4q0j9tcqjt68s039loiacrbarihsh9i5@4ax.com> "If you worried half as much about your own personal life as you do everyone else's, you might almost be tolerable, obsessed stalker." -James "Checkmate" Gorman, in perhaps the most ironic and mentally-challenged statement ever made on Usenet. <MPG.4001ba2c14cace6c98cb6f@usnews.blocknews.net> "Trying to diminish others doesn't make you look any better. In fact, it does quite the opposite. Why are you always so bitter and angry? Do you have AIDS or something like so many other tranny girls do?" -James "Checkmate" Gorman in <MPG.405409befd41f28898969d@test.blocknews.net> "You should see my archive on you" -James "Checkmate" Gorman teases us with his "dosser" in <MPG.3eea81b23145043b98c338@usnews.blocknews.net> "Sorry, nothing to see here. The joint wasn't as bad as they say, but I'm not looking to go back. I'm a model citizen, clean as a whistle. I've owned my own home for 12 years, owned my own business almost as long, don't bother anyone and they don't bother me. You have nothing in any "police report" pertaining to me. Don't you think they would have "come a-knockin" a long time ago if they had any reason to? You're delusional and paranoid, and I have to wonder why. Oh... I should mention that there are a LOT of trannies in prison. I don't know why, but there are. The State even has to give them hormone shots for their tiddies at taxpayer's expense, and they wear bras and panties. I found everything about them revolting. That's why the whole "Bubba" thing is almost completely a myth, except in cell living. That shit wouldn't fly in a 100-man dorm, but trust me, those little trollops find ways to serve the willing when the lights go out. You see something, you keep your mouth shut about it because that way you don't get in a wreck. I never partook in such activities because the whole idea is just repulsive. I think that's a big part of what I don't like about you. I've seen how they act and I've talked to a few... total drama queens in every sense." -James "Checkmate" Gorman reminisces about prison in <MPG.3ceb37c2eddbaff98b07a@usnews.blocknews.net> "Not true. I've seen square waves on the oscilloscope from some certain generator. Square waves can be created from other than sine waves. Sine waves aren't everything (or anything you sick pervert %), I think that's the point you are missing. - Mathemagician "Lane Larson" in <939d6741-df96-5f2e-a444-b6dfd77de09e@stoat.inhoin.edu> seems to argue that square wave generators must use Fourier transforms "of course" to generate "almost" square waves... in his feeble attempt to quash my assertion that "square waves do not exist in reality" in post <=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?=3DKWuXdYTXCQ5ApC$@88.203.236.221=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?=3D>. Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-09 00:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #632796 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote: > Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in > news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >> >>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>> >>>>>Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini >>>>>*twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must >>>>>repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this >>>>>silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by >>>>>making it look like the server is down? >>> >>>>>In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's >>>>>first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it >>>>>prevents much spam. >>> >>>>I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something >>>>like this. >>> >>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>> paranoic tendancies. >> >> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There >> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just >> might, be apropos here. >> >>> There is only one correct response: >> >> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > > No thread you're ever in is productive. > >> <snicker> >> >> FU set appropriately. > > yep. Your froth only makes me stronger, kook. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-08 17:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ic6dnRu_LtK4FxH7nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #633101 |
Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote: > >> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in >> news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>> >>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini >>>>>> *twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must >>>>>> repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this >>>>>> silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by >>>>>> making it look like the server is down? >>>> >>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's >>>>>> first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it >>>>>> prevents much spam. >>>> >>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something >>>>> like this. >>>> >>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>> paranoic tendancies. >>> >>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There >>> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just >>> might, be apropos here. >>> >>>> There is only one correct response: >>> >>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >> >> No thread you're ever in is productive. >> >>> <snicker> >>> >>> FU set appropriately. >> >> yep. > > Your froth only makes me stronger, kook. > > <snicker> > talking to your shorts again
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-08 19:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <668c904a$0$983$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #633101 |
In article <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote: > > > Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in > > news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me: > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > >> > >>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: > >>>>On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>> > >>>>>Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini > >>>>>*twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must > >>>>>repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this > >>>>>silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by > >>>>>making it look like the server is down? > >>> > >>>>>In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's > >>>>>first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it > >>>>>prevents much spam. > >>> > >>>>I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network > >>>>problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to > >>>>investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something > >>>>like this. > >>> > >>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > >>> paranoic tendancies. > >> > >> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There > >> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just > >> might, be apropos here. > >> > >>> There is only one correct response: > >> > >> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by > >> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". > > > > No thread you're ever in is productive. > > > >> <snicker> > >> > >> FU set appropriately. > > > > yep. > > Your froth only makes me stronger, kook. > > <snicker> So you admit you need usenet to survive. Where is the whore Kensi?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-09 00:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lf402qFe7vqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #633108 |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote: >> >>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in >>> news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini >>>>>>> *twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must >>>>>>> repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this >>>>>>> silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by >>>>>>> making it look like the server is down? >>>>> >>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's >>>>>>> first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it >>>>>>> prevents much spam. >>>>> >>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something >>>>>> like this. >>>>> >>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>>> paranoic tendancies. >>>> >>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There >>>> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just >>>> might, be apropos here. >>>> >>>>> There is only one correct response: >>>> >>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >>> >>> No thread you're ever in is productive. >>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> FU set appropriately. >>> >>> yep. >> >> Your froth only makes me stronger, kook. >> >> <snicker> > > So you admit you need usenet to survive. Where is the whore Kensi? I'd like to see you live without it. In my bed with a few articles she's reading.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-07-09 00:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lf3vnvFe704U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #633101 |
Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote: > >> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in >> news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>> >>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini >>>>>> *twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must >>>>>> repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this >>>>>> silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by >>>>>> making it look like the server is down? >>>> >>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's >>>>>> first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it >>>>>> prevents much spam. >>>> >>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something >>>>> like this. >>>> >>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>> paranoic tendancies. >>> >>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There >>> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just >>> might, be apropos here. Add some birds and sticks and see what you can come up with. Shaking a bird at a stick is worth several stone of birds in the glass house. What it means: Robert was ready to eat my girl's pussy not before too long. The cafeteria serves a night time supplement at 9 pm. It was 8 pm. Robert says, "I'll be eating snacks in fifteen minutes." Trouble is, he'd already used that line on me approximately one Rabid Year earlier. 1 MO. LATER I'd give up several of my fish in the sea to bop him on the head with my girl's blue waffles. Sick George, Robert's brother ate her out today putting his slimy saliva all over her inflamed orifice. My bird is to not stick it in the face that hard. I have words from the old lore that depict in cave drawing the exact amplitude of scorn. Everyone here is doing it wrong and making enemies because of it. /*New Weapon*/ Birds who live in glass pipes shouldn't throw sticks in a stoning fight. We'll get on like a house on fire if you finish this one. -- A soiled bed pot never spoils. Few Americans know the glee of a bowl of miso shiro.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web