Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #64806
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: PING: Ivo |
| Followup-To | alt.checkmate |
| Date | 2024-07-05 04:05 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <v61csn$1p9b6$1@paganini.bofh.team> <v61glr$1rkpd$1@paganini.bofh.team> <v61hag$1o47o$6@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.checkmate
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: > >>>Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini *twice*? >>>The first connection always gets "reset" and one must repeat the action >>>to get it to successfully connect. Is this silliness meant to discourage >>>drive-by spammers or something by making it look like the server is down? > >>>In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's first >>>connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it prevents >>>much spam. > >>I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something like this. > > Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his > paranoic tendancies. ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just might, be apropos here. > There is only one correct response: And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". <snicker> FU set appropriately. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PING: Ivo kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-02 13:20 -0400
Re: PING: Ivo Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2024-07-02 20:24 +0200
Re: PING: Ivo "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2024-07-02 18:36 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-02 20:14 -0400
Re: PING: Ivo Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-05 04:05 +0000
Re: π³οΈβπPING: Ivoπ³οΈβπ πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπJenπππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ Dershmender ππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπΆη¬πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2024-07-06 14:03 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo Noel Barret <none@ar.com> - 2024-07-07 02:41 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-09 00:42 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2024-07-03 14:45 -0400
Re: PING: Ivo Ray Banana <rayban@raybanana.net> - 2024-07-03 21:54 +0200
Re: PING: Ivo David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2024-07-03 16:46 -0400
Re: PING: Ivo oxenheiser <bbqday@beach.x> - 2024-07-04 19:04 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2024-07-03 22:01 +0200
Re: PING: Ivo David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2024-07-03 17:19 -0400
Re: π³οΈβπPING: Ivoπ³οΈβπ πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπJenπππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ Dershmender ππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπΆη¬πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2024-07-02 19:22 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-02 19:41 -0400
Re: PING: Ivo anonymous assholery <yes@me.too> - 2024-07-02 13:25 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-02 19:39 -0400
csiph-web