Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #633136
| From | Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: PING: Ivo |
| Date | 2024-07-09 00:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lf402qFe7vqU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <v61hag$1o47o$6@dont-email.me> <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me> <v6cv8i$6uo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me> <668c904a$0$983$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
Skeeter wrote: > In article <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote: >> >>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in >>> news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote: >>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini >>>>>>> *twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must >>>>>>> repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this >>>>>>> silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by >>>>>>> making it look like the server is down? >>>>> >>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's >>>>>>> first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it >>>>>>> prevents much spam. >>>>> >>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network >>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to >>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something >>>>>> like this. >>>>> >>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his >>>>> paranoic tendancies. >>>> >>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There >>>> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just >>>> might, be apropos here. >>>> >>>>> There is only one correct response: >>>> >>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by >>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread". >>> >>> No thread you're ever in is productive. >>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> FU set appropriately. >>> >>> yep. >> >> Your froth only makes me stronger, kook. >> >> <snicker> > > So you admit you need usenet to survive. Where is the whore Kensi? I'd like to see you live without it. In my bed with a few articles she's reading.
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: PING: Ivo Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-05 04:05 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 13:04 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 12:26 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 13:34 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 12:36 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 15:04 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 14:17 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 15:45 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 14:56 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-05 16:51 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-05 15:57 -0700
Re: π³οΈβπPING: Ivoπ³οΈβπ πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπJenπππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ Dershmender ππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπΆη¬πππ»πΊπΉπ»ππ·πΊπ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2024-07-06 14:03 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-09 00:42 +0000
Re: PING: Ivo % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-07-08 17:53 -0700
Re: PING: Ivo Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-07-08 19:20 -0600
Re: PING: Ivo Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-09 00:27 -0500
Re: PING: Ivo Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-09 00:22 -0500
csiph-web