Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #168174 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 431 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:36 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:56 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:50 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:38 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:59 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:05 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:58 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:02 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:57 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:06 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 22:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:52 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:58 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 19:51 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:05 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 23:30 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 19:40 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:42 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 20:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:51 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 05:25 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 09:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 07:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 10:03 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 08:06 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 11:05 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-17 12:27 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:39 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:11 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:15 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:59 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:55 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:20 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:27 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:19 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-13 06:55 +0000
BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: BlueEyed Feminism. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:07 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:49 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-01 17:51 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:18 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:22 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:33 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:58 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:56 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:55 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:41 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 19:38 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:56 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:56 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:36 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:37 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:22 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 22:25 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-04 04:48 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:19 -0600
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:18 -0600
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:56 -0700
Re: The job market. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-06-03 04:03 +0000
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0600
Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 12:02 -0400
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:45 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:59 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 05:49 -0600
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-11 08:01 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 06:07 -0600
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:30 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 21:19 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:17 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 23:27 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:02 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:01 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-06 07:39 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-06 17:39 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Page 10 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 22 Next page →
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <1npvh3b.19ztjtmlewue8N%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #170253 |
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > So, what you're saying is you have no counterarguments *or* countervailing > evidence whatsoever to bring to bear against kensi. Gotcha. hormones in turmoil [points, laughs]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <RpCPC.36995$Kp4.3818@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #169695 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/30/2018 1:16 PM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 5:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> That's what I been saying, there are jobs, todays idiots want >> everything handed to them. > > No, we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able to > play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in 1960. > Same wages to cost of living ratio, same (inflation adjusted) housing > costs, same kinds of job opportunities and job security, including being > able to start in the mailroom and work your way up to corner office > through, you know, hard work and dedication. End the MBA/law degree > monopoly on decent-paying jobs with retirement plans and job security. > Restore the blue collar unions. Etc. > So, "Kanzi" you agree with Nads, that the only people of value to society are those who work for someone else for a salary, who must do exactly what they are told, who must eat what the company store sells and live in the company housing. Your only complaint is that you want everybody to be screwed the same! It never occurs to your pointy little head that by having bosses (no matter if it's a CEO or a "party bureaucrat" that the system is rigged from the start. This kind of thing was tested in the largest social experiment the world has ever seen and it was a massive fail in spite of being propped up with the murder of a hundred million innocent citizens. That how evil ad stupid you are. Didn't you get the memo that your ideas are now totally discredited and almost universally abandoned? Your idea of workers as slaves for their "smarter" betters totally removes any incentive to invent new things. No Blll Gates, no Elon Musk, no Jeff Bezos and that means NONE of the things they created and gave to civilization either. And it's worse than that. You also want to "smash" all small business. Hey those clowns don't answer to any boss or get any salary! Fuck em. In your commie terms they are called "the bourgeoisie" and the goal is to destroy ALL small business and all the energy and creativity that goes with it. All shop keepers, all services, anyone who is not obeying a boss and working for the "salary" they are deigned to be given. This is a truly stupid and ignorant plan totally at odds with reality which means that only a drug-soaked lib has the fantasy level to think it could work. You are truly an anachronism, otherwise we could just ship your worthless ignorant ass to your Utopia USSR and forget about your drooling blather.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700 |
| Subject | " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.30--1.27pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #169695 |
"kensi" wrote: > Restore the blue collar unions. Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed North Korea ? Not _once_ can you give me an example of "who does it best", and I've been asking you for many months now. > we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able to > play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in 1960. 1960 isn't returning, thank God. Besides, your vision of the future excludes today's White men ( and Asians ) -- you divide to conquer ; good luck with that, " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. U.S. tax records show that 50% of adults were married in 2015, down from 72% in 1960. The Washington Post says: one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly doubling since 1960. more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least 130 years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. |
| Message-ID | <fn8g46Fn8m1U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #169760 |
On 5/30/18 1:27 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > "kensi" wrote: >> Restore the blue collar unions. > > Like BlueEyed Norway, or BrownEyed North Korea ? > > Not _once_ can you give me an example of "who does it best", > and I've been asking you for many months now. > >> we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able to >> play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in 1960. > > 1960 isn't returning, thank God. Besides, your vision of the future > excludes today's White men ( and Asians ) -- you divide to conquer ; > good luck with that, " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. > > U.S. tax records show that 50% of adults were married in 2015, > down from 72% in 1960. > > The Washington Post says: > > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > > Both numbers have increased dramatically in > recent decades, roughly doubling since 1960. > > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were > living with their parents than with a spouse or partner, > the first time that's happened in at least 130 years. > Excludes white men? Excludes Asians? What? Seriously, where do you come up with such nonsense? And people are doing less well financially now because we have more income redistribution to the very rich. Wages have gone up FAR less than has the cost of housing, education, food, and the like. It is insane... and the right wing plays identity politics and instead of working for equality and building a better tie between productivity and financial reward, they push for blaming of minorities. It is sick. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <g4mPC.182902$g%2.88546@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #169461 |
On 5/29/2018 4:16 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full >>>>>>>>> living expenses, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>>>> be? >>>>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor >>>>>>> job, >>>>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>>>> about it. >>>>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having >>>>>> to find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys >>>>>> we're all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. >>>>>> It's not "right" >>>>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, >>>>>> sell or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of >>>>>> our lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make >>>>>> it, some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human >>>>>> race will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too >>>>>> clever for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>>>> >>>>> Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>>>> productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>>>> sky- >>>>> high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>>>> have dared dream of such a big increase? >>>>> >>>>> Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >>>> >>>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >>>> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >>>> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. >>> >>> I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for >>> pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of >>> manual labor a week and making it so that food security is only for >>> stockbrokers, >>> doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than >>> enough roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, >>> yet huge echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee >>> landlords sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>> of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>> streets...). >> >> So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. > > I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to my > privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things I take for > granted. > Well then give your stuff too them! Clearly you are simply the Idle rich and don't care at all about your fellow humans who are only looking for a better life! How many Hispanic "Immigrants" are you supporting in your home. My guess is ZERO. Libs only spend OTHER PEOPLE"S money, never their own. You are nothing but a lying hypocrite. Do you even SPEAK Spanish?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3576b3b768edf1b2993b8d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #169217 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <peif8c$ooj$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > >> >>Lots of people can't find work. > >> > > >> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. > >> > >> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work needing > >> doing even as the population grows. > >> > >> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living > >> >>expenses, > >> > > >> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. > >> > >> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should be? > >> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, > >> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that start > >> at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not even > >> enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without additional > >> income from one source or another -- and there is no upward ladder from > >> most jobs. > >> > >> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate about > >> it. > >> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by > >> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing that > >> happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about it? > > > > Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. > > Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to > > find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're all > > so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not "right" > > or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this > > technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If your > > job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or > > repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our lives. > > It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, some will > > not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has quickened, and will > > continue to do so. At some point, the human race will have managed to > > destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its own good. I > > see no other outcome. > > Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when > productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is sky- > high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't have > dared dream of such a big increase? > > Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and processes have made production more efficient and economical. What would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same time? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pejg9e$15ub$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169234 |
On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and processes > have made production more efficient and economical. What would you > propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is today's production > efficiency due to more efficient methods of production suddenly a new > issue? It's been going on at least as long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. > Do you think the latest smart phones that everyone just HAS to have, > could be as compact and feature-packed as they are without the very > technology that you decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at > the same time? I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter, koOk. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <7shqgd5b930um5jppimoloba3nqoj2ugdg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169248 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and processes >> have made production more efficient and economical. What would you >> propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is today's production >> efficiency due to more efficient methods of production suddenly a new >> issue? It's been going on at least as long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. >> Do you think the latest smart phones that everyone just HAS to have, >> could be as compact and feature-packed as they are without the very >> technology that you decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at >> the same time? > >I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. > >Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter, >koOk. So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things? Get a better job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekchg$ooj$36@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #169258 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is today's >>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production >>> suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as long as Eli >>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that >>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as >>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably >>> personally benefiting from at the same time? >> >>I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >> >>Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter, >>koOk. > > So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things? I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. > Get a better job. I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it gets better: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <bah262.ndb.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #169463 |
On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is today's >>>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production >>>> suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as long as Eli >>>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that >>>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as >>>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably >>>> personally benefiting from at the same time? >>> >>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>> >>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter, >>> koOk. >> >> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things? > > I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. > >> Get a better job. > > I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in > this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it gets better: > > http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 > get two jobs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <brdrgdto1k2nvi8mi37qdn6k3t8k9ju6u4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169466 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is today's >>>>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production >>>>> suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as long as Eli >>>>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that >>>>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as >>>>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably >>>>> personally benefiting from at the same time? >>>> >>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>> >>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter, >>>> koOk. >>> >>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things? >> >> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >> >>> Get a better job. >> >> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in >> this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it gets better: >> >> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >> >get two jobs I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, they want more money than a job is worth and find it easier to let the left feed them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekdb5$ooj$43@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #169477 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>> time? >>>>> >>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>> >>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>> latter, >>>>> koOk. >>>> >>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>> things? >>> >>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>> >>>> Get a better job. >>> >>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>> gets better: >>> >>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>> >>get two jobs > > I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are > people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, > they want more money than a job is worth No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of living in the area where the job is located. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <bah33e.9lk.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #169479 |
On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>> time? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>> latter, >>>>>> koOk. >>>>> >>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>> things? >>>> >>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>> >>>>> Get a better job. >>>> >>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>> gets better: >>>> >>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>> >>> get two jobs >> >> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >> they want more money than a job is worth > > No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of > living in the area where the job is located. > get 2 jobs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekflg$13fa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169481 |
On 5/29/2018 7:35 AM, % wrote: > On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>>> latter, koOk. >>>>>> >>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>>> things? >>>>> >>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>>> >>>>>> Get a better job. >>>>> >>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>>> gets better: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>>> >>>> get two jobs >>> >>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >>> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >>> they want more money than a job is worth >> >> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >> living in the area where the job is located. >> > get 2 jobs Some people get 9 jobs. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <d4hrgd9br8jdpt6dsjucoca0esotqlm4m2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169499 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:11:14 -0400, mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >On 5/29/2018 7:35 AM, % wrote: >> On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>>>> latter, koOk. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>>>> things? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Get a better job. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>>>> gets better: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>>>> >>>>> get two jobs >>>> >>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >>>> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >>>> they want more money than a job is worth >>> >>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >>> living in the area where the job is located. >>> >> get 2 jobs > >Some people get 9 jobs. That's 8 someone else could have, don't tell me there is no work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <dhirgdtfboqr0egl73m7fph3puia099suk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169504 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:40:08 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-29 11:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:11:14 -0400, mixed nuts >> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >> >>> On 5/29/2018 7:35 AM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>>>>>> latter, koOk. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>>>>>> things? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Get a better job. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>>>>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>>>>>> gets better: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> get two jobs >>>>>> >>>>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >>>>>> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >>>>>> they want more money than a job is worth >>>>> >>>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >>>>> living in the area where the job is located. >>>>> >>>> get 2 jobs >>> >>> Some people get 9 jobs. >> >> >> That's 8 someone else could have, don't tell me there is no work. >> >start your own job and hire yourself , wait , would you hire you only for the grunt work
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <8qirgdt0ch24mu05cc7e3921vi24gbafnj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169508 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:50:10 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-29 11:46 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:40:08 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-29 11:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:11:14 -0400, mixed nuts >>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/29/2018 7:35 AM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>>>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>>>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>>>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>>>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>>>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>>>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>>>>>>>> latter, koOk. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>>>>>>>> things? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Get a better job. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>>>>>>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>>>>>>>> gets better: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> get two jobs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >>>>>>>> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >>>>>>>> they want more money than a job is worth >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >>>>>>> living in the area where the job is located. >>>>>>> >>>>>> get 2 jobs >>>>> >>>>> Some people get 9 jobs. >>>> >>>> >>>> That's 8 someone else could have, don't tell me there is no work. >>>> >>> start your own job and hire yourself , wait , would you hire you >> >> only for the grunt work >> >would you pay yourself well only whats fair
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <l9jrgd1m4mb5l4j5r8547bj3tncaob15e3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169510 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:56:26 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-29 11:51 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:50:10 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-29 11:46 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:40:08 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-29 11:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:11:14 -0400, mixed nuts >>>>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 7:35 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> latter, koOk. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>>>>>>>>>> things? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Get a better job. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>>>>>>>>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>>>>>>>>>> gets better: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> get two jobs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >>>>>>>>>> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >>>>>>>>>> they want more money than a job is worth >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >>>>>>>>> living in the area where the job is located. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> get 2 jobs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some people get 9 jobs. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's 8 someone else could have, don't tell me there is no work. >>>>>> >>>>> start your own job and hire yourself , wait , would you hire you >>>> >>>> only for the grunt work >>>> >>> would you pay yourself well >> >> only whats fair >> >wait until you ask you for a raise im sure it will be well earned
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <vpjrgdt2asvlnrki21rbprb8qo35hqo9oe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169514 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 15:03:16 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-29 11:59 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:56:26 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-29 11:51 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:50:10 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-29 11:46 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:40:08 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 11:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:11:14 -0400, mixed nuts >>>>>>>> <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 7:35 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:31 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latter, koOk. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get a better job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets better: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> get two jobs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >>>>>>>>>>>> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >>>>>>>>>>>> they want more money than a job is worth >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >>>>>>>>>>> living in the area where the job is located. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> get 2 jobs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some people get 9 jobs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's 8 someone else could have, don't tell me there is no work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> start your own job and hire yourself , wait , would you hire you >>>>>> >>>>>> only for the grunt work >>>>>> >>>>> would you pay yourself well >>>> >>>> only whats fair >>>> >>> wait until you ask you for a raise >> >> im sure it will be well earned >> >slave drivin prick i hate me but i need the work
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <9aergd1pl7srgdqpn4829nkbu674f0ctvp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169479 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:31:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi >>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and >>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical. What >>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding? How is >>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of >>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue? It's been going on at least as >>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart >>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and >>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you >>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same >>>>>>> time? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she >>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely >>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the >>>>>> latter, >>>>>> koOk. >>>>> >>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these >>>>> things? >>>> >>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake. >>>> >>>>> Get a better job. >>>> >>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find >>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it >>>> gets better: >>>> >>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455 >>>> >>>get two jobs >> >> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are >> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy, >> they want more money than a job is worth > >No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of >living in the area where the job is located. Why did you snip Nads? Censorship? The lefty way of debate? People want morons like you to feed them, they are brought up to be lazy and expecting. There are plenty of jobs, I would work for meager wages than sit on my ass collecting dole money while crying about it all the time. California comes to mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 22 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web