Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #169234

Re: Nadegda must be proud.

From Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate, sci.physics, talk.politics.guns
Subject Re: Nadegda must be proud.
Date 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Organization Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID <MPG.3576b3b768edf1b2993b8d@news.altopia.com> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <pefnlh$ooj$8@dont-email.me> <6psmgddmd50gse03r7q3cigoik545a9qpt@4ax.com> <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me> <MPG.35763500ba03ee6b993b86@news.altopia.com> <peif8c$ooj$22@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <peif8c$ooj$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> >> >>Lots of people can't find work.
> >> > 
> >> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere.
> >> 
> >> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work needing
> >> doing even as the population grows.
> >> 
> >> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living
> >> >>expenses,
> >> > 
> >> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards.
> >> 
> >> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should be?
> >> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job,
> >> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that start
> >> at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not even
> >> enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without additional
> >> income from one source or another -- and there is no upward ladder from
> >> most jobs.
> >> 
> >> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate about
> >> it.
> >> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by
> >> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing that
> >> happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about it?
> > 
> > Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age.
> > Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to
> > find ways to change with it.  The complicated electronic toys we're all
> > so addicted to could not be built by any other means.  It's not "right"
> > or "wrong," it just is.  What would you do... make laws to ban this
> > technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us?  If your
> > job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or
> > repair robots.  We're locked into change in every aspect of our lives.
> > It's a matter of adaptation and survival.  Some will make it, some will
> > not.  It's always been that way.  Only the pace has quickened, and will
> > continue to do so.  At some point, the human race will have managed to
> > destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its own good.  I
> > see no other outcome.
> 
> Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when 
> productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is sky-
> high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't have 
> dared dream of such a big increase?
> 
> Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P

Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and processes 
have made production more efficient and economical.  What would you 
propose as a "solution"... featherbedding?  How is today's production 
efficiency due to more efficient methods of production suddenly a new 
issue?  It's been going on at least as long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin.  
Do you think the latest smart phones that everyone just HAS to have, 
could be as compact and feature-packed as they are without the very 
technology that you decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at 
the same time?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
          Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
            Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
              Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400

csiph-web