Re: Nadegda must be proud.

From	Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate, sci.physics, talk.politics.guns
Subject	Re: Nadegda must be proud.
Date	2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<pekdb5$ooj$43@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <pejg9e$15ub$2@gioia.aioe.org> <7shqgd5b930um5jppimoloba3nqoj2ugdg@4ax.com> <pekchg$ooj$36@dont-email.me> <bah262.ndb.19.3@news.alt.net> <brdrgdto1k2nvi8mi37qdn6k3t8k9ju6u4@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:

> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and
>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical.  What
>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding?  How is
>>>>>> today's production efficiency due to more efficient methods of
>>>>>> production suddenly a new issue?  It's been going on at least as
>>>>>> long as Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart
>>>>>> phones that everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and
>>>>>> feature-packed as they are without the very technology that you
>>>>>> decry, but are probably personally benefiting from at the same
>>>>>> time?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she
>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely
>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the
>>>>> latter,
>>>>> koOk.
>>>>
>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these
>>>> things?
>>> 
>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake.
>>> 
>>>> Get a better job.
>>> 
>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find
>>> one in this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it
>>> gets better:
>>> 
>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455
>>> 
>>get two jobs
> 
> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there are
> people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to lazy,
> they want more money than a job is worth

No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of 
living in the area where the job is located.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

Thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
          Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
            Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
              Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400

csiph-web