Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #59825 > unrolled thread

Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-13 19:28 -0700
    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-14 13:45 +1000
    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-14 23:12 +0000
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 19:19 -0400
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 00:00 +0000
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 18:24 -0600
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:46 -0700
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 20:49 -0400
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:37 -0700
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:36 -0700
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 17:33 -0600
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:38 -0700
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:21 +1000
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:35 -0700
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:20 +1000
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 14:17 -0700
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:28 +0000
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 15:28 -0700
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 22:47 +0000
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0600
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 16:53 -0700
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-15 23:17 -0600
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 23:03 -0700
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 08:01 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-16 08:46 -0600
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 17:54 +0100
                        -- I Don't Understand Much Mathematics Either But I Did on 1 June 2003 Have This Momentary Whimsical Inspiration dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-17 03:25 +1000
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 07:58 +0100
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 00:36 +0000
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-17 00:25 -0600
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:11 +0000
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:54 -0600
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-16 15:57 -0700
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 08:49 +1000
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 07:00 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:41 +0100
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 00:23 -0700
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 20:32 +1000
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:57 +0100
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:55 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:38 +0100
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:28 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 10:23 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:17 -0600
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-18 14:12 -0400
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 16:30 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 13:55 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-31 17:09 -0400
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 15:19 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-08-01 11:36 -0400
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-08-01 20:44 +0000
                              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 14:02 -0700
                                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-08-01 22:09 +0100
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0100
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-02 06:09 +0200
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:20 -0600
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:34 +0100
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:25 -0700
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-07-19 09:59 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-21 15:59 +0200
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:30 -0700
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 16:14 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 08:54 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 10:45 -0600
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:09 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:58 -0600
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 13:29 -0500
                              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 14:57 -0400
                                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:07 -0700
                                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 15:18 -0500
                                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:22 -0700
                                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:57 -0400
                                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:08 -0500
                                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:05 -0500
                                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:55 -0400
                                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:06 -0500
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:48 +0000
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 17:53 +0100
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:16 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:49 +0000
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:04 -0700
                              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:10 -0600
                                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:16 -0700
                                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:31 -0600
                                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 18:38 -0700
                                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 20:01 -0600
                                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-19 19:11 -0700
                            Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-20 22:48 -0700
                              Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-21 07:45 +0100
                                Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:23 -0700
                                  Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-21 20:30 -0700
                                    Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 23:45 -0700
                                  Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 08:53 +0100
                              Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:24 +1000
                              Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:33 +1000
                                Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-21 11:57 -0400
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:41 +0100
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:57 -0600
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-07-19 19:27 +0100
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:06 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:36 +0100
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:56 -0600
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:45 +0100
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-20 06:38 -0600
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 17:21 +0100
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:10 -0400
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:14 -0600
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0700
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:05 -0400
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:09 -0600
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:24 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:41 -0600
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:48 -0400
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:11 -0600
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:04 -0700
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 20:08 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:12 -0700
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:17 -0600
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:56 -0700
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-17 23:34 +0200
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:07 -0500
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 21:07 -0700
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-15 18:26 -0400

Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  Next page →

#60378

In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
@btinternet.com says...
> 
> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, 
> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> >@btinternet.com says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
> >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> >> >@btinternet.com says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, DoW #2"
> >> >> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says...
> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote
> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just 
> >> >> >> >>how he does
> >> >> >> >> it that you object to?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a 
> >> >> >> >>"breath of
> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the 
> >> >> >> >>awards from
> >> >> >> >> happening now are you?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
> >> >> >
> >> >>

So you and one other person is the majority?

-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60380

Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> wrote:

> In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> @btinternet.com says...
> > 
> > In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
> > DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
> > >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> > >@btinternet.com says...
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
> > >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
> > >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> > >> >@btinternet.com says...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, 
> > >> >> "Sn!pe, DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
> > >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
> > >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> > >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says...
> > >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
> > >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote
> > >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just
> > >> >> >> >>how he does
> > >> >> >> >> it that you object to?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a
> > >> >> >> >>"breath of
> > >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the
> > >> >> >> >>awards from
> > >> >> >> >> happening now are you?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> 
> So you and one other person is the majority?
>
 
What, Checky and I?  Hardly.
 
-- 
^Ï^.        Sn!pe,  AUK DoW #2       <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, August 2015  (award now deprecated)
0 %
 
My pet rock Gordon just is.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60390

In article <MPG.31f817dd66aeddc39896a5@news.eternal-september.org>, 
Skidaddle@chote.com says...


> 
> In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> @btinternet.com says...
> > 
> > In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, 
> > DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
> > >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> > >@btinternet.com says...
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
> > >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
> > >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> > >> >@btinternet.com says...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, DoW #2"
> > >> >> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
> > >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
> > >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> > >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says...
> > >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
> > >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote
> > >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just 
> > >> >> >> >>how he does
> > >> >> >> >> it that you object to?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a 
> > >> >> >> >>"breath of
> > >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the 
> > >> >> >> >>awards from
> > >> >> >> >> happening now are you?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> 
> So you and one other person is the majority?

It's a parako0k!

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60460

In message <MPG.31f817dd66aeddc39896a5@news.eternal-september.org>, 
Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
>In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>@btinternet.com says...
>>
>> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
>> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>> >@btinternet.com says...
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
>> >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
>> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>> >> >@btinternet.com says...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, 
>> >> >>"Sn!pe, DoW #2"
>> >> >> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
>> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
>> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>> >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
>> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote
>> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just
>> >> >> >> >>how he does
>> >> >> >> >> it that you object to?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a
>> >> >> >> >>"breath of
>> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the
>> >> >> >> >>awards from
>> >> >> >> >> happening now are you?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>
>So you and one other person is the majority?
>

I never really cared for what the majority thinks.  It's just fashion 
and fashions change.

-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

"actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." -
Mister Smartypants in AUK.

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley

Janitor's BFF #4
#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60425

On 2016-07-19 9:54 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
> @btinternet.com says...
>
>
>>
>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, DoW #2"
>>>> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote
>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just how he does
>>>>>>>> it that you object to?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a "breath of
>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the awards from
>>>>>>>> happening now are you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some KooKs think differently.
>>>
>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't
>>> see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped.
>>>
>>
>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right.
>> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is
>> just because you say I can't.
>
> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the
> rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely
> legitimate.  I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you
> an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would
> buy that either.
>

What makes the chicken fucker think Usenet is a "democracy".  I mean 
other than his over inflated sense of self-worth.


-- 
The was a old guy named binky
Whose thumb began to smell stinky
He made his mom gasp, pulling it out of his ass
And stuck it in his mouth like a Twinkie.
Anonymous

So why can't you accept that he's an idiot and move on?
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60462

In message <nmmlnd$mug$2@dont-email.me>, Idlehands 
<hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes
>On 2016-07-19 9:54 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>> @btinternet.com says...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
>>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, DoW #2"
>>>>> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>>>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote
>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just how he does
>>>>>>>>> it that you object to?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a 
>>>>>>>>>"breath of
>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the awards from
>>>>>>>>> happening now are you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some KooKs think differently.
>>>>
>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't
>>>> see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right.
>>> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is
>>> just because you say I can't.
>>
>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the
>> rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely
>> legitimate.  I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you
>> an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would
>> buy that either.
>>
>
>What makes the chicken fucker think Usenet is a "democracy".  I mean 
>other than his over inflated sense of self-worth.
>
>

Spoken like a true bully boy with no concern for the opinions of others.

-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

"actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." -
Mister Smartypants in AUK.

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley

Janitor's BFF #4
#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60465

On 2016-07-20 12:45 AM, Bill Jillians wrote:
> In message <nmmlnd$mug$2@dont-email.me>, Idlehands
> <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes
>> On 2016-07-19 9:54 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
>>>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
>>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe,
>>>>>> DoW #2"
>>>>>> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
>>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
>>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>>>>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote
>>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just how
>>>>>>>>>> he does
>>>>>>>>>> it that you object to?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a
>>>>>>>>>> "breath of
>>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the
>>>>>>>>>> awards from
>>>>>>>>>> happening now are you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some KooKs think differently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't
>>>>> see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right.
>>>> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is
>>>> just because you say I can't.
>>>
>>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the
>>> rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely
>>> legitimate.  I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you
>>> an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would
>>> buy that either.
>>>
>>
>> What makes the chicken fucker think Usenet is a "democracy".  I mean
>> other than his over inflated sense of self-worth.
>>
>>
>
> Spoken like a true bully boy with no concern for the opinions of others.
>

Were you shedding a few tears while writing the above?  Of course 
opinions are like assholes and everyone has one, however the opinions of 
assholes such as yourself are of no importance to me.

Suck on it chicken fucker.



-- 
The was a old guy named binky
Whose thumb began to smell stinky
He made his mom gasp, pulling it out of his ass
And stuck it in his mouth like a Twinkie.
Anonymous

So why can't you accept that he's an idiot and move on?
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60469

In message <nmnrbd$tvb$2@dont-email.me>, Idlehands 
<hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes
>On 2016-07-20 12:45 AM, Bill Jillians wrote:
>> In message <nmmlnd$mug$2@dont-email.me>, Idlehands
>> <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes
>>> On 2016-07-19 9:54 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate,
>>>>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes
>>>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe,
>>>>>>> DoW #2"
>>>>>>> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes
>>>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes
>>>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649
>>>>>>>>>> @btinternet.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore
>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote
>>>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just how
>>>>>>>>>>> he does
>>>>>>>>>>> it that you object to?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a
>>>>>>>>>>> "breath of
>>>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the
>>>>>>>>>>> awards from
>>>>>>>>>>> happening now are you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They're stopped.  HTH  HAND  HORSE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some KooKs think differently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't
>>>>>> see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right.
>>>>> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is
>>>>> just because you say I can't.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the
>>>> rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely
>>>> legitimate.  I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you
>>>> an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would
>>>> buy that either.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What makes the chicken fucker think Usenet is a "democracy".  I mean
>>> other than his over inflated sense of self-worth.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Spoken like a true bully boy with no concern for the opinions of others.
>>
>
>Were you shedding a few tears while writing the above?  Of course 
>opinions are like assholes and everyone has one, however the opinions 
>of assholes such as yourself are of no importance to me.
>
>Suck on it chicken fucker.
>
>
>

So why reply to so many of them ... Mr. Liar?

-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

"actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." -
Mister Smartypants in AUK.

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley

Janitor's BFF #4
#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60446

Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in:
<nmedsg$e19$36@dont-email.me>
///
>
>Because the awards had become corrupted under Ferd Hall and had likely 
>been corrupt for some time, all awarded kooks were granted a one-time 
>amnesty during the Coup of 2012. Some have since re-earned kook status, 
>but Yads was not, so far as I can recall, among them.

So this "Yads" is now a "Nads" buddy despite being deemed by "Nads" a
"kook" prior to a "Nads" supposed "coup" :-/

faaark me... if publishers around the Globe haven't put ewe on a ban list
then ewe are the monkey they are bidding to NASA for a "black hole"
mission.
-- 
fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n]

*** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000
[Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows".
*** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500
"The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a 
decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60039

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

<...>

>I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, 
>party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.  Tell me how that 
>shows anything BUT failure?

It shows failure on your behalf -- failure to embrace reality and
continuing to live in your drug-addled mind where YOU get to make
all the rules. Why, you are a regular *Train Man*, aren't you. "Down 
here, I make the rules!

>Still waiting for your bonafides, although I think it's quite clear from 
>everyone else here, that there's no support for another FNVW, 
>regardless.  Of course, that doesn't mean that you can't continue to 
>have your little pretend "tea party" with your imaginary friends.

So wait some more because she's got NO reason to answer to you who
are but a petty dictator who cries when he doesn't get his way. 

What a big SISSY!

-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60042

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:10:16 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>
><...>
>
>>I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, 
>>party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.  Tell me how that 
>>shows anything BUT failure?
>
>It shows failure on your behalf -- failure to embrace reality and
>continuing to live in your drug-addled mind where YOU get to make
>all the rules. Why, you are a regular *Train Man*, aren't you. "Down 
>here, I make the rules!
>
>>Still waiting for your bonafides, although I think it's quite clear from 
>>everyone else here, that there's no support for another FNVW, 
>>regardless.  Of course, that doesn't mean that you can't continue to 
>>have your little pretend "tea party" with your imaginary friends.
>
>So wait some more because she's got NO reason to answer to you who
>are but a petty dictator who cries when he doesn't get his way. 
>
>What a big SISSY!


All in all, the awards are not recognized.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60067

In article <44riob1k5rq9gicoej7v826jobcfa74gnm@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
> >I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, 
> >party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.  Tell me how that 
> >shows anything BUT failure?
> 
> It shows failure on your behalf -- failure to embrace reality and
> continuing to live in your drug-addled mind where YOU get to make
> all the rules. Why, you are a regular *Train Man*, aren't you. "Down 
> here, I make the rules!
> 
> >Still waiting for your bonafides, although I think it's quite clear from 
> >everyone else here, that there's no support for another FNVW, 
> >regardless.  Of course, that doesn't mean that you can't continue to 
> >have your little pretend "tea party" with your imaginary friends.
> 
> So wait some more because she's got NO reason to answer to you who
> are but a petty dictator who cries when he doesn't get his way. 
> 
> What a big SISSY!

Perhaps I've beaten more butthurt out of you than you can cope with... 
sure sounds like it.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60035

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:28:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

<...>

>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
>> driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting
>> up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to
>> be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.
>> When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to
>> resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's
>> why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also
>> why S/H/IT is failing so badly.
>
>For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* panties 
>in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite spectacularly, 
>particularly dolf and murphy.

Indeed!  Checkmate becomes more obsessed by you as time passes.

It's got so the Rube eats, breathes, drinks and dreams about 
how you and kensi are constantly exposing him for the little
petty tryant he's revealed himself to be of late. The poor baby
just can't understand how his saying the Ko0k Awards are dead
doesn't mean they are dead anywhere but from the perspective
of his bloated ego.

I think he and Phlatty would make great bedfellows in that they 
both have this fetish about controlling that which is none of 
their business trying to control. Fucking busybodies, worse than
most catty females, IMO. 




-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60037

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:05:27 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:28:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>
><...>
>
>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
>>> driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting
>>> up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to
>>> be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.
>>> When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to
>>> resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's
>>> why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also
>>> why S/H/IT is failing so badly.
>>
>>For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* panties 
>>in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite spectacularly, 
>>particularly dolf and murphy.
>
>Indeed!  Checkmate becomes more obsessed by you as time passes.
>
>It's got so the Rube eats, breathes, drinks and dreams about 
>how you and kensi are constantly exposing him for the little
>petty tryant he's revealed himself to be of late. The poor baby
>just can't understand how his saying the Ko0k Awards are dead
>doesn't mean they are dead anywhere but from the perspective
>of his bloated ego.
>
>I think he and Phlatty would make great bedfellows in that they 
>both have this fetish about controlling that which is none of 
>their business trying to control. Fucking busybodies, worse than
>most catty females, IMO. 


And yet the awards are still defunct.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60047

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:09:01 -0600, Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:

<...>

>And yet the awards are still defunct.


You must not read too thoroughly as I have seen three Nadegda
Ko0k Awards presentations to date and they were all quite 
entertaining and more true to the original spirit of the 
awards than those Burnore and his gang of DataBasux pshychos
ran. 

We should all embrace the latest iterations of the Ko0k Awards
for they are the real McCoy.



-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60054

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:24:21 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:09:01 -0600, Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:
>
><...>
>
>>And yet the awards are still defunct.
>
>
>You must not read too thoroughly as I have seen three Nadegda
>Ko0k Awards presentations to date and they were all quite 
>entertaining and more true to the original spirit of the 
>awards than those Burnore and his gang of DataBasux pshychos
>ran. 
>
>We should all embrace the latest iterations of the Ko0k Awards
>for they are the real McCoy.


What awards were we talking about.

<thanks for the agent you phag and i mean it with all my hart>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60056

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:41:29 -0600, Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:24:21 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:
>>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:09:01 -0600, Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>><...>
>>
>>>And yet the awards are still defunct.
>>
>>You must not read too thoroughly as I have seen three Nadegda
>>Ko0k Awards presentations to date and they were all quite 
>>entertaining and more true to the original spirit of the 
>>awards than those Burnore and his gang of DataBasux pshychos
>>ran. 
>>
>>We should all embrace the latest iterations of the Ko0k Awards
>>for they are the real McCoy.
>
>What awards were we talking about.
>
><thanks for the agent you phag and i mean it with all my hart>

You're welcome but I might expect a favor (wink wink) 
sometime in the near future. LOL.

Oh, you should thank Nugyn Trang who cracked the key
code. Oh, you should disable to check for updates option
if you haven't done so already.











-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60072

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:48:10 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:41:29 -0600, Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:
>>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:24:21 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:09:01 -0600, Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>><...>
>>>
>>>>And yet the awards are still defunct.
>>>
>>>You must not read too thoroughly as I have seen three Nadegda
>>>Ko0k Awards presentations to date and they were all quite 
>>>entertaining and more true to the original spirit of the 
>>>awards than those Burnore and his gang of DataBasux pshychos
>>>ran. 
>>>
>>>We should all embrace the latest iterations of the Ko0k Awards
>>>for they are the real McCoy.
>>
>>What awards were we talking about.
>>
>><thanks for the agent you phag and i mean it with all my hart>
>
>You're welcome but I might expect a favor (wink wink) 
>sometime in the near future. LOL.
>
>Oh, you should thank Nugyn Trang who cracked the key
>code. Oh, you should disable to check for updates option
>if you haven't done so already.


Same copy I had before, Nugyn Trang  and I know about the auto
updates.
Agent is long gone from the torrents, so thanks again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60065

In article <unqiobhn8cjevqo20k4of22kihbdko438e@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:28:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
> >> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
> >> driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting
> >> up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to
> >> be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.
> >> When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to
> >> resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's
> >> why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also
> >> why S/H/IT is failing so badly.
> >
> >For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* panties 
> >in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite spectacularly, 
> >particularly dolf and murphy.
> 
> Indeed!  Checkmate becomes more obsessed by you as time passes.
> 
> It's got so the Rube eats, breathes, drinks and dreams about 
> how you and kensi are constantly exposing him for the little
> petty tryant he's revealed himself to be of late. The poor baby
> just can't understand how his saying the Ko0k Awards are dead
> doesn't mean they are dead anywhere but from the perspective
> of his bloated ego.
> 
> I think he and Phlatty would make great bedfellows in that they 
> both have this fetish about controlling that which is none of 
> their business trying to control. Fucking busybodies, worse than
> most catty females, IMO. 

I've certainly slapped a lot of butthurt out of you lately.  I hope it 
hasn't ruined your sex life.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#60068

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:04:34 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>In article <unqiobhn8cjevqo20k4of22kihbdko438e@4ax.com>, 
>greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:28:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>> 
>> <...>
>> 
>> >> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
>> >> driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting
>> >> up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to
>> >> be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.
>> >> When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to
>> >> resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's
>> >> why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also
>> >> why S/H/IT is failing so badly.
>> >
>> >For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* panties 
>> >in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite spectacularly, 
>> >particularly dolf and murphy.
>> 
>> Indeed!  Checkmate becomes more obsessed by you as time passes.
>> 
>> It's got so the Rube eats, breathes, drinks and dreams about 
>> how you and kensi are constantly exposing him for the little
>> petty tryant he's revealed himself to be of late. The poor baby
>> just can't understand how his saying the Ko0k Awards are dead
>> doesn't mean they are dead anywhere but from the perspective
>> of his bloated ego.
>> 
>> I think he and Phlatty would make great bedfellows in that they 
>> both have this fetish about controlling that which is none of 
>> their business trying to control. Fucking busybodies, worse than
>> most catty females, IMO. 
>
>I've certainly slapped a lot of butthurt out of you lately.  I hope it 
>hasn't ruined your sex life.

Miss Kitty ruined my sex life.   ;-)


-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web