Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #59825 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-13 19:28 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-15 18:26 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 129 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-13 19:28 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-14 13:45 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 19:19 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 00:00 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 18:24 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:46 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 20:49 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:37 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:36 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 17:33 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:38 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:21 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:35 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:20 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 14:17 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:28 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 15:28 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 22:47 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 16:53 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-15 23:17 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 23:03 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 08:01 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-16 08:46 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 17:54 +0100
-- I Don't Understand Much Mathematics Either But I Did on 1 June 2003 Have This Momentary Whimsical Inspiration dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-17 03:25 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 07:58 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 00:36 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-17 00:25 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:54 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 08:49 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 07:00 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:41 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 00:23 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 20:32 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:57 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:55 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:38 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:28 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 10:23 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:17 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-18 14:12 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 16:30 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 13:55 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-31 17:09 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 15:19 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-08-01 11:36 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-08-01 20:44 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 14:02 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-08-01 22:09 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-02 06:09 +0200
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:20 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:34 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:25 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-07-19 09:59 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-21 15:59 +0200
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:30 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 16:14 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 08:54 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 10:45 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:09 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:58 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 13:29 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 14:57 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 15:18 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:57 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:08 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:05 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:55 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:48 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 17:53 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:16 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:49 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:04 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:10 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:16 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:31 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 18:38 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 20:01 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-19 19:11 -0700
Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-20 22:48 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-21 07:45 +0100
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:23 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-21 20:30 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 23:45 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 08:53 +0100
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:24 +1000
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:33 +1000
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-21 11:57 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:41 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:57 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-07-19 19:27 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:06 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:36 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:56 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:45 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-20 06:38 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 17:21 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:10 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:14 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:05 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:09 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:24 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:41 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:48 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:11 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:04 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 20:08 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:12 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:17 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:56 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-17 23:34 +0200
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:07 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 21:07 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-15 18:26 -0400
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 17:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60370 |
In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >@btinternet.com says... > > >> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >@btinternet.com says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, DoW #2" >> >> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says... >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just >> >> >> >>how he does >> >> >> >> it that you object to? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a >> >> >> >>"breath of >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the >> >> >> >>awards from >> >> >> >> happening now are you? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >> >> > >> >> >> >> Some KooKs think differently. >> > >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't >> >see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. >> > >> >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right. >> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is >> just because you say I can't. > >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the >rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely >legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you >an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would >buy that either. > Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f800634af1213098daae@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60376 |
In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... > > In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >@btinternet.com says... > > > > > >> > >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >> >@btinternet.com says... > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, DoW #2" > >> >> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes > >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, > >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes > >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says... > >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore > >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote > >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just > >> >> >> >>how he does > >> >> >> >> it that you object to? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a > >> >> >> >>"breath of > >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the > >> >> >> >>awards from > >> >> >> >> happening now are you? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Some KooKs think differently. > >> > > >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't > >> >see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. > >> > > >> > >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right. > >> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is > >> just because you say I can't. > > > >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the > >rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely > >legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you > >an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would > >buy that either. > > > > Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide for > ourselves exactly how much it "counts". And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from someone "she" considers a ko0k. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 22:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60377 |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > @btinternet.com says... > > > >> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >@btinternet.com says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, >> >> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >> >@btinternet.com says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, >> >> >> DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> In message >> >> >> >> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, Skeet >> >> >> >> DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, >> >> >> >> >willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several >> >> >> >> >> >kook >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote >> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just >> >> >> >> >>how he does >> >> >> >> >> it that you object to? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being >> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> >>"breath of >> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the >> >> >> >> >>awards from >> >> >> >> >> happening now are you? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Some KooKs think differently. >> >> > >> >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I >> >> >don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic >> >> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider >> >> seriously is just because you say I can't. >> > >> >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because >> >the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything >> >remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and >> >guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, >> >but nobody would buy that either. >> > >> > >> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide >> for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > someone "she" considers a ko0k. MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 17:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60411 |
In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > > @btinternet.com says... > > > > > > > >> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >> >@btinternet.com says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, > >> >> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >> >> >@btinternet.com says... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, > >> >> >> DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes > >> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> In message > >> >> >> >> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, Skeet > >> >> >> >> DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes > >> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, > >> >> >> >> >willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... > >> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several > >> >> >> >> >> >kook > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore > >> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote > >> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just > >> >> >> >> >>how he does > >> >> >> >> >> it that you object to? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being > >> >> >> >> >> a > >> >> >> >> >>"breath of > >> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the > >> >> >> >> >>awards from > >> >> >> >> >> happening now are you? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Some KooKs think differently. > >> >> > > >> >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I > >> >> >don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic > >> >> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider > >> >> seriously is just because you say I can't. > >> > > >> >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because > >> >the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything > >> >remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and > >> >guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, > >> >but nobody would buy that either. > >> > > >> > > >> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide > >> for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". > > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 18:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f86f6d9cd1a91d9896ab@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #60418 |
In article <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com>, Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > > Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? > I miss Janithor, I don't know who to be mad at.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 17:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f862d6eccf5efe98dac2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60419 |
In article <MPG.31f86f6d9cd1a91d9896ab@news.eternal-september.org>, Skidaddle@chote.com says... > > In article <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com>, > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > > > > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > > > > Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? > > > > I miss Janithor, I don't know who to be mad at. He's copying % and playing dead. What a copycat! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 18:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f8743de05018499896ac@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #60420 |
In article <MPG.31f862d6eccf5efe98dac2@news.altopia.com>, Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > In article <MPG.31f86f6d9cd1a91d9896ab@news.eternal-september.org>, > Skidaddle@chote.com says... > > > > > > In article <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com>, > > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > > > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > > > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > > > > > > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > > > > > > Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? > > > > > > > I miss Janithor, I don't know who to be mad at. > > He's copying % and playing dead. What a copycat! Do you think the awards should come back? Will you be my friend?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 18:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f875edab78506698dac4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60422 |
In article <MPG.31f8743de05018499896ac@news.eternal-september.org>, Skidaddle@chote.com says... > > In article <MPG.31f862d6eccf5efe98dac2@news.altopia.com>, > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > > In article <MPG.31f86f6d9cd1a91d9896ab@news.eternal-september.org>, > > Skidaddle@chote.com says... > > > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com>, > > > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > > > > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > > > > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > > > > > > > > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > > > > > > > > Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? > > > > > > > > > > I miss Janithor, I don't know who to be mad at. > > > > He's copying % and playing dead. What a copycat! > > Do you think the awards should come back? Will you be my friend? I miss Emmett... -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 20:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f88951ee074bdd9896ad@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #60423 |
In article <MPG.31f875edab78506698dac4@news.altopia.com>, Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > In article <MPG.31f8743de05018499896ac@news.eternal-september.org>, > Skidaddle@chote.com says... > > > > > > In article <MPG.31f862d6eccf5efe98dac2@news.altopia.com>, > > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > > > > In article <MPG.31f86f6d9cd1a91d9896ab@news.eternal-september.org>, > > > Skidaddle@chote.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com>, > > > > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... > > > > > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > > > > > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > > > > > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > > > > > > > > > > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > > > > > > > > > > Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I miss Janithor, I don't know who to be mad at. > > > > > > He's copying % and playing dead. What a copycat! > > > > Do you think the awards should come back? Will you be my friend? > > I miss Emmett... He had such wit and humor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 19:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nmmmku$eet$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #60426 |
x-no-archive: yes On 7/19/2016 7:01 PM, Skeet DoW # 420 wrote: > In article <MPG.31f875edab78506698dac4@news.altopia.com>, > Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... >> >> In article <MPG.31f8743de05018499896ac@news.eternal-september.org>, >> Skidaddle@chote.com says... >> >> >>> >>> In article <MPG.31f862d6eccf5efe98dac2@news.altopia.com>, >>> Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... >>>> >>>> In article <MPG.31f86f6d9cd1a91d9896ab@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>> Skidaddle@chote.com says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> In article <MPG.31f85ffaad6e969198dabd@news.altopia.com>, >>>>> Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge says... >>>>>>>> And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look >>>>>>>> even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from >>>>>>>> someone "she" considers a ko0k. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? >>>>>> >>>>>> Even easier: Do you consider Jillians a ko0k, ko0k? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I miss Janithor, I don't know who to be mad at. >>>> >>>> He's copying % and playing dead. What a copycat! >>> >>> Do you think the awards should come back? Will you be my friend? >> >> I miss Emmett... > > He had such wit and humor. Emmett rules. The R videos were genius. Right up with there with Monty Python's Holy Grail, people will be still quoting them years from now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 22:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31fa01eeacecda98dad2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60411 |
In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > > @btinternet.com says... > > > > > > > >> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >> >@btinternet.com says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, > >> >> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >> >> >@btinternet.com says... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, > >> >> >> DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes > >> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> In message > >> >> >> >> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, Skeet > >> >> >> >> DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes > >> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, > >> >> >> >> >willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... > >> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several > >> >> >> >> >> >kook > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore > >> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote > >> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just > >> >> >> >> >>how he does > >> >> >> >> >> it that you object to? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being > >> >> >> >> >> a > >> >> >> >> >>"breath of > >> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the > >> >> >> >> >>awards from > >> >> >> >> >> happening now are you? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Some KooKs think differently. > >> >> > > >> >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I > >> >> >don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic > >> >> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider > >> >> seriously is just because you say I can't. > >> > > >> >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because > >> >the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything > >> >remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and > >> >guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, > >> >but nobody would buy that either. > >> > > >> > > >> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide > >> for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". > > > > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look > > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from > > someone "she" considers a ko0k. > > MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his one and only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards because it's all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks voting like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out of this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially watching... -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 07:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <4dzN7LEU+GkXFwhD@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60484 |
In message <MPG.31fa01eeacecda98dad2@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >says... > > >> >> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> >> > In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> > @btinternet.com says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >> >@btinternet.com says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, >> >> >> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, "Sn!pe, >> >> >> >> DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >> >> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> In message >> >> >> >> >> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, Skeet >> >> >> >> >> DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >> >> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, >> >> >> >> >> >willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several >> >> >> >> >> >> >kook >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >> >> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote >> >> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just >> >> >> >> >> >>how he does >> >> >> >> >> >> it that you object to? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being >> >> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> >> >>"breath of >> >> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the >> >> >> >> >> >>awards from >> >> >> >> >> >> happening now are you? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Some KooKs think differently. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I >> >> >> >don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic >> >> >> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider >> >> >> seriously is just because you say I can't. >> >> > >> >> >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because >> >> >the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything >> >> >remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and >> >> >guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, >> >> >but nobody would buy that either. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide >> >> for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". >> > >> > And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look >> > even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from >> > someone "she" considers a ko0k. >> >> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > >Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his one and >only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards because it's >all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks voting >like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out of >this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially >watching... > There is also Ellis Dee. And if Mr. Smartypants is nominated I think I can promise more votes. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 19:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <9iolkp.8ls.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #60485 |
Bill Jillians wrote: > In message <MPG.31fa01eeacecda98dad2@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >> >> >>> >>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>> >>>> In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >>>> @btinternet.com says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, >>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>>>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >>>>>> @btinternet.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, >>>>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>>>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, >>>>>>>>> "Sn!pe, DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >>>>>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In message >>>>>>>>>>> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kook >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just >>>>>>>>>>>>> how he does >>>>>>>>>>>>> it that you object to? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>> "breath of >>>>>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the >>>>>>>>>>>>> awards from >>>>>>>>>>>>> happening now are you? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some KooKs think differently. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I >>>>>>>> don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic >>>>>>> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider >>>>>>> seriously is just because you say I can't. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," >>>>>> because the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as >>>>>> anything remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New >>>>>> Son of God and guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and >>>>>> other bitchin stuff, but nobody would buy that either. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will >>>>> decide for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". >>>> >>>> And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads >>>> look even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only >>>> "vote" from someone "she" considers a ko0k. >>> >>> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? >> >> Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his one >> and only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards >> because it's >> all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks >> voting >> like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out >> of >> this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially >> watching... >> > > There is also Ellis Dee. > > And if Mr. Smartypants is nominated I think I can promise more votes. i can certainly promise more vetos
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 20:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31fb332d111bcc2f98daea@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60523 |
In article <9iolkp.8ls.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Bill Jillians wrote: > > In message <MPG.31fa01eeacecda98dad2@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > > DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >> In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >> says... > >> > >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >>> > >>>> In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >>>> @btinternet.com says... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, > >>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >>>>>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 > >>>>>> @btinternet.com says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, > >>>>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >>>>>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, > >>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, > >>>>>>>>> "Sn!pe, DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes > >>>>>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In message > >>>>>>>>>>> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, > >>>>>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes > >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, > >>>>>>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kook > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just > >>>>>>>>>>>>> how he does > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it that you object to? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "breath of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> awards from > >>>>>>>>>>>>> happening now are you? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Some KooKs think differently. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I > >>>>>>>> don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic > >>>>>>> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider > >>>>>>> seriously is just because you say I can't. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," > >>>>>> because the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as > >>>>>> anything remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New > >>>>>> Son of God and guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and > >>>>>> other bitchin stuff, but nobody would buy that either. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will > >>>>> decide for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". > >>>> > >>>> And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads > >>>> look even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only > >>>> "vote" from someone "she" considers a ko0k. > >>> > >>> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > >> > >> Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his one > >> and only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards > >> because it's > >> all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks > >> voting > >> like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out > >> of > >> this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially > >> watching... > >> > > > > There is also Ellis Dee. > > > > And if Mr. Smartypants is nominated I think I can promise more votes. > > i can certainly promise more vetos You can turn those "votes" into "vetos". -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 23:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <9ip4v9.qu0.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #60524 |
Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <9iolkp.8ls.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > >> >> Bill Jillians wrote: >>> In message <MPG.31fa01eeacecda98dad2@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>> In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >>>>>> @btinternet.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, >>>>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>>>>>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, >>>>>>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>>>>>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> "Sn!pe, DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >>>>>>>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In message >>>>>>>>>>>>> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several kook >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just how he does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it that you object to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "breath of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the awards from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening now are you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Some KooKs think differently. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any >>>>>>>>>> elections, I don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' >>>>>>>>>> stopped. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic >>>>>>>>> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should >>>>>>>>> consider seriously is just because you say I can't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," >>>>>>>> because the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes >>>>>>>> as anything remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the >>>>>>>> New Son of God and guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss >>>>>>>> and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would buy that either. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will >>>>>>> decide for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". >>>>>> >>>>>> And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads >>>>>> look even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only >>>>>> "vote" from someone "she" considers a ko0k. >>>>> >>>>> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? >>>> >>>> Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his >>>> one and only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards >>>> because it's >>>> all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks >>>> voting >>>> like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out >>>> of >>>> this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially >>>> watching... >>>> >>> >>> There is also Ellis Dee. >>> >>> And if Mr. Smartypants is nominated I think I can promise more >>> votes. >> >> i can certainly promise more vetos > > You can turn those "votes" into "vetos". i can promise more of either or
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 08:53 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <Jmnx1mEGEdkXFwUO@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60523 |
In message <9iolkp.8ls.19.1@news.alt.net>, % <persent@gmail.com> writes >Bill Jillians wrote: >> In message <MPG.31fa01eeacecda98dad2@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>> In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>> >>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:16:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >>>>> @btinternet.com says... >>>>> >>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, >>>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>>>>> In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >>>>>>> @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, >>>>>>>> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>>>>>>>> In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, >>>>>>>>>> "Sn!pe, DoW #2" <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >>>>>>>>>>> Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In message >>>>>>>>>>>> <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kook >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible to vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> how he does >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it that you object to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "breath of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> awards from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening now are you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Some KooKs think differently. >>>>>>>>> Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, >>>>>>>>>I >>>>>>>>> don't see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic >>>>>>>> right. For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider >>>>>>>> seriously is just because you say I can't. >>>>>>> Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," >>>>>>> because the rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as >>>>>>> anything remotely legitimate. I could declare myself the New >>>>>>> Son of God and guarantee you an eternal afterlife of bliss and >>>>>>> other bitchin stuff, but nobody would buy that either. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will >>>>>> decide for ourselves exactly how much it "counts". >>>>> And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads >>>>> look even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only >>>>> "vote" from someone "she" considers a ko0k. >>>> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? >>> Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his >>>one >>> and only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards >>> because it's all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban >>>on ko0ks >>> voting like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" >>>answer out >>> of this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially >>> watching... >>> >> There is also Ellis Dee. >> And if Mr. Smartypants is nominated I think I can promise more >>votes. > >i can certainly promise more vetos Nice to be talking to you again %. Wouldn't want to miss out on those vetoes. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 17:24 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <1N_jz.3052$E07.1698@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #60484 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >says... > // >> >> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > >Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his one and >only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards because it's >all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks voting >like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out of >this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially >watching... /cough errr... ummmm.. moigt I point out _nobody_ "calls" a k00k a k00k? The "title" comes from observation by many.. and under peer review. So it is a designation of status moreso than a neener neener. Oddly enough-- but hardly surprising -- k00ks use it as per a neener neener ad hoc. The "peer review" was an important step of the process and the one thing Burnore -- and Cannon before him -- phuckd up on. It was their klooless boorish bent that saw both Alex Bartolovich(sp?) and Steve Crook both awarded k00k status.. a huge mistake in my opinion and an abuse of the privilege of FNVW 0ffice :-< In a nutshell.. using "k00k" as an address is simply recognising the title held by the target. ...jes my two bits on it all :-) /opens the trash can /kicks tthe bin ... an ewe Jill... yeh you, the phukwit under the clown hat. "Ellis Dee" is a junior tr0llr... and still at "dummys and rattles" stage. As Checky rightly points out - Paul will grab any post in this storm,, problem he has in touting he is 'reviving' what has been universally canned is using righteous reasoning to do so. It was never the case k00ks voted,, it was never the case 'newbies' rolling in voted...so how is his righteous reasoning going to get around those two preconditions to entering into any quorum, k00k. I too am waiting the "right" answer :-------------------D -- fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n] *** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000 [Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows". *** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500 "The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 17:33 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <OU_jz.3054$E07.2675@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #60484 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <nmmapt$e19$102@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >says... > // >> >> MID of me calling Bill Jillians a kook, kook? > >Do you think Bill Jillians is a ko0k, Nads? Will you accept his one and >only vote in your feeble attempt to revive the ko0k awards because it's >all you've got, or will you uphold the traditional ban on ko0ks voting >like the REAL FNVWs did? Can you somehow pull a "right" answer out of >this dilemma? Remember, eight billion viewers are potentially >watching... /cough errr... ummmm.. moigt I point out _nobody_ "calls" a k00k a k00k? The "title" comes from observation by many.. and under peer review. So it is a designation of status moreso than a neener neener. Oddly enough-- but hardly surprising -- k00ks use it as per a neener neener ad hoc. The "peer review" was an important step of the process and the one thing Burnore -- and Cannon before him -- phuckd up on. It was their klooless boorish bent that saw both Alex Bartolovich(sp?) and Steve Crook both awarded k00k status.. a huge mistake in my opinion and an abuse of the privilege of FNVW 0ffice :-< In a nutshell.. using "k00k" as an address is simply recognising the title held by the target. ...jes my two bits on it all :-) /opens the trash can /kicks tthe bin ... an ewe Jill... yeh you, the phukwit under the clown hat. "Ellis Dee" is a junior tr0llr... and still at "dummys and rattles" stage. As Checky rightly points out - Paul will grab any post in this storm,, problem he has in touting he is 'reviving' what has been universally canned is using righteous reasoning to do so. It was never the case k00ks voted,, it was never the case 'newbies' rolling in voted...so how is his righteous reasoning going to get around those two preconditions to entering into any quorum, k00k. I too am waiting the "right" answer :-------------------D -- fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n] *** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000 [Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows". *** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500 "The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 11:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help |
| Message-ID | <95s1pb95eqlr2uemglrhppnfkck427i5m9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #60488 |
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:33:02 +1000, BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> wrote: <...> > >...jes my two bits on it all :-) <...> Hey, Phlatty, we don't need your two-bits twice. Smackdown! -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my learned opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 07:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <brOlmwC8zxjXFwPI@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60377 |
In message <MPG.31f800634af1213098daae@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >In article <DtMDHwK1rljXFwMw@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >@btinternet.com says... > > >> >> In message <MPG.31f7ed29f39b10b698daaa@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >In article <usXY3WKZPkjXFwZG@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >@btinternet.com says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f7cb36a033493798daa9@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >> >In article <+aU8KKFWohjXFwo9@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >> >@btinternet.com says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> In message <1mqmrmr.1o7spb1a37w22N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, >> >> >>"Sn!pe, DoW #2" >> >> >> <snipeco.2@gmail.com> writes >> >> >> >Jilblains <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> In message <MPG.31f3d3f5308f0d84989680@news.eternal-september.org>, >> >> >> >> Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> writes >> >> >> >> >In article <LXJhZRLl7fiXFwmQ@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >> >> >> >> >@btinternet.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore >> >> >> >> >> >ineligible to vote >> >> >> >> >> >so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just >> >> >> >> >>how he does >> >> >> >> >> it that you object to? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Checkie must be proud of that DOW he awarded you for being a >> >> >> >> >>"breath of >> >> >> >> >> fresh air" ... you certainly ain't gonna try and stop the >> >> >> >> >>awards from >> >> >> >> >> happening now are you? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >They have already been stopped. By Checky of course. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> They have been stopped if they stay stopped. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >They're stopped. HTH HAND HORSE >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Some KooKs think differently. >> >> > >> >> >Since ko0ks have never been allowed to vote in any elections, I don't >> >> >see anyone, so they look pretty fuckin' stopped. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Well if you are wrong I fully expect to exercise my democratic right. >> >> For a lot of reasons but one I think you should consider seriously is >> >> just because you say I can't. >> > >> >Oh, you certainly can... it's just that it doesn't "count," because the >> >rest of us don't accept Nadley's bogus ko0k votes as anything remotely >> >legitimate. I could declare myself the New Son of God and guarantee you >> >an eternal afterlife of bliss and other bitchin stuff, but nobody would >> >buy that either. >> > >> >> Well myself and anyone else that feels inclined to do it will decide for >> ourselves exactly how much it "counts". > >And I wouldn't dream of denying you that. It will just make Nads look >even more desperate if she has to accept her one-and-only "vote" from >someone "she" considers a ko0k. > I must say I'm not particularly bothered about that. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web