Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #59825 > unrolled thread

Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help

Started by"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
First post2016-07-13 19:28 -0700
Last post2016-07-15 18:26 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 129 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-13 19:28 -0700
    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-14 13:45 +1000
    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-14 23:12 +0000
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 19:19 -0400
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 00:00 +0000
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 18:24 -0600
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:46 -0700
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 20:49 -0400
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:37 -0700
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:36 -0700
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 17:33 -0600
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:38 -0700
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:21 +1000
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:35 -0700
      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:20 +1000
        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 14:17 -0700
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:28 +0000
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 15:28 -0700
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 22:47 +0000
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0600
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 16:53 -0700
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-15 23:17 -0600
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 23:03 -0700
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 08:01 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-16 08:46 -0600
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 17:54 +0100
                        -- I Don't Understand Much Mathematics Either But I Did on 1 June 2003 Have This Momentary Whimsical Inspiration dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-17 03:25 +1000
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 07:58 +0100
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 00:36 +0000
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-17 00:25 -0600
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:11 +0000
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:54 -0600
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-16 15:57 -0700
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 08:49 +1000
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 07:00 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:41 +0100
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 00:23 -0700
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 20:32 +1000
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:57 +0100
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:55 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:38 +0100
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:28 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 10:23 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:17 -0600
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-18 14:12 -0400
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 16:30 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 13:55 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-31 17:09 -0400
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 15:19 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-08-01 11:36 -0400
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-08-01 20:44 +0000
                              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 14:02 -0700
                                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-08-01 22:09 +0100
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0100
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-02 06:09 +0200
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:20 -0600
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:34 +0100
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:25 -0700
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-07-19 09:59 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-21 15:59 +0200
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:30 -0700
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 16:14 +0100
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 08:54 -0700
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 10:45 -0600
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:09 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:58 -0600
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 13:29 -0500
                              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 14:57 -0400
                                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:07 -0700
                                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 15:18 -0500
                                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:22 -0700
                                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:57 -0400
                                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:08 -0500
                                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:05 -0500
                                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:55 -0400
                                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:06 -0500
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:48 +0000
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 17:53 +0100
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:16 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:49 +0000
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:04 -0700
                              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:10 -0600
                                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:16 -0700
                                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:31 -0600
                                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 18:38 -0700
                                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 20:01 -0600
                                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-19 19:11 -0700
                            Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-20 22:48 -0700
                              Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-21 07:45 +0100
                                Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:23 -0700
                                  Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-21 20:30 -0700
                                    Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 23:45 -0700
                                  Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 08:53 +0100
                              Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:24 +1000
                              Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:33 +1000
                                Re: Nad's Dilemma...  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-21 11:57 -0400
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:41 +0100
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:57 -0600
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-07-19 19:27 +0100
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:06 -0700
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:36 +0100
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:56 -0600
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:45 +0100
                          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-20 06:38 -0600
                            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 17:21 +0100
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:10 -0400
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:14 -0600
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0700
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:05 -0400
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:09 -0600
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:24 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:41 -0600
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:48 -0400
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:11 -0600
              Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:04 -0700
                Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 20:08 -0400
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:12 -0700
                    Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:17 -0600
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:56 -0700
                        Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
                      Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-17 23:34 +0200
                  Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:07 -0500
            Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 21:07 -0700
          Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-15 18:26 -0400

Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →


#59825 — Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-13 19:28 -0700
SubjectRe: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help
Message-ID<MPG.31f098a7e29f3eb498d9d6@news.altopia.com>
In article <nm6alk$5er$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700, Mr. Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme
> Fuckhead wrote:
> 
> > some make-believe award she dreamed up?
> 
> Au contraire, the Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, Coward of the 
> Month Award, and George Pickett Memorial Trophy all have long and storied 
> histories as AUK awards going back decades.

If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by 
extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us 
have known you under?

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#59829

FromBBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid>
Date2016-07-14 13:45 +1000
Message-ID<nVDhz.87$qC6.5@fx15.iad>
In reply to#59825
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>In article <nm6alk$5er$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
>says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700, Mr. Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme
>> Fuckhead wrote:
>> 
>> > some make-believe award she dreamed up?
>> 
>> Au contraire, the Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, Coward of the 
>> Month Award, and George Pickett Memorial Trophy all have long and storied 
>> histories as AUK awards going back decades.
>
>If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by 
>extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us 
>have known you under?

/chuckles

... this'll be good.... heh heh.

FWIW.. I have supplied one.. right here: <BSDhz.84$qC6.18@fx15.iad>


-- 
fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n]

*** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000
[Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows".
*** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500
"The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a 
decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59890

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-07-14 23:12 +0000
Message-ID<nm969i$5er$72@dont-email.me>
In reply to#59825
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <nm6alk$5er$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700, Mr. Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme
>> Fuckhead wrote:
>> 
>> > some make-believe award she dreamed up?
>> 
>> Au contraire, the Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, Coward of the
>> Month Award, and George Pickett Memorial Trophy all have long and
>> storied histories as AUK awards going back decades.
> 
> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us
> have known you under?

That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
core awards...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59891

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-07-14 19:19 -0400
Message-ID<9e7gob1q1c3beckaeb0kt4eoifirlmbip0@4ax.com>
In reply to#59890
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
>core awards...

The alpha and the omega! Such hubris!



-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59895

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-07-15 00:00 +0000
Message-ID<nm9927$5er$85@dont-email.me>
In reply to#59891
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:19:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've
>>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the
>>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original
>>core awards...
> 
> The alpha and the omega! Such hubris!

Are ... are you implying that you think I'll be the death of the awards? 
I hope there is a long and fruitful line of succession after me. Hmm. 
Perhaps when kensi and I abdicate we should name Bill Jillians as FNVW. I 
can think of several kooks that would froth themselves half to death if 
*that* happened.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59901

FromSkeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid>
Date2016-07-14 18:24 -0600
Message-ID<l8bgobpmtppdhcrqpodi8nfa1nv9mg505i@4ax.com>
In reply to#59895
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:19:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've
>>>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the
>>>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original
>>>core awards...
>> 
>> The alpha and the omega! Such hubris!
>
>Are ... are you implying that you think I'll be the death of the awards? 

Um..What awards?

>I hope there is a long and fruitful line of succession after me. Hmm. 
>Perhaps when kensi and I abdicate we should name Bill Jillians as FNVW. I 
>can think of several kooks that would froth themselves half to death if 
>*that* happened.
>
><snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59913

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-14 17:46 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f1d22ea75aab1398da03@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#59901
In article <l8bgobpmtppdhcrqpodi8nfa1nv9mg505i@4ax.com>, 
Skeet@notinvalid.invalid says...


> Subject: Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help
> From: Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid>
> Newsgroups: alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks
> 
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:19:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >>>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've
> >>>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the
> >>>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original
> >>>core awards...
> >> 
> >> The alpha and the omega! Such hubris!
> >
> >Are ... are you implying that you think I'll be the death of the awards? 
> 
> Um..What awards?
> 

I know... LOL!

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59914

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-07-14 20:49 -0400
Message-ID<mmcgobpq364gqeisrajn5dc3vsrrdve0to@4ax.com>
In reply to#59913
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:46:13 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>In article <l8bgobpmtppdhcrqpodi8nfa1nv9mg505i@4ax.com>, 
>Skeet@notinvalid.invalid says...
>>
>> Um, do you know you'r a flaming faggot?
>
>I know... LOL!

Wow, one small step for Checkmate, one giant leap for faggotry!


-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59908

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-14 17:37 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f1d0177cb1da8598d9fe@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#59895
In article <nm9927$5er$85@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...


> Are ... are you implying that you think I'll be the death of the awards? 
> 

LOL!  *I* was the death of the awards, you goof.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59907

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-14 17:36 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f1cfd2f13b309998d9fd@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#59891
In article <9e7gob1q1c3beckaeb0kt4eoifirlmbip0@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
> >dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
> >very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
> >core awards...
> 
> The alpha and the omega! Such hubris!

Sounds more like bullshit to me.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59892

FromSkeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid>
Date2016-07-14 17:33 -0600
Message-ID<e98gobpgb16oqrbnqbrjbufaraq09tre3h@4ax.com>
In reply to#59890
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>
>> In article <nm6alk$5er$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700, Mr. Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme
>>> Fuckhead wrote:
>>> 
>>> > some make-believe award she dreamed up?
>>> 
>>> Au contraire, the Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, Coward of the
>>> Month Award, and George Pickett Memorial Trophy all have long and
>>> storied histories as AUK awards going back decades.
>> 
>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
>> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us
>> have known you under?
>
>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
>core awards...


Translation: You got me in a corner.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59909

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-14 17:38 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f1d0485260c40e98d9ff@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#59892
In article <e98gobpgb16oqrbnqbrjbufaraq09tre3h@4ax.com>, 
Skeet@notinvalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> >
> >> In article <nm6alk$5er$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >> says...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700, Mr. Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme
> >>> Fuckhead wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> > some make-believe award she dreamed up?
> >>> 
> >>> Au contraire, the Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, Coward of the
> >>> Month Award, and George Pickett Memorial Trophy all have long and
> >>> storied histories as AUK awards going back decades.
> >> 
> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
> >> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us
> >> have known you under?
> >
> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
> >dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
> >very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
> >core awards...
> 
> 
> Translation: You got me in a corner.

Yup.  Exactly what I expected.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59933

FromBBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid>
Date2016-07-15 21:21 +1000
Message-ID<3H3iz.3212$Pz4.2214@fx03.iad>
In reply to#59892
Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC), Durrbs
><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
//
>>
>>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
>>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
>>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
>>core awards...
>
>
>Translation: You got me in a corner.

more like ... bent over gweggle's imagined bow rail and spewing :---D


-- 
fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n]

*** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000
[Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows".
*** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500
"The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a 
decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59906

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-14 17:35 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f1cfad2701dd4f98d9fc@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#59890
In article <nm969i$5er$72@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> 
> > In article <nm6alk$5er$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700, Mr. Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme
> >> Fuckhead wrote:
> >> 
> >> > some make-believe award she dreamed up?
> >> 
> >> Au contraire, the Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, Coward of the
> >> Month Award, and George Pickett Memorial Trophy all have long and
> >> storied histories as AUK awards going back decades.
> > 
> > If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
> > extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us
> > have known you under?
> 
> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
> dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
> very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
> core awards...

Oh, there's definitely a need-to-know... for all of us, if you expect to 
get the credibility you seem to think you're entitled to.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59932

FromBBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid>
Date2016-07-15 21:20 +1000
Message-ID<9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>
In reply to#59890
Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>
//
>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
>> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us
>> have known you under?
>
>That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
>dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
>very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
>core awards...

..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK 
when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand :->

for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix also made
these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. Anyone who was
around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter)
'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as
recently pointed to it was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was
dragged into AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/

soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D


-- 
fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n]

*** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000
[Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows".
*** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN
  http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500
"The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a 
decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60012

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-15 14:17 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f2f2d33673d77998da18@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#59932
In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid 
says...


> 
> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> >
> //
> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
> >> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any of us
> >> have known you under?
> >
> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. I've 
> >dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there at the 
> >very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the original 
> >core awards...
> 
> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK 
> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand :->
> 
> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix also made
> these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. Anyone who was
> around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter)
> 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as
> recently pointed to it was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was
> dragged into AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/
> 
> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D

Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was 
driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting 
up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to 
be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.  
When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to 
resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's 
why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also 
why S/H/IT is failing so badly.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60017

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-07-15 21:28 +0000
Message-ID<nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>
In reply to#60012
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid
> says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>> >
>> //
>> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
>> >> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any
>> >> of us have known you under?
>> >
>> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess.
>> >I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there
>> >at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the
>> >original core awards...
>> 
>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK when
>> both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand :->
>> 
>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix also
>> made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. Anyone
>> who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" nor that
>> faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even present in AUK..
>> in fact as recently pointed to it was during the reign of Bob Larter
>> that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/
>> 
>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D
> 
> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
> driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting
> up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to
> be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.
> When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to
> resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's
> why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also
> why S/H/IT is failing so badly.

For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* panties 
in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite spectacularly, 
particularly dolf and murphy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60023

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-07-15 15:28 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.31f303779788156a98da1c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#60017
In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> 
> > In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid
> > says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> >> >
> >> //
> >> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and by
> >> >> extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might any
> >> >> of us have known you under?
> >> >
> >> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess.
> >> >I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was there
> >> >at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with one of the
> >> >original core awards...
> >> 
> >> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK when
> >> both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand :->
> >> 
> >> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix also
> >> made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. Anyone
> >> who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" nor that
> >> faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even present in AUK..
> >> in fact as recently pointed to it was during the reign of Bob Larter
> >> that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/
> >> 
> >> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D
> > 
> > Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
> > driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to setting
> > up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was supposed to
> > be impressed with someone who only alluded to some unproven credentials.
> > When I pressed for something a little more substantial, Nads had to
> > resort to mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it.  That's
> > why none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also
> > why S/H/IT is failing so badly.
> 
> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* panties 
> in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite spectacularly, 
> particularly dolf and murphy.

I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, 
party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.  Tell me how that 
shows anything BUT failure?

Still waiting for your bonafides, although I think it's quite clear from 
everyone else here, that there's no support for another FNVW, 
regardless.  Of course, that doesn't mean that you can't continue to 
have your little pretend "tea party" with your imaginary friends.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60026

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-07-15 22:47 +0000
Message-ID<nmbp6g$e19$25@dont-email.me>
In reply to#60023
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid
>> > says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> //
>> >> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and
>> >> >> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might
>> >> >> any of us have known you under?
>> >> >
>> >> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess.
>> >> >I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was
>> >> >there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with
>> >> >one of the original core awards...
>> >> 
>> >> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK
>> >> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand
>> >> :->
>> >> 
>> >> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix
>> >> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric.
>> >> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien"
>> >> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even
>> >> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the
>> >> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth"..
>> >> if you like :-/
>> >> 
>> >> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D
>> > 
>> > Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
>> > driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to
>> > setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was
>> > supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some
>> > unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more
>> > substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if
>> > anybody's buying any of it.  That's why none of this bullshit is
>> > flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so
>> > badly.
>> 
>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your*
>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite
>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy.
> 
> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW,
> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.

Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes 
four.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60036

FromSkeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid>
Date2016-07-15 17:08 -0600
Message-ID<c6riob9f0up25e4h58poi6lnk87nrpsoc3@4ax.com>
In reply to#60026
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 22:47:44 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>
>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>> 
>>> > In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid
>>> > says...
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> >> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> //
>>> >> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and
>>> >> >> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might
>>> >> >> any of us have known you under?
>>> >> >
>>> >> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess.
>>> >> >I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was
>>> >> >there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with
>>> >> >one of the original core awards...
>>> >> 
>>> >> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK
>>> >> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand
>>> >> :->
>>> >> 
>>> >> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix
>>> >> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric.
>>> >> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien"
>>> >> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even
>>> >> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the
>>> >> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth"..
>>> >> if you like :-/
>>> >> 
>>> >> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D
>>> > 
>>> > Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was
>>> > driving up Nad's ass.  Nads came in here and immediately went to
>>> > setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was
>>> > supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some
>>> > unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more
>>> > substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if
>>> > anybody's buying any of it.  That's why none of this bullshit is
>>> > flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so
>>> > badly.
>>> 
>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your*
>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite
>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy.
>> 
>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW,
>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one.
>
>Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes 
>four.
>
><snicker>

And yer all kookie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web