Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #281093 > unrolled thread

protect-earth-from-asteroids

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-12 08:47 -0800
    Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-01-12 11:44 -0600
    Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-12 14:09 -0800
    Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 11:12 -0800
    Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-14 11:06 +1100
      Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 19:19 -0500
      Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-14 00:22 +0000
      Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 20:36 -0500
        Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 23:05 -0800
          Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 12:04 -0800
        Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-01-14 04:59 -0700
        Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-14 11:55 -0800
          Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2016-01-14 15:15 -0600
            Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-14 14:05 -0800
              Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-01-14 16:56 -0700
                Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-01-14 19:25 -0600
                  Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-01-15 10:31 -0700
                Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-01-15 10:39 -0700
              Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2016-01-14 19:27 -0600
                Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-14 18:17 -0800
                  Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-14 22:14 -0800
              Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-15 22:45 -0800
                Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-01-16 07:48 -0700
            Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 20:35 -0800
          Re: protect-earth-from-asteroids Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-01-15 14:16 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#281093 — protect-earth-from-asteroids

Goal of new NASA office: Protect Earth from asteroids
http://www.cnet.com/news/goal-of-new-nasa-office-protect-earth-from-asteroids/


NASA is getting into the 'protection racket'.


NASA is going to knock
on your door
and sell you 
protection insurance.

You'll say, "Protection from what??"

They'll say, 

"We are selling you insurance
to protect you from Asteroids
from killing you!"

Or, as Al Capone would say..

"You're buying protection from US!!!"



The Starmaker


NASA are just a bunch of fuckin...gangsters.


I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#281094

On 1/12/2016 10:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Goal of new NASA office: Protect Earth from asteroids
> http://www.cnet.com/news/goal-of-new-nasa-office-protect-earth-from-asteroids/
>
>
> NASA is getting into the 'protection racket'.
>
>
> NASA is going to knock
> on your door
> and sell you
> protection insurance.
>
> You'll say, "Protection from what??"
>
> They'll say,
>
> "We are selling you insurance
> to protect you from Asteroids
> from killing you!"
>
> Or, as Al Capone would say..
>
> "You're buying protection from US!!!"
>
>
>
> The Starmaker
>
>
> NASA are just a bunch of fuckin...gangsters.
>
>
> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>
I'd call you an idiot.... but that category is full here.

dumb fuck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281097

On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 8:47:23 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> Goal of new NASA office: Protect Earth from asteroids


wrong goal was to import Islam, they failed , try again, so we can get real Moslems to chop your filthy greedy libtard head cut off, OK< Fagog? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281131

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Goal of new NASA office: Protect Earth from asteroids
> http://www.cnet.com/news/goal-of-new-nasa-office-protect-earth-from-asteroids/
> 
> NASA is getting into the 'protection racket'.
> 
> NASA is going to knock
> on your door
> and sell you
> protection insurance.
> 
> You'll say, "Protection from what??"
> 
> They'll say,
> 
> "We are selling you insurance
> to protect you from Asteroids
> from killing you!"
> 
> Or, as Al Capone would say..
> 
> "You're buying protection from US!!!"
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> NASA are just a bunch of fuckin...gangsters.
> 
> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.


How do you like this new title NASA conjured up?


Planetary Defense Officer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2016/01/13/how-nasas-planetary-defense-officer-will-protect-earth-from-asteroids/



Al Capone has to be laughing right now....



How much does a Planetary Defense Officer make and what exactly does he
do all day?


probably runs if he sees a comet coming towards him?

This will be a great headline: Planetary Defense Officer Gets Killed By
Killer Asteroid

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281141

On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>

It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by 
large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating - 
wiped out the dinosaurs, and a good many other life forms, for example.

Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A 
meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.

So it's not unreasonable to seek to prevent such disasters if possible.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281143

On 01/13/2016 07:06 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>>
>
> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
> wiped out the dinosaurs, and a good many other life forms, for example.
>
> Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A
> meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.
>
> So it's not unreasonable to seek to prevent such disasters if possible.
>
> Sylvia.

I'm pretty sure, "Sylvia" that a nice stiff energy tax on the order of 
maybe a trillion dollars a year would probably be pretty good protection 
from any such disaster. I think the scientific consensus agrees with me.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281144

[aieo-enforced trimming]
In sci.physics Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by 
> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating - 
> wiped out the dinosaurs, and a good many other life forms, for example.
> Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A 
> meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.
> So it's not unreasonable to seek to prevent such disasters if possible.
> Sylvia.

Given the relative expected death and infrastructure damage from 
terrorism v asteroid strikes it works out a reasonable US budget for 
asteroid avoidance is around $160 mn per year.

-- 
The History of the Climate Wars 
[condensed for use in appellate courts and by children grades 3-5].
<https://andthentheresphysics.files.wordpress.com/
2015/02/1000years.jpg?w=640&h=870>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281145

In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>, 
sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
> 
> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> >
> 
> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by 
> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating - 
> wiped out the dinosaurs, and a good many other life forms, for example.
> 
> Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A 
> meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.

It could do worse than that.  
Take a look at 51° 19.744' N  68° 41.193' W in Google Earth.  That 
feature, roughly 60 miles in diameter, is a 200 million year old meteor 
crater.

Imagine if that hit, say, Hartford.  Hartford goes, and Springfield, and 
New Haven, and while they aren't actually going to be inside the crater, 
New York and Boston are both going to pretty much cease to exist, and 
most of the east coast is going to be in much the same condition as it 
might be after a nuclear attack, minus the radiation.

And it gets worse--there's reason to believe that it was a multiple 
impact with addtional strikes in France, Ukraine, North Dakota, and 
Manitoba.
 
> So it's not unreasonable to seek to prevent such disasters if 
possible.
> 
> Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281150

J. Clarke wrote:
> 
> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
> >
> > On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> > >
> >
> > It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
> > large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
> > wiped out the dinosaurs, and a good many other life forms, for example.
> >
> > Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A
> > meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.
> 
> It could do worse than that.
> Take a look at 51° 19.744' N  68° 41.193' W in Google Earth.  That
> feature, roughly 60 miles in diameter, is a 200 million year old meteor
> crater.
> 
> Imagine if that hit, say, Hartford.  Hartford goes, and Springfield, and
> New Haven, and while they aren't actually going to be inside the crater,
> New York and Boston are both going to pretty much cease to exist, and
> most of the east coast is going to be in much the same condition as it
> might be after a nuclear attack, minus the radiation.
> 
> And it gets worse--there's reason to believe that it was a multiple
> impact with addtional strikes in France, Ukraine, North Dakota, and
> Manitoba.
> 
> > So it's not unreasonable to seek to prevent such disasters if
> possible.
> >
> > Sylvia.


Learn to build an Asteroid and kill all the Russians.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281165

On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 11:04:22 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> J. Clarke wrote:
> > 
> > In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
> > sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
> > >
> > > On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
> > > large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
> > > wiped out the dinosaurs, and a good many other life forms, for example.
> > >
> > > Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A
> > > meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.
> > 
> > It could do worse than that.
> > Take a look at 51° 19.744' N  68° 41.193' W in Google Earth.  That
> > feature, roughly 60 miles in diameter, is a 200 million year old meteor
> > crater.
> > 
> > Imagine if that hit, say, Hartford.  Hartford goes, and Springfield, and
> > New Haven, and while they aren't actually going to be inside the crater,
> > New York and Boston are both going to pretty much cease to exist, and
> > most of the east coast is going to be in much the same condition as it
> > might be after a nuclear attack, minus the radiation.
> > 
> > And it gets worse--there's reason to believe that it was a multiple
> > impact with addtional strikes in France, Ukraine, North Dakota, and
> > Manitoba.
> > 
> > > So it's not unreasonable to seek to prevent such disasters if
> > possible.
> > >
> > > Sylvia.
> 
> 
> Learn to build an Asteroid and kill all the Russians.

Fucking white bigot NIgger

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281151

"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Lesser impacts have caused widespread, if not actually global, damage. A 
>> meteor could easily take out an entire city, killing millions of people.
>
>It could do worse than that.  
>Take a look at 51° 19.744' N  68° 41.193' W in Google Earth.  That 
>feature, roughly 60 miles in diameter, is a 200 million year old meteor 
>crater.
>
>Imagine if that hit, say, Hartford.  Hartford goes, and Springfield, and 
>New Haven, and while they aren't actually going to be inside the crater, 
>New York and Boston are both going to pretty much cease to exist, and 
>most of the east coast is going to be in much the same condition as it 
>might be after a nuclear attack, minus the radiation.
>
>And it gets worse--there's reason to believe that it was a multiple 
>impact with addtional strikes in France, Ukraine, North Dakota, and 
>Manitoba.

Wikipedia says it's the SIXTH largest such crater, though it's the
largest easily visible one.  When I entered the co-ordinates into
google maps, I had to back out three times before the structure became
visible.

The Manicouagan wiki page says "It was once thought to be associated
with the end-Carnian extinction event."

but the Carnian page says "Its boundaries are not characterized by
major extinctions or biotic turnovers, "

So was there or was there not an extinction event at the end of the
Carnian, before we can assign it to the Manicouagan and friends
impacts.
-- 
We are geeks.  Resistance is voltage over current.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281163

J. Clarke wrote:
> 
> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
> >
> > On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> > >
> >
> > It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
> > large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
> > wiped out the dinosaurs, 


i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
girl dinosaurs.



There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
hand full.


How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281168

On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> J. Clarke wrote:
>>
>> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
>> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
>>>
>>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
>>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
>>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
>
>
> i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
> girl dinosaurs.
>
>
>
> There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
> hand full.
>
>
> How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
> enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.

20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.

Dude, you really need to up your game.

Lynn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281172

Lynn McGuire wrote:
> 
> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > J. Clarke wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
> >> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
> >>>
> >>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
> >>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
> >>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
> >
> >
> > i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
> > girl dinosaurs.
> >
> >
> >
> > There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
> > hand full.
> >
> >
> > How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
> > enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
> 
> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
> 
> Dude, you really need to up your game.
> 
> Lynn


I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
speculative parts. 


head to toe.


I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.

Just give me one name.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281173

WRONG AGAIN, FAKERSHIT!

HERE'S A NAME FOR YOU:  TYRANOSAURUS REX!

NOW GO KILL YOURSELF IDIOT!

YOU ARE A COMPLETE IMBECILE!

FUCK OFF!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:05:06 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Lynn McGuire wrote:
>> 
>> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > J. Clarke wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
>> >> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
>> >>>
>> >>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
>> >>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
>> >>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
>> >
>> >
>> > i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
>> > girl dinosaurs.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
>> > hand full.
>> >
>> >
>> > How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
>> > enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
>> 
>> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
>> 
>> Dude, you really need to up your game.
>> 
>> Lynn
>
>
>I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
>speculative parts. 
>
>
>head to toe.
>
>
>I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.
>
>Just give me one name.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281179

"Saul Levy"  wrote in message 
news:p8dg9blj5osf4q67bigdd2odsi0jtmsadj@4ax.com...

WRONG AGAIN, FAKERSHIT!

HERE'S A NAME FOR YOU:  TYRANOSAURUS REX!

NOW GO KILL YOURSELF IDIOT!

YOU ARE A COMPLETE IMBECILE!

FUCK OFF!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:05:06 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>
>> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > J. Clarke wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
>> >> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
>> >>>
>> >>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your 
>> >>>> money.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
>> >>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
>> >>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
>> >
>> >
>> > i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
>> > girl dinosaurs.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
>> > hand full.
>> >
>> >
>> > How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
>> > enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
>>
>> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of 
>> sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
>>
>> Dude, you really need to up your game.
>>
>> Lynn
>
>
>I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
>speculative parts.
>
>
>head to toe.
>
>
>I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.
>
>Just give me one name.

***************
Solly collects dicks.  A dinosaur dick is a great addition to his 
collection.  Actually, people send him bags of dicks all the time.  That way 
he can be tested to see if he is smarter than a bag of dicks.  So far, no. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281192

THIS IS WHY ALL TROLLS ARE MORONS!

GO FUCK A FLAG POLE, SHITFORBRAINS!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:25:08 -0600, "Notroll2016"
<notroll2015@charter.net> wrote:

>
>
>"Saul Levy"  wrote in message 
>news:p8dg9blj5osf4q67bigdd2odsi0jtmsadj@4ax.com...
>
>WRONG AGAIN, FAKERSHIT!
>
>HERE'S A NAME FOR YOU:  TYRANOSAURUS REX!
>
>NOW GO KILL YOURSELF IDIOT!
>
>YOU ARE A COMPLETE IMBECILE!
>
>FUCK OFF!
>
>Saul Levy
>
>
>On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:05:06 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > J. Clarke wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
>>> >> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your 
>>> >>>> money.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
>>> >>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
>>> >>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
>>> > girl dinosaurs.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
>>> > hand full.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
>>> > enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
>>>
>>> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of 
>>> sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
>>>
>>> Dude, you really need to up your game.
>>>
>>> Lynn
>>
>>
>>I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
>>speculative parts.
>>
>>
>>head to toe.
>>
>>
>>I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.
>>
>>Just give me one name.
>
>***************
>Solly collects dicks.  A dinosaur dick is a great addition to his 
>collection.  Actually, people send him bags of dicks all the time.  That way 
>he can be tested to see if he is smarter than a bag of dicks.  So far, no.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281194

YESTERDAY THE NEWS ANNOUNCED A TITANOSAUR!

I'VE HEARD TWO WEIGHTS FOR THE COMPLETE DINO:  70 AND 80 TONS!

TITANOSAUR IS SO BIG IT WON'T FIT IN ONE ROOM!

THERE ARE PLENTY MORE!

YOU REALLY ARE A OCMPLETE IDIOT, FAKERSHITHEAD!

NOW GO PLAY WITH YOUR MARBLES!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:56:14 -0700, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net>
wrote:

>WRONG AGAIN, FAKERSHIT!
>
>HERE'S A NAME FOR YOU:  TYRANOSAURUS REX!
>
>NOW GO KILL YOURSELF IDIOT!
>
>YOU ARE A COMPLETE IMBECILE!
>
>FUCK OFF!
>
>Saul Levy
>
>
>On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:05:06 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > J. Clarke wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
>>> >> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
>>> >>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
>>> >>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
>>> > girl dinosaurs.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
>>> > hand full.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
>>> > enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
>>> 
>>> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
>>> 
>>> Dude, you really need to up your game.
>>> 
>>> Lynn
>>
>>
>>I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
>>speculative parts. 
>>
>>
>>head to toe.
>>
>>
>>I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.
>>
>>Just give me one name.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281180

On 1/14/2016 4:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>
>> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> J. Clarke wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
>>>> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
>>>>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
>>>>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
>>>
>>>
>>> i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
>>> girl dinosaurs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
>>> hand full.
>>>
>>>
>>> How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
>>> enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
>>
>> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
>>
>> Dude, you really need to up your game.
>>
>> Lynn
>
>
> I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
> speculative parts.
>
>
> head to toe.
>
>
> I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.
>
> Just give me one name.

There is a 98% complete Saurophaganax in the Sam Noble Oklahoma museum of Natural Science.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saurophaganax

Lynn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281181

Lynn McGuire wrote:
> 
> On 1/14/2016 4:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Lynn McGuire wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/14/2016 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> J. Clarke wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In article <dfo74nFbjocU1@mid.individual.net>,
> >>>> sylvia@not.at.this.address says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 13/01/2016 3:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think they come up with a 'new' racket everyday to take your money.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's clear from the geological record that the Earth has been hit by
> >>>>> large objects in the past, and that the results can be devastating -
> >>>>> wiped out the dinosaurs,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> i already told you girls, what wiped out the dinosaurs was a lack of
> >>> girl dinosaurs.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There simply was not that many dinosaurs around in those days...just a
> >>> hand full.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How many whole dinosaur bones did they find on earth by today? not
> >>> enough to keep them around long...probably under 20.
> >>
> >> 20 sets of dinosaur bones here in southeast Texas alone.  Thousands of sets of dinosaurs bones across The Great State of Texas.
> >>
> >> Dude, you really need to up your game.
> >>
> >> Lynn
> >
> >
> > I'm talking about a whole complete set of a dinosaur. Not...a toe, or
> > speculative parts.
> >
> >
> > head to toe.
> >
> >
> > I'm talking about a big dinosaur, not a little two inch lizzard.
> >
> > Just give me one name.
> 
> There is a 98% complete Saurophaganax in the Sam Noble Oklahoma museum of Natural Science.
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saurophaganax
> 
> Lynn



wow, you found 'one' in Oklahoma, TX.!    


19 more to go....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web