Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.infosystems.www.misc > #275
| From | Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.infosystems.www.misc |
| Subject | Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) |
| Date | 2025-08-15 15:55 +0000 |
| Organization | Dbus-free station. |
| Message-ID | <zLQHx_9TelyXMExp@violet.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <87cybb4838.fsf@nightsong.com> <AdZti608eZMoyhay@violet.siamics.net> <10788vk$1g8ve$1@dont-email.me> <Mf78sQ4PEdT8GlJ_@violet.siamics.net> <107beiq$283kn$2@dont-email.me> |
>>>>> On 2025-08-11, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 08:15:07 +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote: >> I do not consider W3C to be a relevant authority when it comes >> to /interoperability,/ which is to say, having more than two >> independent implementations of a technology or stack. > Which is exactly how standards like those endorsed by W3C are created. > For example, this is the reason why the WebSQL standard failed to > pass: because all the browser makers were using the same underlying > DBMS engine (SQLite) for their implementations, which didn't meet > the threshold for truly "independent" implementations. I would've appreciated positive examples better, TBH. Anyway, a bit of digging revealed [1], so I guess I was wrong; thanks. 1> The current specification features are implemented across major 1> browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. [1] http://w3c.github.io/geolocation/reports/implementation.html On the one hand, now I'm curious how many other browser-related TRs they have that only mention the Big 3 above. On the other [2] http://w3.org/TR/encrypted-media-1/ : 2> This specification does not define a content protection or Digital 2> Rights Management system. Rather, it defines a common API that 2> may be used to discover, select and interact with such systems as 2> well as with simpler content encryption systems. Which is to say, they provide a way to arbitrarily restrict interoperability in an entirely standards-compliant and interoperable manner. 2> W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention to 2> the specification and to promote its widespread deployment. This 2> enhances the functionality and interoperability of the Web. I'm afraid at this point, I can't take their alleged focus on interoperability seriously. It'd be akin to admitting that a politician is honest as they only ever took a bribe once or twice.
Back to comp.infosystems.www.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
non-mainstream web (browsers) Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-09 14:05 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-09 19:53 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-10 08:15 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-11 00:47 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-15 15:55 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-11 23:00 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-08-13 10:21 +1000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-13 19:18 +0000
[OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-14 12:55 +0000
Re: [OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-15 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-15 21:25 +0000
Re: [OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-17 02:07 +0000
Re: [OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: [OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-19 21:02 +0000
Re: [OT] appreciating things old and old-fashioned Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-22 18:39 +0000
I complain! Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-17 22:55 +0000
non-mainstream web Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-15 15:05 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-16 21:42 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 07:12 +0000
(non-)mainstream web and its costs Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-09-13 19:00 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-09-13 19:17 +0000
non-mainstream web browsers Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-15 15:55 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web browsers Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-16 22:46 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web browsers Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-09-13 19:13 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web browsers Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-13 23:02 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-11 08:53 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-11 21:51 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-11 14:57 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-13 18:43 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 12:14 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-13 12:48 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-15 15:14 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 09:03 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-16 23:36 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 07:09 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:45 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-18 23:25 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 08:14 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-19 21:58 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 00:39 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-25 03:24 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) "B. Pym" <Nobody447095@here-nor-there.org> - 2025-08-24 14:42 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-08-24 19:41 +0200
csiph-web