Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #13615
| Date | 2016-01-05 12:42 +0000 |
|---|---|
| From | Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.misc |
| Subject | Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC |
| Message-ID | <mpro.o0hcml001z0f50hso.atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <55351dae0ddave@triffid.co.uk> <fe78d9b7-d055-4ade-aaff-dad23b46c19b@googlegroups.com> <553afea7ccdave@triffid.co.uk> <mpro.o09piv0003br90id4.atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> <9ef205a4-8627-4570-b45f-2882e02ed3c1@googlegroups.com> |
| Followup-To | comp.sys.acorn.advocacy |
| Organization | Soft Rock Software |
Followups directed to: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
jgh@mdfs.net wrote: > Vince M Hudd wrote: [using another location instead of C:\Program Files] > > s/MS requirement/improved security/ > C:\Apps still has 'world read'+'system read/write', Okay, so you've set the permissions more sensibly - I'd contend that most typical users wouldn't, however. (Does that not still cause VRPC/UAC issues, though? The reason the "new version" of VRPC defaults to installing the emulator somewhere else is to sidestep the issue, as has already been discussed.) > it's just set up to avoid Microsoft's enthusiasm for destroying the > concept of hierarchial data storage. This strikes me as a completely nonsensical reason. If you don't like the way things are arranged in Program Files, and you are capable of moving things to a folder called Apps, you are just as capable of rearranging them within Program Files. Changing the location of the top level directory doesn't change how things are placed within it - in either case, it is down to you and/or the installers for the programs. (A good one will allow you to override the defaults - and those defaults are defined by whoever is responsible for the software you are installing). It strikes me your choice is more a case of thumbing your nose at Microsoft "just because". (Nothing wrong with that, of course - I'd be a hypocrite to suggest otherwise.) > For instance, the preponderance, encouraged my MS, for most users to dump > *everything* in 'Desktop' In what way has Microsoft ever encouraged that? (Stupidly) making it a little too easy is a vastly different thing to encouraging it. > and *everything* in Start-> Programs. For as long as I've been using a Start Menu - i.e. since it first appeared - mine has had things arranged on it in a sensible hierarchy (and very little on the 'Desktop') - although since Windows 8, I've begrudgingly learned to live without it. As with installers having a default path within Program Files, they usually have a default path on the Start Menu. If a crap installer doesn't let you choose where the shortcut should appear, how is that MS's fault, given that the installer *could* very easily have been written to provide that choice? I've used plenty of installers over the years (obviously) and I've found some that are truly crap and don't offer you the choice[1], some that are crap but accidentally allow their defaults to be overwritten[2], and some well written ones that allow the tree to be navigated and new directories (submenus) to be created. [1] Let them install where they want, then move the Start Menu entries around; it allow[s|ed] drag and drop. [2] Knowing that the Start Menu is a directory tree helps here - so when the Start Menu location is a writable text field, you can type in the path you want, though sometimes for this to work might need any new folders to be created first. It varies. Of course, the closest match to the Start Menu on RISC OS is the Apps folder - which if you use it (unless you take extra steps and/or don't access it from its icon bar icon) offers a wonderful hierarchy of... every application in the one window. Feck me, I'm defending Microsoft! I feel dirty. Followups set. -- Vince M Hudd Soft Rock Software Don't forget to vote in the 2015 RISC OS Awards: www.riscosawards.co.uk/vote2015.html
Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Virtual Acorn and UAC Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2015-12-20 15:05 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 16:21 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-21 09:52 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-22 07:53 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-22 08:39 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-23 08:00 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC SG nws <nwsgrp@ntlworld.com> - 2015-12-20 16:19 +0100
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2015-12-21 13:34 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC SG nws <nwsgrp@ntlworld.com> - 2015-12-21 17:11 +0100
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2015-12-21 20:34 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2015-12-20 16:27 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 17:03 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2015-12-20 17:32 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 20:00 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 20:52 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC jgh@mdfs.net - 2015-12-31 18:32 -0800
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2016-01-01 06:51 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2016-01-01 09:40 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC jgh@mdfs.net - 2016-01-02 17:35 -0800
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2016-01-05 12:42 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2016-01-03 13:34 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-03 14:16 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2016-01-03 22:23 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC John <newsmcc@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-04 09:18 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2016-01-04 12:09 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Vince M Hudd <atdotcodotuk@dotcodotukat.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 18:27 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2015-12-20 19:58 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 20:26 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2015-12-20 21:04 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 21:53 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2015-12-20 22:04 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> - 2015-12-20 22:19 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2015-12-20 23:31 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2015-12-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC (very OT noe!) Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2015-12-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-21 22:25 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@brianhowlett.me.uk> - 2015-12-21 23:46 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2015-12-22 11:35 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Barry Gray <barrygray@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-12-23 11:05 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> - 2015-12-23 11:10 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Fred Bambrough <fred@[127.0.0.1]> - 2015-12-23 20:57 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Timothy Hartley <tgh@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2015-12-27 10:15 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Jim Lesurf <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> - 2015-12-27 13:11 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2015-12-27 14:44 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2015-12-27 19:45 +0000
Education red tape was Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-28 20:35 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-27 13:34 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Barry Gray <barrygray@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-12-27 17:28 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Brian <bbailey@argonet.co.uk> - 2015-12-27 18:14 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2015-12-27 20:01 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC M Harding <riscos@mdharding.org.uk> - 2015-12-27 19:57 +0000
Re: Virtual Acorn and UAC Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2015-12-21 13:52 +0000
csiph-web