Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #42746

Re: In defence of 80-char lines

Date 2013-04-04 06:09 -0500
From Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
Subject Re: In defence of 80-char lines
References <515cd919$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <c338b844-e9ce-46a7-9daf-20374372390e@googlegroups.com> <kjj7bk$22k$1@ger.gmane.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.94.1365073655.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2013-04-04 08:43, Peter Otten wrote:
> llanitedave wrote:
>> self.mainLabel.SetFont(wx.Font(12, wx.DEFAULT, wx.NORMAL, wx.BOLD, faceName = "FreeSans"))
> 
> I think I would prefer
> 
> labelfont = wx.Font(
>     pointSize=12,
>     style=wx.DEFAULT,
>     family=wx.NORMAL,
>     weight=wx.BOLD,
>     faceName="FreeSans")
> self.mainLabel.SetFont(labelfont)

+1
The only change I'd make to this suggestion would be to add a
semi-superfluous comma+newline after the last keyword argument too:

 labelfont = wx.Font(
     pointSize=12,
     style=wx.DEFAULT,
     family=wx.NORMAL,
     weight=wx.BOLD,
     faceName="FreeSans",
     )

which makes diffs cleaner when you need to insert something after
faceName:

--- peter1.txt  2013-04-04 06:03:01.420762566 -0500
+++ peter2.txt  2013-04-04 06:03:34.736762582 -0500
@@ -3,4 +3,5 @@
     style=wx.DEFAULT,
     family=wx.NORMAL,
     weight=wx.BOLD,
-    faceName="FreeSans")
+    faceName="FreeSans",
+    otherValue=42)

vs.

--- tkc1.txt    2013-04-04 06:02:52.436762562 -0500
+++ tkc2.txt    2013-04-04 06:03:51.392762588 -0500
@@ -4,4 +4,5 @@
     family=wx.NORMAL,
     weight=wx.BOLD,
     faceName="FreeSans",
+    otherValue=42,
     )

Additionally, if there are lots of keyword parameters like this, I'd
be tempted to keep them in sorted order for ease of tracking them
down (though CSS has long-standing arguments on how properties should
be ordered, so to each their own on this).

-tkc

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

In defence of 80-char lines Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-04 01:36 +0000
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 20:59 -0500
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> - 2013-04-03 22:40 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-04-03 21:32 -0700
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-04 06:33 +0000
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines gregor <gregor@ediwo.com> - 2013-04-04 08:40 +0200
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-04 08:43 +0200
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-04 06:09 -0500
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-04 07:52 -0400
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-04-04 08:28 -0700
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 08:18 -0400
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 18:18 +0100
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-04-04 18:22 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 21:56 -0700
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 08:15 +0100
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 08:13 -0400
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-04 08:39 -0400
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 09:23 -0400
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-04 15:56 +0000
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 23:04 +0530
        Re: In defence of 80-char lines Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-04 19:55 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> - 2013-04-04 12:12 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines jmfauth <wxjmfauth@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 13:28 -0700
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 17:00 -0400
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-05 00:14 +0000

csiph-web