Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #42746

Re: In defence of 80-char lines

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '+++': 0.03; 'parameters': 0.04; 'argument': 0.05; 'insert': 0.05; '-0500': 0.09; 'arguments': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; '-tkc': 0.16; 'cleaner': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'tempted': 0.16; 'to:addr:web.de': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; '---': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'properties': 0.29; 'css': 0.30; 'ease': 0.30; "i'd": 0.34; 'skip:s 30': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'keyword': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'how': 0.40; 'tracking': 0.61; 'otten': 0.84; 'received:50.22': 0.84
Date Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:09:13 -0500
From Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
To Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject Re: In defence of 80-char lines
In-Reply-To <kjj7bk$22k$1@ger.gmane.org>
References <515cd919$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <c338b844-e9ce-46a7-9daf-20374372390e@googlegroups.com> <kjj7bk$22k$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailer Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - boston.accountservergroup.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - tim.thechases.com
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.94.1365073655.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 58
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1365073656 news.xs4all.nl 6865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35131
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:42746

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2013-04-04 08:43, Peter Otten wrote:
> llanitedave wrote:
>> self.mainLabel.SetFont(wx.Font(12, wx.DEFAULT, wx.NORMAL, wx.BOLD, faceName = "FreeSans"))
> 
> I think I would prefer
> 
> labelfont = wx.Font(
>     pointSize=12,
>     style=wx.DEFAULT,
>     family=wx.NORMAL,
>     weight=wx.BOLD,
>     faceName="FreeSans")
> self.mainLabel.SetFont(labelfont)

+1
The only change I'd make to this suggestion would be to add a
semi-superfluous comma+newline after the last keyword argument too:

 labelfont = wx.Font(
     pointSize=12,
     style=wx.DEFAULT,
     family=wx.NORMAL,
     weight=wx.BOLD,
     faceName="FreeSans",
     )

which makes diffs cleaner when you need to insert something after
faceName:

--- peter1.txt  2013-04-04 06:03:01.420762566 -0500
+++ peter2.txt  2013-04-04 06:03:34.736762582 -0500
@@ -3,4 +3,5 @@
     style=wx.DEFAULT,
     family=wx.NORMAL,
     weight=wx.BOLD,
-    faceName="FreeSans")
+    faceName="FreeSans",
+    otherValue=42)

vs.

--- tkc1.txt    2013-04-04 06:02:52.436762562 -0500
+++ tkc2.txt    2013-04-04 06:03:51.392762588 -0500
@@ -4,4 +4,5 @@
     family=wx.NORMAL,
     weight=wx.BOLD,
     faceName="FreeSans",
+    otherValue=42,
     )

Additionally, if there are lots of keyword parameters like this, I'd
be tempted to keep them in sorted order for ease of tracking them
down (though CSS has long-standing arguments on how properties should
be ordered, so to each their own on this).

-tkc

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

In defence of 80-char lines Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-04 01:36 +0000
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 20:59 -0500
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> - 2013-04-03 22:40 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-04-03 21:32 -0700
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-04 06:33 +0000
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines gregor <gregor@ediwo.com> - 2013-04-04 08:40 +0200
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-04-04 08:43 +0200
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-04-04 06:09 -0500
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-04 07:52 -0400
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-04-04 08:28 -0700
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 08:18 -0400
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 18:18 +0100
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-04-04 18:22 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 21:56 -0700
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 08:15 +0100
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 08:13 -0400
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-04 08:39 -0400
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 09:23 -0400
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-04 15:56 +0000
      Re: In defence of 80-char lines Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 23:04 +0530
        Re: In defence of 80-char lines Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-04 19:55 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> - 2013-04-04 12:12 -0400
  Re: In defence of 80-char lines jmfauth <wxjmfauth@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 13:28 -0700
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 17:00 -0400
    Re: In defence of 80-char lines Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-05 00:14 +0000

csiph-web