Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106251
| From | Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Strange range |
| Date | 2016-04-01 20:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.327.1459540903.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87y48xjwqq.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <56fe76f2$0$22141$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ndlvrt$1hlp$1@gioia.aioe.org> <mailman.311.1459521083.28225.python-list@python.org> <87lh4xjt37.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
On 01/04/16 15:34, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>: > >> *A range object is not an iterator.* > > We now have learned as much. > > However, doesn't that extra level of indirection seem like an odd > choice? If you write your own class which has an __iter__ method, would you expect: >>> o = MyClass() >>> i1 = iter(o) >>> i2 = iter(o) >>> list(i1) ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] >>> list(i2) [] ? Or, would you expect both iterators to be independent and both return the 'foo', 'bar', 'baz' sequence (where that is the hypothetical result of iterating over your object)? If you now replace MyClass() with range(10), why would you expect the two iterators to be related? E.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 16:15 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 00:24 +1100
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-02 00:26 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 17:12 +0300
Re: Strange range Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:39 -0400
Re: Strange range Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:16 +0200
Re: Strange range Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-04-01 17:28 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:31 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 17:34 +0300
Re: Strange range Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-04-01 17:44 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:45 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 18:43 +0300
Re: Strange range Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-04-01 20:58 +0100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 23:14 +0300
Re: Strange range Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-04-01 20:21 +0000
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 23:44 +0300
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-02 21:09 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-02 13:48 +0300
Re: Strange range Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-02 12:47 -0700
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-02 23:44 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 07:05 +1000
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-03 00:40 +0300
Re: Strange range Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-02 14:50 -0700
Re: Strange range Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-04-02 23:43 -0700
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-03 09:58 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +1000
Re: Strange range Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-04-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Strange range Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-04 13:21 +0100
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 17:08 +1000
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-03 14:43 +1000
Re: Strange range Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-03 01:20 -0400
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-03 15:28 +1000
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 17:32 +0300
Re: Strange range Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:42 -0400
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:50 +1100
Re: Strange range Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:52 -0600
csiph-web