Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106284
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Strange range |
| Date | 2016-04-02 13:48 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87oa9sqoaz.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <mailman.311.1459521083.28225.python-list@python.org> <87lh4xjt37.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.327.1459540903.28225.python-list@python.org> <874mblrsr1.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <56ff9a73$0$1599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info>:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:14 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> (Somehow, the difference between iterables and iterators is analogous
>> with the difference between C's arrays and pointers.)
>
> I don't understand this analogy. Can you explain please?
In numerous contexts,
T a[N]
and
T *a
are interchangeable. In fact, C has no rvalue notation for an array. For
any other type, this works:
T a, b;
a = b;
However, if T is an array type, the compiler complains:
error: assignment to expression with array type
This C innovation of blurring the lines between arrays and pointers is
very different of the type system of Pascal, whose arrays behave like
any other type.
C could have treated arrays like other types without any loss of
generality. Then you'd have to write:
T a[N], *b;
b = &a[0];
for:
T a[N], *b;
b = a;
Semantically, as well, C arrays are iterables, and pointers are used to
iterate over the elements of an array.
Similarly, Python could have kept iterables and iterators in their
separate corners by specifying:
* iter(iterable) returns an iterator
* iter(iterator) typically raises an Exception
* the for statement requires an iterator
Then, you'd have to write:
for i in iter([1, 2, 3]):
...
Not recommending anything one way or another.
Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 16:15 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 00:24 +1100
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-02 00:26 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 17:12 +0300
Re: Strange range Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:39 -0400
Re: Strange range Fabien <fabien.maussion@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:16 +0200
Re: Strange range Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-04-01 17:28 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:31 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 17:34 +0300
Re: Strange range Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-04-01 17:44 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:45 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 18:43 +0300
Re: Strange range Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-04-01 20:58 +0100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 23:14 +0300
Re: Strange range Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-04-01 20:21 +0000
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 23:44 +0300
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-02 21:09 +1100
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-02 13:48 +0300
Re: Strange range Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-02 12:47 -0700
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-02 23:44 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 07:05 +1000
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-03 00:40 +0300
Re: Strange range Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-02 14:50 -0700
Re: Strange range Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io> - 2016-04-02 23:43 -0700
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-03 09:58 +0300
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +1000
Re: Strange range Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-04-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Strange range Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-04 13:21 +0100
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 17:08 +1000
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-03 14:43 +1000
Re: Strange range Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-03 01:20 -0400
Re: Strange range Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-03 15:28 +1000
Re: Strange range Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-01 17:32 +0300
Re: Strange range Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:42 -0400
Re: Strange range Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:50 +1100
Re: Strange range Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 08:52 -0600
csiph-web